Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

In swing states, R's and D's oppose criminalizing abortion before fetal viability

Abortion rights protestors

Arizona residents rally for abortion rights in April, on the heels of the state Supreme Court decision enacting an 1864 law banning abortion.

Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

While policymakers argue over whether abortion should be a right or a crime, the public has a clear policy stance on the matter. A new survey in the six swing states finds that majorities of Republicans and Democrats oppose criminalizing abortion before fetal viability.

Furthermore, bipartisan majorities favor reducing unintended pregnancies and abortions through policies ensuring access to birth control.


This survey by the University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation is the fifth in the Swing Six Issue Surveys series, being conducted in the run-up to the November election in six swing states, and nationally, on major policies. Unlike traditional polls, respondents in a public consultation survey go through an online “policymaking simulation” in which they are provided briefings and arguments for and against each policy. Content is reviewed by experts on different sides of the issues to ensure accuracy and balance.

Criminalizing abortion

Large bipartisan majorities in every swing state do not want abortion to be criminalized before fetal viability (73 percent to 80 percent), including Republicans (57 percent to 70 percent) and Democrats (83 percent to 93 percent), as well as 77 percent nationally.

publicconsultation.org

Before making their decision, respondents were informed that criminalizing abortion means prison time or fines for the doctor or the woman. After evaluating strong arguments for and against criminalizing abortion, respondents could choose to make abortion a crime 1) at all stages of pregnancy, 2) only after 15 weeks, 3) only after fetal viability (22-24 weeks), or 4) not make abortion a crime at any stage of pregnancy.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In Arizona and Nevada, there will be measures on the 2024 ballot to prevent the government from criminalizing abortion before fetal viability. In both states, bipartisan majorities of 80 percent do not want abortion to be a crime before viability, including seven in 10 Republicans and nine in 10 Democrats.

Smaller but still robust majorities go further and oppose criminalizing abortion at any stage of pregnancy: 61 percent to 70 percent in the swing states, including large majorities of Democrats (73 percent to 85 percent) and small majorities of Republicans in Arizona, Michigan and Nevada (52 percent to 55 percent). Among Republicans in Georgia, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, it is less than half (41 percent to 48 percent). Nationally, two-thirds take this position, including eight in 10 Democrats and half of Republicans.

Support for criminalizing abortion at all stages of pregnancy is just 7 percent to 13 percent in the swing states, including just 10 percent to 25 percent of Republicans and 3 percent to 7 percent of Democrats. Nationally, support is just 11 percent (Republicans, 19 percent; Democrats 5 percent).

Public overestimation of support for criminalizing all abortions

Respondents were asked to estimate what percent of Americans support criminalizing abortion at all stages of pregnancy. In all swing states and nationally, the majority estimated 35 percent or more. The actual level of support for that policy is just 11 percent nationally.

Making abortion law federal or leaving it up to states

After choosing which abortion law they favor, respondents were asked whether they want their preferred option to be a federal law that applies nationwide, or only the law in their own state with every other state able to have their own law.

Large majorities in every swing state favor having a federal law (68 percent to 73 percent). This includes majorities of Republicans in five of the swing states (58 percent to 66 percent), but just under half in Nevada (48 percent) — an 18-point spread across states. Among Democrats in the swing states, 76 percent to 87 percent want a federal law. Nationally, 70 percent take this position (Republicans, 56 percent; Democrats, 82 percent).

Bar graphic showing support for making abortion policy a federal law that applies to all statespublicconsultation.org

Majorities nationally support a federal law irrespective of their preference for what the law should be. This includes the full range from those who want to criminalize abortion at any stage of pregnancy to those who oppose any criminalization.

Ensuring access to birth control

Policies that seek to reduce unintended pregnancies and abortions through access to birth control receive large majority support among Republicans and Democrats in every swing state, and nationally.

Requiring all public schools to provide education about birth control is supported by 80 percent to 84 percent in the swing states, including Republicans (74 percent to 80 percent) and Democrats (86 percent to 93 percent), as well as 80 percent nationally.

publicconsultation.org

Ensuring nationwide access to birth control, by prohibiting state governments from restricting or banning birth control, is supported by 80 percent to 85 percent in the swing states, including Republicans (71 percent to 81 percent) and Democrats (86 percent to 93 percent), as well as 81 percent nationally.

publicconsultation.org

Continuing the Affordable Care Act mandate — that most insurance plans cover long-term birth control, such as the pill and IUDs — is supported by 85 percent to 90 percent in the swing states, including Republicans (76 percent to 87 percent) and Democrats (91 percent to 96 percent), as well as 85 percent nationally.

Increasing funding for health care clinics so they can provide long-term birth control for free or at a low cost is supported by 78 percent to 80 percent in the swing states, including 66 percent to 71 percent of Republicans and 88 percent to 93 percent of Democrats, as well as 76 percent nationally.

