Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Coronavirus must not distract from need for fair elections

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot

Pool/Getty Images

The leadership shown by Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot has been tremendous, writes Madeleine Doubek. Such leadership is critical to ending partisan gerrymandering.
Doubek is executive director of CHANGE Illinois, which advocates for governmental and election reforms in the state. (The acronym is for the Coalition for Honest and New Government Ethics.)

One of the many things the coronavirus pandemic has underscored is that leadership truly does matter. It makes a huge difference. A life-and-death difference.

We've witnessed tremendous leadership recently from Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, Mayor Lori Lightfoot of Chicago and scores of other elected officials. We ought to take a moment to express our gratitude. Their work — and the long hours and work of their staff, and of the staff of local and state employees all over Illinois — will save lives and protect millions of us.

It will give us the opportunity to live freely again, to enjoy our lakefront and partake in contact sports. And to vote.

Yes, this crisis also has underscored that voting is critically important, as is having strong choices when we vote. Choosing those who will lead and represent us is absolutely essential. We saw it after 9/11 and we see it again now.


Nothing is more urgent now than getting as many of us as possible safely to the other side of this pandemic. We know this and we are grateful to our elected officials working every day to that end. And once we get there, there will be a tough cleanup for them — with budgets to repair and businesses and communities in need of shoring up.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Once all that is in hand, though, we also must commit to ensuring we can have the kind of elections we need so that we can have the best representation and leadership possible.

We need to make sure we have a full, accurate and complete census for all of Illinois. The pandemic is making that a greater challenge. That count is what will form the basis for the political mapping that happens just once a decade, creating the framework for our voting to determine who will represent us in Springfield and Washington.

We need an independent remapping process in place of the partisan gerrymandering we have now, which has politicians in power drawing districts and picking their own voters.

In the middle of a pandemic, talking about gerrymandering might seem like an unneeded distraction. But fixing this problem, before the opportunity closes for as long as 10 years, would go directly toward giving us the power we're supposed to have to determine for ourselves who leads and represents us.

In Illinois, gerrymandering has taken our voices and choices away at the ballot box. In 2018, about half of the races for state House and state Senate had only one candidate. When you factor in races won by a landslide margin, nearly 80 percent of our General Assembly races were not competitive.

We need competition so that we can ensure our elected leaders are responsive and accountable to us. We need to ensure that all of our diverse communities have the chance to elect people of their choosing.

Under our state Constitution, we only have until six months before the election to settle what questions will be on our Nov. 3 ballot. That deadline is just three and a half weeks from now, on May 3.

CHANGE Illinois and a collaborative of more than 30 diverse organizations statewide have been advocating for transparent, independent redistricting embodied in the Fair Maps Amendment.

If supermajorities of representatives and senators do not vote by May 3 to put this language to the ballot, we're likely doomed to have another collection of rigged maps generating hundreds of foregone elections for another decade. The chances now look slim.

But even if we don't make it next month, we will not stop. We cannot. We owe it to ourselves to advocate for the equitable representation we need.

We'll continue to fight and to push for redistricting that reflects all Illinoisans, not one political party's interests or another.

The pandemic reinforces for us more than ever that fair redistricting matters. That choice matters. That leadership matters.

Read More

Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Supreme Court
Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Gerrymandering and voting rights under review by Supreme Court again

On Dec. 13, The Fulcrum identified the worst examples of congressional gerrymandering currently in use.

In that news report, David Meyers wrote:

Keep ReadingShow less
Rear view diverse voters waiting for polling place to open
SDI Productions/Getty Images

Open primary advocates must embrace the historic principles of change

This was a big year for the open primaries movement. Seven state-level campaigns and one municipal. Millions of voters declaring their support for open primaries. New leaders emerging across the country. Primary elections for the first time at the center of the national reform debate.

But with six out of eight campaigns failing at the ballot box, it’s also an important moment of reflection.

Keep ReadingShow less