Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Violence We Refuse to See

America’s paralysis in the face of recurring shootings reveals a deeper fracture in our civic life: a willingness to normalize the unthinkable and sanctify the status quo.

Opinion

The Violence We Refuse to See

Students demonstrate for stricter gun control legislation as part of a March for Our Lives rally at the Iowa state capitol building on January 08, 2024 in Des Moines, Iowa.

Getty Images, Scott Olson

The news ticker denotes yet another shooting and fire, this time at a Latter-day Saint church in Michigan. This tragic incident occurred only weeks after the massacre at Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis, a tragedy whose shock had barely begun to fade from public memory. Each headline was a fresh rupture in our collective psyche, each one a new entry in the ever-lengthening register of loss. I felt the same fatigue—the hollow, tightening ache of resignation. How many times can we say “not again” before the words' meaning dissipates?

America has a peculiar way of justifying sin and bearing her scars. Our country’s response to violence is not just inadequate; it is complicit. We have constructed a body politic that tolerates, even sanctifies, these acts through legislative inertia and a distorted interpretation of constitutional rights. The sacred text of our republic has become a shield for the status quo, with lawmakers and justices hiding behind its language to justify inaction. Leaders at every level offer only platitudes, as if thoughts and prayers could bind wounds that legislation refuses to heal.


Our nation’s dysfunction runs deeper than any one event or single perpetrator. Behind the headlines are the haunted: families who will never again feel whole, first responders who carry silent burdens, and clergy who must find words when language feels useless. And behind them, a vast community of the traumatized—students, parents, teachers, neighbors—bound together not by choice but by the grim lottery of proximity. This is not the mark of a healthy society. It is the sign of a nation adrift, its soul eroded by violence and its conscience dulled by repetition.

For too long, we have allowed the Second Amendment to become a fetish, a hollow idol masquerading as the protector of liberty while it presides over carnage. The right to bear arms, as presently interpreted, has eclipsed the right to life, to safety, to peace in one’s own community. Courts and legislators, paralyzed by special interests and political cowardice, mistake stubbornness for principle. In their hands, the Constitution is not a living covenant but a brittle relic, wielded to silence dissent, excuse inaction, and preserve power. This is not the vision of the founders. And it is certainly not the vision of any faith tradition worth its salt.

Our willful misreading of scripture and statute alike has become a kind of civic blasphemy, a refusal to see the image of God in the faces of the fallen. For countless numbers of us who lead faith communities, there is no luxury of resignation. It is a work not only to comfort the afflicted but also to rouse the indifferent. We must resist the temptation to grow numb, to treat violence as inevitable. We must insist that this is not normal.

Clerics' role is twofold: to witness and to act. We must name the pain honestly, without flinching from its agony or complexity. We must lament, yes, but lament is not the end. It is the beginning. Continue in questioning: What can we do when the world seems unmoved by our grief? How do we live faithfully in a nation addicted to violence? The following strategies are not panaceas, but they are starting points for those unwilling to accept mass death as the price of citizenship:

  • Create spaces for lament and truth-telling.
    Refuse the temptation to “move on.” Convene vigils, listening circles, and public rituals of mourning. Let grief and anger be spoken aloud. Name the pain without softening its edges. Invite survivors, first responders, and neighbors to bear witness and honor their vulnerability.
  • Build local coalitions for prevention and care.
    Partner with schools, mental health providers, advocacy groups, and civic leaders to develop trauma-informed responses and preventive strategies. Equip clergy, educators, and volunteers with training in crisis intervention and advocacy. Do not assume expertise—seek it, share it, sustain it.
  • Challenge perverse constitutional mythologies.
    Speak plainly about the ways our legal and political systems have been warped to excuse violence. Teach about the true meaning of justice, the limits of individual rights, and the demands of the common good. Call out lawmakers and judges who hide behind doctrine to avoid responsibility.
  • Model civic courage and public accountability.
    Refuse to accept moral evasion from elected officials. Demand policy change: sensible gun laws, increased funding for mental health, and investments in community safety. Organize letter-writing campaigns, town halls, and peaceful protests. Make it impossible for leaders to ignore your community’s voice.
  • Foster cross-community solidarity.
    Recognize that violence does not respect boundaries of race, religion, or geography. Build relationships across faiths, neighborhoods, and political lines. Share resources and strategies. Learn from global movements and adapt their wisdom to your context.
  • Cultivate spiritual resilience.
    Encourage practices of prayer, meditation, and mutual support that sustain hope in the long haul. Remind one another that despair is not inevitable, and that faith is not passive. Faith acts, even when the odds seem insurmountable.

