Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The danger of technology discrimination

technology discrimination
Two technology balancing acts
d3sign/Getty Images

Stefflbauer is a Middle East expert and the founder and CEO of FrauenLoop, a computer programming school for resident, immigrant and refugee women in Germany. She is a Public Voices Fellow with The OpEd Project.

If you’re tired of hearing individuals weakly apologize for racism, then you’re probably exasperated by technology companies that do the same thing. The latest technology bias story has Instagram apologizing for adding “terrorist” to some Palestinian user profiles. That news provides another example of how tech companies regularly amplify social discrimination. Rather than being an alleviator of racial bias and a tool of racial justice, online technologies have the power to super-charge the dissemination of dehumanizing stereotypes and racist, sexist labels. Whereas, previously, you might have risked facing one person’s biased opinions off-line, online technologies can now reduce millions of people to stereotypes and caricatures that its victims are powerless to fight.

Black people already know that technology can be discriminatory, whether it identifies a person as an ape or fails to work altogether when dark-skinned people use it. Women have been raising alarms about bias in tech for years, as was the case when a secret Amazon hiring algorithm was found to discriminate against women. Or when Apple Pay’s credit algorithm awarded women lower credit scores than men. But women and Black people aren’t alone: In 2017, Chinese customers received refunds from Apple after claiming that the iPhone X face recognition couldn’t tell them apart. These examples show that technology is able to replicate human biases, in part, because discrimination by humans is restricted by law, while discrimination via computerized technologies oftentimes is not.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter


The public is quick to assign blame when it comes to people who are found to behave in a discriminatory manner. However, when technology products encourage discrimination, the public response may be too little, or come too late. For Rohingya, Turkish, Uighur and now Palestinian Muslims, a legal settlement after the fact may not be as effective as proactive regulations that prevent discrimination in the first place.

As a Black American, I am witness to repeated discrimination in our country by police and educational figures who choose to treat people differently based solely on their race. As a scholar of Middle East history who spent years studying in North Africa and the Arab Levant, I see the same type of bigotry encoded into popular technologies. To be sure, you don’t need to personally suffer discrimination in order to recognize that it’s wrong. Many American Jews, for example, protested against the discriminatory treatment of Black Americans during the U.S. civil rights era. Today, Jewish Voice for Peace is publicly taking a stand against bigotry towards other groups. You don’t need to be Arab or a Muslim to recognize that tech companies discriminating against those groups leads us to becoming a two-class society — something this country has seen before.

It’s time for unequal treatment of consumers by the largest tech companies on earth to end. Remember the fictional country Wakanda depicted in the movie “Black Panther”? That film drew millions of viewers worldwide in 2018, partly because audiences of color knew that they would visit a place where racial stereotypes would not appear. Tech companies have been promising people of color an online Wakanda for years, but none of them — not even Mark Zuckerberg’s immersive Metaverse — have delivered. We never know when harmful social or cultural biases will show up, but whether it is chatbots, algorithmic photo filters or predictive algorithms, examples of tech-enabled discrimination still abound.

When we have leaders in Congress who either don’t understand tech or don’t care, and a tech industry that seemingly is more concerned with profits than justice, it is up to citizens to make a difference. We can speak up in protest, the way that people all over the world are protesting against the spread of offline ethnic and racial discrimination and violence. We can also write to elected representatives to demand appropriate regulation, audits and heavy fines for companies whose technology biases harm us all by stereotyping us or by arbitrarily labeling us as “undesirables.”

With the integration of artificial intelligence into our lives at an ever increasing rate, now is the time to take action to prevent human biases getting regurgitated by technology. As the latest Instagram example proves, that future may already be here.

Read More

Trump’s Tariffs: a burden on workers, a boon for the wealthy

An illustration of a deconstructed dollar bill.

Getty Images, rob dobi

Trump’s Tariffs: a burden on workers, a boon for the wealthy

Earlier this year, President Trump imposed tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China, claiming they would fix trade imbalances and protect jobs. However, instead of helping American workers, these tariffs act as hidden taxes; they drive up costs and feed inflation. While average Americans bear the brunt of higher prices and lost jobs, the wealthy are insulated from the worst effects.

Many economists assert that tariffs are stealth taxes, that is, the burden is not distributed equally—while corporations may adjust by diversifying suppliers or passing costs along, working households cannot escape higher prices on essential goods like groceries and electronics. Analysts estimate these tariffs could add $1,250 to the annual cost of living for the average American household—a substantial burden for families already struggling with inflation. Additionally, according to the well-regarded Tax Foundation, the tariffs are projected to reduce GDP by 0.5% and result in the loss of approximately 292,000 jobs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Figurines of manual workers with stacks of coins

Getty Images/Glow Images

Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Among the international trade issues making headlines is President Trump’s recent announcement to abandon current U.S. law regarding small, low-value packages containing products purchased by Americans from overseas. The initial Executive Order was paused just days later. But the threat remains, making damaging economic repercussions imminent.

The process for such small-dollar shipments is de minimis entry. The term means “pertaining to tiny or trivial things,” emphasizing why its usage only applies to goods under a lower-priced threshold.

Keep ReadingShow less
Dictionary definition of tariff
Would replacing the income tax with higher tariffs help ‘struggling Americans’?
Devonyu/Getty Images

Could Trump’s tariffs have unintended consequences that hurt America?

The first few weeks of the Trump administration have been head-spinning. President Trump and his team were well-prepared to launch their policy agenda, signing over 50 executive orders, the most in a president's first month in more than 40 years. A major focus has been economic policy, first with immigration raids, which were quickly followed by announcements of tariffs on imports from America’s biggest trade partners.

The tariff announcements have followed a meandering and confusing course. President Trump announced the first tariffs on February 1, but within 24 hours, he suspended the tariffs on Mexico and Canada in favor of “negotiations.” Mexico and Canada agreed to enforce their borders better to stop migrants and fentanyl imports, which the Trump administration called a victory. Despite the triumphalist rhetoric, the enforcement measures were substantially the same as what both countries were already planning to do.

Keep ReadingShow less
Elon Musk's X Factor Won’t Fix Big Government

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk speaks with former president Donald Trump during a campaign event at the Butler Farm Show, Saturday, Oct. 5, 2024, in Butler, Pa.

Getty Images, The Washington Post

Elon Musk's X Factor Won’t Fix Big Government

Elon Musk’s reputation as a disruptor, transforming industries like automobiles and space travel with Tesla and SpaceX, will be severely tested as he turns his attention to government reform through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). DOGE lacks official agency status and depends on volunteers, raising concerns about its credibility. Musk claims his team of young techies can slash federal spending by $2 trillion, but history casts serious doubt on private-sector fixes for big government. So far, he has largely avoided legal scrutiny with the GOP-led Congress’ help, while handing sensitive operations to his team of “experts.” What could possibly go wrong?

Musk’s plan involves embedding these techies in federal agencies to find inefficiencies. His confidence comes from past successes, such as cost-cutting at X (formerly Twitter) through drastic measures like layoffs. There’s no denying that private-sector innovation has improved government services before—cloud computing, AI-driven fraud detection, and streamlined procurement have saved billions. But running a government isn’t like running a business. It’s not just about efficiency or profit—it’s about providing essential services, enforcing laws, and balancing competing interests to ensure a measure of fairness.

Keep ReadingShow less