Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The Violence We Refuse to See

America’s paralysis in the face of recurring shootings reveals a deeper fracture in our civic life: a willingness to normalize the unthinkable and sanctify the status quo.

Opinion

The Violence We Refuse to See

Students demonstrate for stricter gun control legislation as part of a March for Our Lives rally at the Iowa state capitol building on January 08, 2024 in Des Moines, Iowa.

Getty Images, Scott Olson

The news ticker denotes yet another shooting and fire, this time at a Latter-day Saint church in Michigan. This tragic incident occurred only weeks after the massacre at Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis, a tragedy whose shock had barely begun to fade from public memory. Each headline was a fresh rupture in our collective psyche, each one a new entry in the ever-lengthening register of loss. I felt the same fatigue—the hollow, tightening ache of resignation. How many times can we say “not again” before the words' meaning dissipates?

America has a peculiar way of justifying sin and bearing her scars. Our country’s response to violence is not just inadequate; it is complicit. We have constructed a body politic that tolerates, even sanctifies, these acts through legislative inertia and a distorted interpretation of constitutional rights. The sacred text of our republic has become a shield for the status quo, with lawmakers and justices hiding behind its language to justify inaction. Leaders at every level offer only platitudes, as if thoughts and prayers could bind wounds that legislation refuses to heal.


Our nation’s dysfunction runs deeper than any one event or single perpetrator. Behind the headlines are the haunted: families who will never again feel whole, first responders who carry silent burdens, and clergy who must find words when language feels useless. And behind them, a vast community of the traumatized—students, parents, teachers, neighbors—bound together not by choice but by the grim lottery of proximity. This is not the mark of a healthy society. It is the sign of a nation adrift, its soul eroded by violence and its conscience dulled by repetition.

For too long, we have allowed the Second Amendment to become a fetish, a hollow idol masquerading as the protector of liberty while it presides over carnage. The right to bear arms, as presently interpreted, has eclipsed the right to life, to safety, to peace in one’s own community. Courts and legislators, paralyzed by special interests and political cowardice, mistake stubbornness for principle. In their hands, the Constitution is not a living covenant but a brittle relic, wielded to silence dissent, excuse inaction, and preserve power. This is not the vision of the founders. And it is certainly not the vision of any faith tradition worth its salt.

Our willful misreading of scripture and statute alike has become a kind of civic blasphemy, a refusal to see the image of God in the faces of the fallen. For countless numbers of us who lead faith communities, there is no luxury of resignation. It is a work not only to comfort the afflicted but also to rouse the indifferent. We must resist the temptation to grow numb, to treat violence as inevitable. We must insist that this is not normal.

Clerics' role is twofold: to witness and to act. We must name the pain honestly, without flinching from its agony or complexity. We must lament, yes, but lament is not the end. It is the beginning. Continue in questioning: What can we do when the world seems unmoved by our grief? How do we live faithfully in a nation addicted to violence? The following strategies are not panaceas, but they are starting points for those unwilling to accept mass death as the price of citizenship:

  • Create spaces for lament and truth-telling.
    Refuse the temptation to “move on.” Convene vigils, listening circles, and public rituals of mourning. Let grief and anger be spoken aloud. Name the pain without softening its edges. Invite survivors, first responders, and neighbors to bear witness and honor their vulnerability.
  • Build local coalitions for prevention and care.
    Partner with schools, mental health providers, advocacy groups, and civic leaders to develop trauma-informed responses and preventive strategies. Equip clergy, educators, and volunteers with training in crisis intervention and advocacy. Do not assume expertise—seek it, share it, sustain it.
  • Challenge perverse constitutional mythologies.
    Speak plainly about the ways our legal and political systems have been warped to excuse violence. Teach about the true meaning of justice, the limits of individual rights, and the demands of the common good. Call out lawmakers and judges who hide behind doctrine to avoid responsibility.
  • Model civic courage and public accountability.
    Refuse to accept moral evasion from elected officials. Demand policy change: sensible gun laws, increased funding for mental health, and investments in community safety. Organize letter-writing campaigns, town halls, and peaceful protests. Make it impossible for leaders to ignore your community’s voice.
  • Foster cross-community solidarity.
    Recognize that violence does not respect boundaries of race, religion, or geography. Build relationships across faiths, neighborhoods, and political lines. Share resources and strategies. Learn from global movements and adapt their wisdom to your context.
  • Cultivate spiritual resilience.
    Encourage practices of prayer, meditation, and mutual support that sustain hope in the long haul. Remind one another that despair is not inevitable, and that faith is not passive. Faith acts, even when the odds seem insurmountable.

