Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Don't judge a heart by its color

Don't judge a heart by its color

Candace Asher is a Nashville/New York critically acclaimed soulful pop-country artist who earned several top 5 hits in the early 2000’s

David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

The pop-culture section of The Fulcrum was created based on the belief that music, theater, film and the arts in general serve a valuable role in expressing the feelings and emotions around the news that we report on. The goal is to heighten our readers’ interest in becoming involved and working toward a stronger and more vibrant democracy.


Every so often, I come across an artist that reinforces my belief in this connection between democracy and the arts. As the great American singer, songwriter and civil rights activist Nina Simone said in 2013:

"An artist's duty, as far as I'm concerned, is to reflect the times. I think that is true of painters, sculptors, poets, musicians. As far as I'm concerned, it's their choice, but I CHOOSE to reflect the times and situations in which I find myself. That, to me, is my duty. And at this crucial time in our lives, when everything is so desperate, when everyday is a matter of survival, I don't think you can help but be involved. Young people, black and white, know this. That's why they're so involved in politics. We will shape and mold this country or it will not be molded and shaped at all anymore. So I don't think you have a choice. How can you be an artist and NOT reflect the times? That to me is the definition of an artist."

Last week, I had the great fortune of meeting Candace Asher, a songwriter and performer, who told me of an experience of how a moment in history impacted her artistic journey. As we talked, I learned that there has always been a social-change-maker part of her that is a deep part of her soul. Her music crafts strong lyric messages that she hopes, “will inspire people, especially youth, to cope with difficulties, conflicts and pain.”

Prior to our meeting I came across a song by Candace and Jeff Bernstein entitled, “Don't Judge A Heart By Its Color,'' and I asked her what inspired her to write the song along with Jeff.

Candace told me that like so many Americans, she was deeply impacted by the George Floyd killing in May of 2020 and had an urgency as an artist to address the racial divide in America but she wasn’t quite sure how.

I also learned that Candace is a survivor of rape at knifepoint. Her attacker was a race different from her own. The impact on her was unimaginable and the writing of the song also served to help her rise above the attack she had endured.

As a singer-songwriter interested in the use of music to promote healing and change, Candace eventually penned “Don't Judge A Heart By Its Color'' with Jeff Bernstein to help her rise above the attack she'd endured and to inspire others to manage difficult emotions and scars with insight and forgiveness in their life's healing journey.

As so often happens in life, seemingly unrelated situations arise that are useful in allowing us to think about a life situation in a different way. Some of these occurrences are sources of encouragement, some motivating and some help us process the pain before we can move on.

One such occurrence for Candace was coming across a quote by the deceased Supreme Court Justice Ruth Gader Ginsburg:

“I try to teach through my opinions, through my speeches, how wrong it is to judge people on the basis of what they look like, the color of their skin, whether they're men or women.”

Reading that quote was an affirmation for Candace that her song had a message for all and she should sing it for others so they could heal themselves and by doing so heal help heal the racial divide in America. If we do not do so as individuals, the world will never heal.

We present to you “Don't Judge A Heart By Its Color.”

Read More

​DCF Commissioner Jodi Hill-Lilly.

DCF Commissioner Jodi Hill-Lilly speaks to the gathering at an adoption ceremony in Torrington.

Laura Tillman / CT Mirror

What’s Behind the Smiles on National Adoption Day

In the past 21 years, I’ve fostered and adopted children with complex medical and developmental needs. Last year, after a grueling 2,205 days navigating the DCF system, we adopted our 7yo daughter. This year, we were the last family on the docket for National Adoption Day after 589 days of suspense. While my 2 yo daughter’s adoption was a moment of triumph, the cold, empty courtroom symbolized the system’s detachment from the lived experiences of marginalized families.

National Adoption Day often serves as a time to highlight stories of joy and family unification. Yet, behind the scenes, the obstacles faced by children in foster care and the families that support them tell a more complex story—one that demands attention and action. For those of us who have navigated the foster care system as caregivers, the systemic indifference and disparities experienced by marginalized children and families, particularly within BIPOC and disability communities, remain glaringly unresolved.

Keep ReadingShow less
Framing "Freedom"

hands holding a sign that reads "FREEDOM"

Photo Credit: gpointstudio

Framing "Freedom"

The idea of “freedom” is important to Americans. It’s a value that resonates with a lot of people, and consistently ranks among the most important. It’s a uniquely powerful motivator, with broad appeal across the political spectrum. No wonder, then, that we as communicators often appeal to the value of freedom when making a case for change.

But too often, I see people understand values as magic words that can be dropped into our communications and work exactly the way we want them to. Don’t get me wrong: “freedom” is a powerful word. But simply mentioning freedom doesn’t automatically lead everyone to support the policies we want or behave the way we’d like.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hands resting on another.

Amid headlines about Epstein, survivors’ voices remain overlooked. This piece explores how restorative justice offers CSA survivors healing and choice.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

What Do Epstein’s Victims Need?

Jeffrey Epstein is all over the news, along with anyone who may have known about, enabled, or participated in his systematic child sexual abuse. Yet there is significantly less information and coverage on the perspectives, stories and named needs of these survivors themselves. This is almost always the case for any type of coverage on incidences of sexual violence – we first ask “how should we punish the offender?”, before ever asking “what does the survivor want?” For way too long, survivors of sexual violence, particularly of childhood sexual abuse (CSA), have been cast to the wayside, treated like witnesses to crimes committed against the state, rather than the victims of individuals that have caused them enormous harm. This de-emphasis on direct survivors of CSA is often presented as a form of “protection” or “respect for their privacy” and while keeping survivors safe is of the utmost importance, so is the centering and meeting of their needs, even when doing so means going against the grain of what the general public or criminal legal system think are conventional or acceptable responses to violence. Restorative justice (RJ) is one of those “unconventional” responses to CSA and yet there is a growing number of survivors who are naming it as a form of meeting their needs for justice and accountability. But what is restorative justice and why would a CSA survivor ever want it?

“You’re the most powerful person I’ve ever known and you did not deserve what I did to you.” These words were spoken toward the end of a “victim offender dialogue”, a restorative justice process in which an adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse had elected to meet face-to-face for a facilitated conversation with the person that had harmed her. This phrase was said by the man who had violently sexually abused her in her youth, as he sat directly across from her, now an adult woman. As these two people looked at each other at that moment, the shift in power became tangible, as did a dissolvement of shame in both parties. Despite having gone through a formal court process, this survivor needed more…more space to ask questions, to name the impacts this violence had and continues to have in her life, to speak her truth directly to the person that had harmed her more than anyone else, and to reclaim her power. We often talk about the effects of restorative justice in the abstract, generally ineffable and far too personal to be classifiable; but in that instant, it was a felt sense, it was a moment of undeniable healing for all those involved and a form of justice and accountability that this survivor had sought for a long time, yet had not received until that instance.

Keep ReadingShow less