Simply put, we cannot legislate love, but we can legislate safety. We cannot end evil, but we can refuse to enable it. We cannot restore every broken heart, but we can refuse to surrender our outrage, our empathy, our hope. May we refuse to settle for a politics of impotence and a faith of resignation. My hope is that we become the kind of citizens whose resolve is as fierce as our grief, and whose hope is as stubborn as our pain. Most importantly, let us mourn with Michigan, but let us not stop there.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, and scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

Group of workers

Group of workers

Picture provided

Washington’s Domestic Workers Win Protections After Years of Organizing

Years of rallying on the steps of the Capitol building, marching through streets and testifying before legislators have paid off for Washington’s house cleaners, childcare providers, gardeners and their supporters.

On March 9, Gov. Bob Ferguson signed the Domestic Workers Bill of Rights into law, making Washington the 13th state to ensure basic labor protections for domestic workers, according to the domestic employers network Hand in Hand. These rights include fair pay, written contracts and protection from discrimination for workers doing domestic services in a private residence.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pro-immigrant protestor

Immigration Activists Protest Against ICE

Getty Images

Bipartisan Support for Legal Status and Immigration Reform

While immigration is a highly divisive issue in Washington, DC, new surveys in 11 competitive states and 28 congressional districts across the country reveal substantial bipartisan common ground among the public on proposals to address the millions of undocumented people living in the US.

These results come from surveys conducted by the Program for Public Consultation (PPC) to nearly 20,000 adults from May 27th to June 25th, as part of its Common Ground in the Battlegrounds? survey series being conducted in the run-up to the November election, as well as in a national survey conducted in February with over 2500 respondents.

Keep ReadingShow less
ladder inside head silhouette illustration
ladder inside head silhouette illustration

Father-Daughter Bonding: The Art of Disagreeing Well

From the moment my youngest daughter was born, she carved out her own space in my world. I remember the pediatrician remarking on her long eyelashes, my brief panic when she didn't cry right away, and then the overwhelming relief and joy of holding her as she looked up and seemed to smile.

Growing up in the United States, most children called their fathers “Dad.” She chose something different. She called me Nanna—the Telugu word for father. It was a small, sweet choice that signaled the unique intellectual and emotional bond we would share. I have three daughters, and while my relationships with her older sisters are deep and powerful in their own ways, this is the daughter who shares this particular story with me.

Keep ReadingShow less
ball under basketball ring
ball under basketball ring
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

Fairness and Inclusion in Women’s Sports

Two former NBA players have said they want to play in the Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA). Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White announced their intent to enter the WNBA draft, claiming—falsely—that they identify as women to force the WNBA to clarify its policy, which restricts participation to women without defining what it means to be a woman. The players’ announcement followed closely on the heels of WNBA player Sophie Cunningham’s public comments that it was “common sense” that only “biological women” be permitted to compete in the WNBA. Cunningham’s comments drew competing rallies to her games, either supporting or denouncing her stance. Her statement was preceded by the first Supreme Court ruling on eligibility for female sports competitions at the school and college level, a ruling that does not apply to professional sports. In West Virginia v. B. P. J., the Supreme Court affirmed that U.S. states may legally bar transgender girls and women from female school or collegiate sports teams, leaving states to decide.

Public discussion of this issue has been deeply polarized. Some on the political left have asserted that “trans women are women” and that anyone who opposes their participation in elite women’s sports is a bigot. Meanwhile, some on the political right have presented trans women athletes as male athletes stealing women’s trophies. This is a classic case of affective polarization—a phenomenon in which people feel their identities, values, or rights are at stake. They become less willing to consider alternative perspectives and demonize those with opposing views.

Keep ReadingShow less