Simply put, we cannot legislate love, but we can legislate safety. We cannot end evil, but we can refuse to enable it. We cannot restore every broken heart, but we can refuse to surrender our outrage, our empathy, our hope. May we refuse to settle for a politics of impotence and a faith of resignation. My hope is that we become the kind of citizens whose resolve is as fierce as our grief, and whose hope is as stubborn as our pain. Most importantly, let us mourn with Michigan, but let us not stop there.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, and scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

People having Thanksgiving dinner
How to get along at Thanksgiving
VioletaStoimenova/Getty Images

Forget the survival guides: Politics is rarely an issue at Thanksgiving

Thanksgiving is often portrayed as a minefield of political debates, with an annual surge of guides offering tips to "survive" political conversations at the dinner table. But this raises a question: How helpful are these guides?

Research actually shows that most Americans neither want nor need the abundance of advice. A study conducted just before Thanksgiving 2024 found that while >90% of Americans celebrate Thanksgiving, less than a third planned to discuss the presidential election held earlier that month. Considering Gallup’s finding that “Americans’ attention to national political news is cyclical, usually spiking in presidential election years,” interest in talking about politics may even be lower this year, despite all the political news.

Other previous studies also show that relatively few want to talk about politics over the holiday. A 2022 Axios/Ipsos poll found that 77% of Americans believe Thanksgiving is not the right time for political discussions. Somewhat similarly, a 2023 Quinnipiac poll found that only 29% of Americans say they are looking forward to discussing politics at Thanksgiving, compared with less than half who say they hope to avoid it.

Keep ReadingShow less
People having Thanksgiving dinner
How to get along at Thanksgiving
VioletaStoimenova/Getty Images

Forget the survival guides: Politics is rarely an issue at Thanksgiving

Thanksgiving is often portrayed as a minefield of political debates, with an annual surge of guides offering tips to "survive" political conversations at the dinner table. But this raises a question: How helpful are these guides?

Research actually shows that most Americans neither want nor need the abundance of advice. A study conducted just before Thanksgiving 2024 found that while >90% of Americans celebrate Thanksgiving, less than a third planned to discuss the presidential election held earlier that month. Considering Gallup’s finding that “Americans’ attention to national political news is cyclical, usually spiking in presidential election years,” interest in talking about politics may even be lower this year, despite all the political news.

Other previous studies also show that relatively few want to talk about politics over the holiday. A 2022 Axios/Ipsos poll found that 77% of Americans believe Thanksgiving is not the right time for political discussions. Somewhat similarly, a 2023 Quinnipiac poll found that only 29% of Americans say they are looking forward to discussing politics at Thanksgiving, compared with less than half who say they hope to avoid it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Rethinking the Church’s Calling in a Time of Crisis
person's hand
Photo by Billy Pasco on Unsplash

Rethinking the Church’s Calling in a Time of Crisis

There is a significant distinction between charity and justice. Charity responds to visible wounds in the community and rushes to bandage them as necessary. Justice, rooted in biblical conviction and prophetic courage, goes further. It questions the sources of suffering: Why are people bleeding in the first place? This tension between crisis response and deeper transformation is at the core of a courageous step recently taken by Atlanta's New Birth Missionary Baptist Church.

As the nation grapples with democratic strain and institutional fatigue, New Birth's decision to suspend the collection of tithes and offerings during a government shutdown and amid the threatened rollback of social supports is a daring example of moral clarity. It is more than an act of relief; it is a refusal to proceed with business as usual when the most economically vulnerable are again being asked to bear the highest costs. The pause is not merely financial; I believe it is prophetic. An assertion that the church's highest duty is to its people, not its ledger.

Keep ReadingShow less
We Are Not Going Back to the Sidelines!

Participants of the seventh LGBTIQ+ Political Leaders Conference of the Americas and the Caribbean.

Photograph courtesy of Siara Horna. © liderazgoslgbt.com/Siara

We Are Not Going Back to the Sidelines!

"A Peruvian, a Spaniard, a Mexican, a Colombian, and a Brazilian meet in Lima." This is not a cliché nor the beginning of a joke, but rather the powerful image of four congresswomen and a councilwoman who openly, militantly, and courageously embrace their diversity. At the National Congress building in Peru, the officeholders mentioned above—Susel Paredes, Carla Antonelli, Celeste Ascencio, Carolina Giraldo, and Juhlia Santos—presided over the closing session of the seventh LGBTIQ+ Political Leaders Conference of the Americas and the Caribbean.

The September 2025 event was convened by a coalition of six organizations defending the rights of LGBTQ+ people in the region and brought together almost 200 delegates from 18 countries—mostly political party leaders, as well as NGO and elected officials. Ten years after its first gathering, the conference returned to the Peruvian capital to produce the "Lima Agenda," a 10-year roadmap with actions in six areas to advance toward full inclusion in political participation, guaranteeing the right of LGBTQ+ people to be candidates—elected, visible, and protected in the public sphere, with dignity and without discrimination. The agenda's focus areas include: constitutional protections, full and diverse citizenship, egalitarian democracy, politics without hate, education and collective memory, and comprehensive justice and reparation.

Keep ReadingShow less