“Large bipartisan majorities want to greatly limit the role of government when it comes to abortion, but they do want the government to actively ensure access to birth control,” said Steven Kull, director of the Program for Public Consultation.

Trying to reduce abortions through mandatory ultrasounds and waiting periods

Respondents were asked about methods for trying to reduce abortions by putting more requirements on the process of getting an abortion, as has been done in several states. Views vary across the swing states, with less than half in support nationally. Majorities of Republicans are generally in support, while majorities of Democrats are opposed.

Requiring doctors to show an ultrasound of the fetus to the woman before providing the abortion is supported by a majority only in Georgia (57 percent) and, barely, in Wisconsin (51 percent), and by less than half in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania (44 percent to 46 percent). Among Republicans in the swing states, 52 percent to 66 percent are in favor, while among Democrats just 26 percent to 49 percent are in favor. Nationally, 48 percent favor this requirement (Republicans, 60 percent; Democrats, 36 percent), while 52 percent oppose it.

Requiring a waiting period of 1-3 days before receiving an abortion is supported by a majority only in Georgia (54 percent), by half in Michigan and Wisconsin, and by less than half in Arizona, Nevada and Pennsylvania (43 percent to 48 percent). Among Republicans, majorities in five of the swing states are in favor (58 percent to 67 percent), but just under half in Nevada (49 percent). Among Democrats in the swing states, just 31 percent to 44 percent are in favor. Nationally, 44 percent are in favor (Republicans, 59 percent; Democrats, 33 percent) and 54 percent opposed.

Read More

Women voting
Edmond Dantès

Voters are no less anxious about elections now than they were in 2020

Reid-Vanas is a clinical therapist at, and founder of, Rocky Mountain Counseling Collective.

New research by Rocky Mountain Counseling Collective reveals that American voters are already experiencing more election anxiety in 2024 than they did on Election Day 2020 (typically the day of highest election anxiety). The findings come from analyzing the Household Pulse Survey, a collaboration between the Census Bureau and federal agencies.

At the height of the 2020 election, just over half (51 percent) of surveyed Americans reported experiencing anxiety.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hispanic family

Rafael Mendez and his family.

Courtesy Rafael Mendez

U.S. Hispanic voters: Breaking the monolith myth

Macias, a former journalist with NBC and CBS, owns the public relations agencyMacias PR.

The Fulcrum presents We the People, a series elevating the voices and visibility of the persons most affected by the decisions of elected officials. In this installment, we explore the motivations of over 36 million eligible Latino voters as they prepare to make their voices heard in November.

According to the Census Bureau, the Hispanic, Latino population makes up the largest racial or ethnic minority group in America. But this group is not a monolith. Macias explores providing a more accurate and nuanced understanding of this diverse population.

Several new political polls examine how Hispanic voters view former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. Not surprisingly, the polls are all over the place, even though they were taken around the same time.

Keep ReadingShow less
ballot envelope

Close-up of a 2020 mail-in ballot envelope for Maricopa County, Ariz.

Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images

Election Overtime Project kicks off state briefings in Arizona

The worsening political polarization in America is creating deep anxiety among voters about the upcoming 2024 elections. Many Americans fear what disputed elections could mean for our democracy. However, close and contested elections are a part of American history, and all states have processes in place to handle just such situations. It is critical citizens understand how these systems work so that they trust the results.

Trusted elections are the foundation of our democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
People protesting with a large banner that reads "Voters Decide"

Protesters in Detroit rally to support the 2020 election results and other causes.

Why the cost of water for poor Black Detroit voters may be key to Kamala Harris winning – or losing – Michigan

Ronald Brown is a professor of political science at Wayne State University. R. Khari Brown is a professor of sociology at Wayne State University.

The threat of violence was in the air at the TCF Center in Detroit on Nov. 5, 2020, after former President Donald Trump claimed that poll workers in the city were duplicating ballots and that there was an unexplained delay in delivering them for counting.

Both claims were later debunked.

Emboldened by Trump’s rhetoric, dozens of mainly white Republican Trump supporters banged on doors and windows at the vote-tallying center, chanting, “Stop the count!”

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman speaking at a podium

Shirley Chisholm speaks at the 1972 Democratic National Convention.

Bettmann/Getty Images

A reflection: How Kamala Harris is carrying the torch

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

As the 2024 presidential campaign season heats up, with Vice President Kamala Harris emerging as a formidable contender, it's a moment to reflect on the enduring power of the feminist mantra that has shaped generations of women in politics: "The personal is political."

This potent idea, popularized by trailblazers like Shirley Chisholm and bell hooks, continues to resonate through women's leadership actions today. It's particularly relevant in the context of the 2024 election, as we witness Harris' campaign and the unmistakable impact of her personal experiences on her political vision.

Keep ReadingShow less