Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Independents will decide the election. What do we know about them?

Fisher is senior director of policy and partnerships for Unite America. Macomber is research manager for Unite America .

Whichever party wins independent voters will win the presidency and other key races this fall. A poll we at Unite America commissioned earlier this year provides clues for how Democrats and Republicans can appeal to these swing voters — including embracing their right to participate in all primary elections. Nearly 90 percent of independent voters from closed primary states support opening primaries, and nearly 60 percent said they would be more likely to vote for a party that pledged to support their right to vote in primaries.

A new bipartisan bill in Congress gives the parties a golden opportunity to do just that. The Let America Vote Act would immediately end closed primaries for congressional and presidential elections, while also providing financial incentives to states that enfranchise independents in state and local primaries. Currently, 15 states have closed congressional primaries, and 22 states have closed presidential primaries.


If passed, the Let America Vote Act would grant 23.5 million independent voters the same voting rights as registered Republicans and Democrats. According to Gallup’s most recent polling, a record high 51 percent of American adults identify as independents — more than the two major parties combined.

Simply providing lip service to a new bill is not enough, however. The two major parties must also understand why a rapidly growing share of voters choose to be independent in the first place. According to our first-of-its-kind report and poll of independents from closed primary states, there are four key reasons they do not affiliate with either party.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

  1. Independent voters are “independent thinkers.” Seventy percent said they “prefer to assess each candidate individually, rather than by their party affiliation,” while 68 percent said they “think for myself, independent of what parties and candidates tell me to think.”

    In response to an open-ended question, a 68-year-old man from Nevada echoed this sentiment: “I'm an independent thinker and willing to vote for anyone who reflects my beliefs.”

  2. Independents’ policy preferences do not align with the Democratic or Republican platforms. When asked which party they trust more to handle the pressing issues facing the country, independents were split. At least 60 percent placed more trust in the Republicans to handle immigration, the economy, and public safety, while the same share favored the Democrats on health care, abortion and climate issues.

    To illustrate how independents’ beliefs are split between the parties, consider this comment from a 79-year-old woman from Idaho: “Two main issues motivate me — 1. gun rights. 2. reproductive freedom. Neither party promotes both.”

  3. Independents believe the political system is broken. Nearly 70 percent of respondents said they believe the “political parties are too influenced by corporate interests or lobbyists,” while 65 percent said they believe “the political system is corrupt and needs significant reform.” A startling 91 percent agreedthat “Both major parties care more about serving their special interests than people like me.”

    A 39-year-old man from Utah underscored this feeling: “Politics are poison. My trust for the political system has soured with[in] the last 8 years. The voice of the people is very rarely heard and politicians are in the pockets of other businesses or affiliations.”
  1. Independents are disillusioned with the two major parties. Only 22 percent of respondents have a favorable view of the Republican Party, and 21 percent have a favorable opinion of the Democratic Party. Seventy percent also said that they believe “both parties are too ideologically extreme.”

    These beliefs were clearly expressed by a 67-year-old woman from Idaho: “I consider both parties off track. We need to get back to the middle ground. I am sick and tired of being whiplashed around by the extremists of both parties.”

In sum, independents are persuadable voters with nuanced policy positions who are frustrated by both the political system and the two parties that lead it. Passing the Let America Vote Act and opening all states’ primaries to independents would incentivize members of Congress to represent the views of independent voters while in office, and not allow them to just be an afterthought during election season. Without reform, though, the major parties will likely continue to struggle to appeal to independents, and voters will continue to abandon the parties.

Read More

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

Someone filling out a ballot.

Getty Images / Hill Street Studios

Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

In the 2024 U.S. election, several states did not pass ballot initiatives to implement Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) despite strong majority support from voters under 65. Still, RCV was defended in Alaska, passed by a landslide in Washington, D.C., and has earned majority support in 31 straight pro-RCV city ballot measures. Still, some critics of RCV argue that it does not enhance and promote democratic principles as much as forms of proportional representation (PR), as commonly used throughout Europe and Latin America.

However, in the U.S. many people have not heard of PR. The question under consideration is whether implementing RCV serves as a stepping stone to PR by building public understanding and support for reforms that move away from winner-take-all systems. Utilizing a nationally representative sample of respondents (N=1000) on the 2022 Cooperative Election Survey (CES), results show that individuals who favor RCV often also know about and back PR. When comparing other types of electoral reforms, RCV uniquely transfers into support for PR, in ways that support for nonpartisan redistricting and the national popular vote do not. These findings can inspire efforts that demonstrate how RCV may facilitate the adoption of PR in the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less