Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Partisan tussle interrupts House probe of midterm voter suppression

The House Oversight Committee's majority Democrats have overstepped their bounds by asking officials in Georgia, Texas and Kansas for information about election procedures that prompted allegations of voter suppression last fall, Republicans say.

But the Democrats say they're not backing down on the signature effort by Congress to review abuse of voting rights and other political malfeasance in the 2018 midterm because the Constitution and the national political will are on their side.


"We have serious concerns that your letters appear to be an attempt to insert the committee into particular state election proceedings, for which we do not see a legitimate legislative purpose," the committee's ranking minority party member, Jim Jordan of Ohio, said in a letter signed by three other Republicans. "By seeking voluminous records relating to election administration of sovereign states, your investigation offends state-federal comity."

The Republicans also sent officials in the three states letters that, while not explicitly encouraging defiance, noted that the "partisan" inquiries raised "serious federalism concerns" and exceeded Congress' investigative authority.

Maryland's Jamie Raskin, the Democratic chairman of the civil rights and civil liberties subcommittee, wrote back to the House GOP overnight to say the committee "has the power and obligation to enforce the voting rights of the people" under five different parts of the Constitution.

Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings, also a Maryland Democrat, vowed to plow ahead, saying: "With a Democratic president, there was no allegation too small to investigate, but now that Donald Trump is in the White House, there is apparently no scandal too big to ignore."

Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton of Texas told the committee last week he was rebuffing the request for information about the state's aggressive but mistake-filled effort to purge suspected noncitizens from its voter rosters. But the committee says it is getting cooperation from the others. It is seeking explanations about election procedures across Georgia from GOP Gov. Brian Kemp and wants the county clerk of Ford County, Kansas, to explain why she moved the single polling location in Dodge City to a site far from public transit.


Read More

Members of a women's softball team cheerfully join hands during practice on a sunny day, showcasing team spirit, cooperation, and enthusiasm for the sport.

Do trans women have a strength advantage? A look at studies on hormone therapy, muscle mass, and why it should determine eligibility in women's sports.

luza studios/Getty Images

Trans Females Are Not Biological Males - Let Them Play on Female Teams

Most Americans, Democrats as well as Republicans—many following the lead of President Trump—feel that it is not right for trans females to participate in women's sports. But the trans community, supported by those on the left wing of the Democratic Party, insists that this is part of ensuring the rights of trans people. The issue has been divisive among Democrats.

This is a complex issue. On the one hand, boys are boys, and girls are girls. That's the basic fact behind male and female sports, other than some intramural school sports that have boys and girls on the same team. Because boys are biologically stronger and faster than girls, separate leagues have been developed for both. This has nothing to do with gender identity; it is just a reflection of biological fact.

Keep ReadingShow less
An aerial view of a Flock camera

An aerial view of a Flock camera in Burbank, California. U.S. President Donald Trump expressed support for Flock cameras, saying he likes the AI-powered surveillance technology because of its use by law enforcement, despite concerns that it infringes on privacy.

(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Flock Cameras Are Coming Down – but We Need More To Dismantle the Surveillance State

Chances are, you’ve seen one in your neighborhood. Flock cameras have become a major flashpoint for voters in the leadup to the midterms. The concept sounds straight out of 1984 — a network of government-owned cameras that track your movements — it’s no wonder that Americans across party lines are demanding their states and towns sever ties with the controversial company. Surveillance fears are only getting stronger as we enter the AI era.

But the problem isn’t just Flock. These cameras, Automated License Plate Readers or ALPRs to be exact, are a symptom of a larger “surveil first, ask questions later” attitude that has been adopted by local and federal government for decades. In recent years, the federal government has been dramatically expanding the nation’s surveillance infrastructure. This has taken many forms, from facial recognition technology at the airport, to law enforcement monitoring your mail, to the government watching what you’re posting on your personal social media pages. Since April, many Democrats and Republicans in Congress have united to stop what would effectively be a blank check for surveillance via FISA reauthorization, demanding surveillance reforms such as closing the “data broker loophole”, which allows the government to buy Americans’ personal data without a warrant.

Keep ReadingShow less