Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

In swing states, R's and D's oppose criminalizing abortion before fetal viability

Abortion rights protestors

Arizona residents rally for abortion rights in April, on the heels of the state Supreme Court decision enacting an 1864 law banning abortion.

Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

While policymakers argue over whether abortion should be a right or a crime, the public has a clear policy stance on the matter. A new survey in the six swing states finds that majorities of Republicans and Democrats oppose criminalizing abortion before fetal viability.

Furthermore, bipartisan majorities favor reducing unintended pregnancies and abortions through policies ensuring access to birth control.


This survey by the University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation is the fifth in the Swing Six Issue Surveys series, being conducted in the run-up to the November election in six swing states, and nationally, on major policies. Unlike traditional polls, respondents in a public consultation survey go through an online “policymaking simulation” in which they are provided briefings and arguments for and against each policy. Content is reviewed by experts on different sides of the issues to ensure accuracy and balance.

Criminalizing abortion

Large bipartisan majorities in every swing state do not want abortion to be criminalized before fetal viability (73 percent to 80 percent), including Republicans (57 percent to 70 percent) and Democrats (83 percent to 93 percent), as well as 77 percent nationally.

publicconsultation.org

Before making their decision, respondents were informed that criminalizing abortion means prison time or fines for the doctor or the woman. After evaluating strong arguments for and against criminalizing abortion, respondents could choose to make abortion a crime 1) at all stages of pregnancy, 2) only after 15 weeks, 3) only after fetal viability (22-24 weeks), or 4) not make abortion a crime at any stage of pregnancy.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In Arizona and Nevada, there will be measures on the 2024 ballot to prevent the government from criminalizing abortion before fetal viability. In both states, bipartisan majorities of 80 percent do not want abortion to be a crime before viability, including seven in 10 Republicans and nine in 10 Democrats.

Smaller but still robust majorities go further and oppose criminalizing abortion at any stage of pregnancy: 61 percent to 70 percent in the swing states, including large majorities of Democrats (73 percent to 85 percent) and small majorities of Republicans in Arizona, Michigan and Nevada (52 percent to 55 percent). Among Republicans in Georgia, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, it is less than half (41 percent to 48 percent). Nationally, two-thirds take this position, including eight in 10 Democrats and half of Republicans.

Support for criminalizing abortion at all stages of pregnancy is just 7 percent to 13 percent in the swing states, including just 10 percent to 25 percent of Republicans and 3 percent to 7 percent of Democrats. Nationally, support is just 11 percent (Republicans, 19 percent; Democrats 5 percent).

Public overestimation of support for criminalizing all abortions

Respondents were asked to estimate what percent of Americans support criminalizing abortion at all stages of pregnancy. In all swing states and nationally, the majority estimated 35 percent or more. The actual level of support for that policy is just 11 percent nationally.

Making abortion law federal or leaving it up to states

After choosing which abortion law they favor, respondents were asked whether they want their preferred option to be a federal law that applies nationwide, or only the law in their own state with every other state able to have their own law.

Large majorities in every swing state favor having a federal law (68 percent to 73 percent). This includes majorities of Republicans in five of the swing states (58 percent to 66 percent), but just under half in Nevada (48 percent) — an 18-point spread across states. Among Democrats in the swing states, 76 percent to 87 percent want a federal law. Nationally, 70 percent take this position (Republicans, 56 percent; Democrats, 82 percent).

Bar graphic showing support for making abortion policy a federal law that applies to all statespublicconsultation.org

Majorities nationally support a federal law irrespective of their preference for what the law should be. This includes the full range from those who want to criminalize abortion at any stage of pregnancy to those who oppose any criminalization.

Ensuring access to birth control

Policies that seek to reduce unintended pregnancies and abortions through access to birth control receive large majority support among Republicans and Democrats in every swing state, and nationally.

Requiring all public schools to provide education about birth control is supported by 80 percent to 84 percent in the swing states, including Republicans (74 percent to 80 percent) and Democrats (86 percent to 93 percent), as well as 80 percent nationally.

publicconsultation.org

Ensuring nationwide access to birth control, by prohibiting state governments from restricting or banning birth control, is supported by 80 percent to 85 percent in the swing states, including Republicans (71 percent to 81 percent) and Democrats (86 percent to 93 percent), as well as 81 percent nationally.

publicconsultation.org

Continuing the Affordable Care Act mandate — that most insurance plans cover long-term birth control, such as the pill and IUDs — is supported by 85 percent to 90 percent in the swing states, including Republicans (76 percent to 87 percent) and Democrats (91 percent to 96 percent), as well as 85 percent nationally.

Increasing funding for health care clinics so they can provide long-term birth control for free or at a low cost is supported by 78 percent to 80 percent in the swing states, including 66 percent to 71 percent of Republicans and 88 percent to 93 percent of Democrats, as well as 76 percent nationally.

“Large bipartisan majorities want to greatly limit the role of government when it comes to abortion, but they do want the government to actively ensure access to birth control,” said Steven Kull, director of the Program for Public Consultation.

