Census bureau sued to stop gathering of citizen population data
A federal lawsuit brought last week by Latino and immigrants' rights groups is seeking to stop the Trump administration from publicizing estimates of the citizen population along with the 2020 census results.
Effectively blocked by the Supreme Court from putting a citizenship question on the census, President Trump has ordered the Commerce Department to come up with numbers using existing government records – in time for delivery to the states along with the detailed population figures.
While congressional districts have to be drawn based on total population, according to a plain-text reading of the Constitution, there's some legal opening for states to draw their own legislative boundaries based on citizenship. That would shrink power in immigrant communities and cities to the benefit of whiter and more rural areas – another route to the sort of partisan gerrymandering that democracy reformers decry.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Maryland, says the collection of citizenship data for this purpose violates the Constitution's Equal Protection clause and federal administrative law. "Defendants' actions should also be enjoined because they are motivated by racial animus, are discriminatory toward Latinos and non-citizens, and are the result of a partisan conspiracy intended to dilute the representation of non-citizens and Latinos," the lawsuit says.
The suit was first reported in Talking Points Memo. The government had not responded as of Monday afternoon.
- Trump's fight to count citizens and non-citizens: 5 questions answered ›
- Even without a citizenship question, fear complicates 2020 census ... ›
- For Latino officials, census concerns go beyond citizenship question ... ›
Marginal improvements have been made to help voters understand the questions posed to them on the ballot this November, a new study concludes, but such ballot measures still favor the college-educated — who represent a minority of the U.S. population.
This year voters in eight states will decide the fate of a collective 36 such propositions. In a study released Thursday, Ballotpedia assessed how easy it is to comprehend what each proposal would accomplish, concluding that the difficulty level had decreased compared with the referendums decided in the last off-year election of 2017 — but not by much.
In fact, according to a pair of well-established tests, 21 of the 36 ballot measures cannot be understood by the 40 percent of the voting-age population who never attended college.
Colorado has become the second state to ask the Supreme Court to decide if states may legally bind their presidential electors to vote for the candidate who carried their state.
The issue of so-called faithless electors is the latest aspect of an increasingly heated debate about the virtues and flaws of the Electoral College that has blossomed, especially among progressive democracy reform advocates, now that two of the past five presidential winners (Donald Trump in 2016 and George W. Bush in 2000) got to the Oval Office despite losing the national popular vote.