Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

GOP has new election security bill for gridlocked House

Election security gridlock
stuartmiles99/Getty Images

House Republicans have proposed subjecting registration systems, electronic poll books and other election hardware to the same certification system that covers voting machines.

The legislation, introduced Wednesday, marks a rare if modest effort by the congressional GOP to impose more federal sway over the conduct of elections, which is largely left to the states and thousands of localities. It is almost certain to be ignored by the Democratic majority in the House, which is after much more comprehensive regulation.


The bill was proposed in the name of bolstering election security by Rodney Davis of Illinois, the GOP's senior member on the House Administration Committee, which has jurisdiction over election law, and the panel's two other Republicans.

It would be the first update of the law setting initial federal election standards, known as the Help America Vote Act, since its enactment almost two decades ago in response to the ballot disputes central to the intensely contested 2000 presidential election.

While the GOP measure has little chance in the House, it does contain some of the elements in the election security package, dubbed the SAFE Act, that Democrats pushed through the House with just a single GOP vote last summer. That legislation has not been considered in the Republican Senate.

Davis, with co-sponsorship of more than 50 fellow Republicans, introduced an election security bill last June that had some of the same elements as his new bill. His previous legislation also called for more transparency in reporting cases of hacking into election systems, among other provisions. No action has been taken on that bill.

Davis said his new measure would direct the Election Assistance Commission to establish an advisory committee on setting guidelines for non-voting election hardware — and then require the commission to write those guidelines.

While the voting equipment guidelines written and administered by the commission are legally voluntary, many states now require their own machines be certified to the EAC standards.

The bill would also establish a new office to connect state and local elections officials with election administration and cybersecurity experts from across the country.

Non-voting equipment includes electronic poll books used to check in people when they arrive a voting site; online voter registration databases, and election night reporting systems.

Some of these systems were targeted by Russian hackers during the 2016 election. One of their few successes was breaking into the voter registration database for the state of Illinois and viewing personal information of thousands of voters. No registrations were removed or changed.


Read More

With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

Should the U.S. nationalize elections? A constitutional analysis of federalism, the Elections Clause, and the risks of centralized control over voting systems.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Why Nationalizing Elections Threatens America’s Federalist Design

The Federalism Question: Why Nationalizing Elections Deserves Skepticism

The renewed push to nationalize American elections, presented as a necessary reform to ensure uniformity and fairness, deserves the same skepticism our founders directed toward concentrated federal power. The proposal, though well-intentioned, misunderstands both the constitutional architecture of our republic and the practical wisdom in decentralized governance.

The Constitutional Framework Matters

The Constitution grants states explicit authority over the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, with Congress retaining only the power to "make or alter such Regulations." This was not an oversight by the framers; it was intentional design. The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Advocates for nationalization often cite the Elections Clause as justification, but constitutional permission is not constitutional wisdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

A voter registration drive in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Oct. 5, 2024. The deadline to register to vote for Texas' March 3 primary election is Feb. 2, 2026. Changes to USPS policies may affect whether a voter registration application is processed on time if it's not postmarked by the deadline.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

Texans seeking to register to vote or cast a ballot by mail may not want to wait until the last minute, thanks to new guidance from the U.S. Postal Service.

The USPS last month advised that it may not postmark a piece of mail on the same day that it takes possession of it. Postmarks are applied once mail reaches a processing facility, it said, which may not be the same day it’s dropped in a mailbox, for example.

Keep ReadingShow less
Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less
People voting at voting booths.

A little-known interstate compact could change how the U.S. elects presidents by 2028, replacing the Electoral College with the national popular vote.

Getty Images, VIEW press

The Quiet Campaign That Could Rewrite the 2028 Election

Most Americans are unaware, but a quiet campaign in states across the country is moving toward one of the biggest changes in presidential elections since the nation was founded.

A movement called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is happening mostly out of public view and could soon change how the United States picks its president, possibly as early as 2028.

Keep ReadingShow less