Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

There’s a bipartisan chorus in the House for more election security money. But how much?

The bipartisan leadership of the House panel that oversees elections is unified about the need to do more to help states and localities secure voting systems against cyberattacks.

"Action is needed now to grasp the scope of the problem and to innovate concrete solutions" in time for November 2020, Chairwoman Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat, said at Wednesday's hearing of the House Administration Committee. "This goal will be a primary focus of this committee moving forward. No matter your side of the aisle, the oath of upholding democracy as citizens and elected leaders is fundamental."


Rodney Davis of Illinois, the committee's top Republican, said he takes "the responsibility of ensuring fair and secure elections extremely seriously" and that Russian interference in the 2016 election was "troubling," The Hill reported.

How much Congress allocates to the problem in the coming months is very much up in the air, however. The $380 million appropriated last fall and since distributed across the country has not come close to fulfilling all the states' needs for enhanced technology. Replacing the election systems in Pennsylvania alone would cost $100 million.

Read More

Similarity Hub Shows >700 Instances of Cross-Partisan Common Ground

Two coloured pencils one red and one blue drawing a reef knot on a white paper background.

Getty Images, David Malan

Similarity Hub Shows >700 Instances of Cross-Partisan Common Ground

It is a common refrain to say that Americans need to find common ground across the political spectrum.

Over the past year, AllSides and More Like US found >700 instances of common ground on political topics, revealed in Similarity Hub. It highlights public opinion data from Gallup, Pew Research, YouGov, and many other reputable polling firms.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Refines Military Strategy in Africa As Development Programs Face Cuts

Royal Moroccan Armed Forces service members and U.S. Army Soldiers hold an African Lion banner during a Moroccan F-16 flyover at the closing day of African Lion 2025 (AL25) at Tantan, Morocco, May 23, 2025.

By Sgt. 1st Class Andrew Mallett/U.S. Army Southern European Task Force, Africa

U.S. Refines Military Strategy in Africa As Development Programs Face Cuts

WASHINGTON – Both the Trump administration and its critics agree the U.S. risks losing influence in Africa to rivals like China and Russia. But while the administration argues its commercially driven foreign policy will reverse the trend, critics warn that retreating from development and diplomacy could deepen the problem.

Under the Trump administration, the U.S. plans to consolidate embassies, scale back USAID operations, and pivot towards a security and commercial driven approach on the continent. While U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) defense officials insist their core missions within Africa will remain intact, civilian experts and lawmakers argue that abandoning diplomatic and development tools opens the door for strategic competitors to fill the void and fails to take into account what would best benefit African countries.

Keep ReadingShow less