Trying to reduce abortions through mandatory ultrasounds and waiting periods

Respondents were asked about methods for trying to reduce abortions by putting more requirements on the process of getting an abortion, as has been done in several states. Views vary across the swing states, with less than half in support nationally. Majorities of Republicans are generally in support, while majorities of Democrats are opposed.

Requiring doctors to show an ultrasound of the fetus to the woman before providing the abortion is supported by a majority only in Georgia (57 percent) and, barely, in Wisconsin (51 percent), and by less than half in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania (44 percent to 46 percent). Among Republicans in the swing states, 52 percent to 66 percent are in favor, while among Democrats just 26 percent to 49 percent are in favor. Nationally, 48 percent favor this requirement (Republicans, 60 percent; Democrats, 36 percent), while 52 percent oppose it.

Requiring a waiting period of 1-3 days before receiving an abortion is supported by a majority only in Georgia (54 percent), by half in Michigan and Wisconsin, and by less than half in Arizona, Nevada and Pennsylvania (43 percent to 48 percent). Among Republicans, majorities in five of the swing states are in favor (58 percent to 67 percent), but just under half in Nevada (49 percent). Among Democrats in the swing states, just 31 percent to 44 percent are in favor. Nationally, 44 percent are in favor (Republicans, 59 percent; Democrats, 33 percent) and 54 percent opposed.

Read More

Latino man standing at the counter in a bakery

"Trump wants to bring jobs back to America. For us, this means more work here and for our community,” says Joge Sactic, who owns a bakery just outside Washington, D.C.

Beatrice M. Spadacini

Small-business owner prioritizes immigration in this year’s election

Spadacini is an Italian American freelance journalist who writes about social justice and public health.

The Fulcrum presents We the People, a series elevating the voices and visibility of the persons most affected by the decisions of elected officials. In this installment, we explore the motivations of over 36 million eligible Latino voters as they prepare to make their voices heard in November.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump and Kamala Harris debating

Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris debate on Sept. 10.

Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The state of our nation: Polling Americans’ priorities for election 2024

Originally published by The 19th.

This is the third annual poll from The 19th and SurveyMonkey, designed to shed light on what women, particularly women of color, and LGBTQ+ people think about the issues animating our politics. It comes as Americans face another critical election, one that could make Democrat Kamala Harris the first woman to hold the country’s highest office or give Republican Donald Trump a second term. Here’s what we learned about how Americans view the candidates, as well as opinions on abortion and on reproductive care more broadly, the ability to access gender-affirming care and more.

Keep ReadingShow less
Taylor Swift

Taylor Swift made another call for peopleto register to vote at the Video Music Awards on Thursday.

Christopher Polk/Billboard via Getty Images

What will Taylor Swift's endorsement of Kamala Harris mean?

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

On Sep 11, we reported in The Fulcrum thatTaylor Swift had entered the political fray by endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris for president of the United States. I ended the article by stating that “the full extent of her impact remains to be seen.”

Now only a few days later, some data is already suggesting the impact could be significant. The day after Swift endorsed Harris there was a significant surge of visitors to Vote.gov, the U.S. government website that helps citizens understand how they can register to vote. According to a spokesperson for the Government Services Administration, Swift’s endorsement on Instagram led directly to 337,826 people visiting the site.

Keep ReadingShow less
I Voted stickers
BackyardProduction/Getty Images

Voters cast ballots based on personal perceptions, not policy stances

The Fulcrum and the data analytics firm Fidelum Partners have just completed a nationally representative study assessing the voting intentions of U.S adults and their perceptions toward 18 well-known celebrities and politicians.

Fidelum conducted similar celebrity and politician election studies just prior to the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. Each of these found that perceptions of warmth, competence and admiration regarding the candidates are highly predictive of voting intentions and election outcomes. Given this, The Fulcrum and Fidelum decided to partner on a 2024 celebrity and politician election study to build upon the findings of prior research.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latino attendees of the Democratic National Convention

People cheer for the Harris-Walz ticket at the Democratic National Convention.

Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Harris’ nomination ‘hit a reset button’ for Latinas supporting Democrats

As the presidential race entered the summer months, President Joe Biden’s level of support among Latinx voters couldn’t match the winning coalition he had built in 2020. Among Latinas, a critical group of voters who tend to back Democrats at higher levels than Latinos, lagging support had begun to worry Stephanie Valencia, who studies voting patterns among Latinx voters across the country for Equis Research, a data analytics and research firm.

Then the big shake-up happened: Biden stepped down and Vice President Kamala Harris took his place at the top of the Democratic ticket fewer than 100 days before the election.

Valencia’s team quickly jumped to action. The goal was to figure out how the move was sitting with Latinx voters in battleground states that will play an outsized role in deciding the election. After surveying more than 2,000 Latinx voters in late July and early August, Equis found a significant jump in support for the Democratic ticket, a shift that the team is referring to as “the Latino Reset.”

Keep ReadingShow less