Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Voting rights expanded for 80,000 former prisoners in New Jersey

Voting rights expanded for 80,000 former prisoners in New Jersey

Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy signed a law Wednesday restoring the franchise to those on probation or parole.

Michael Loccisano/Getty Images

More than 80,000 people on parole or probation in New Jersey have had their voting rights restored.

Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy signed a bill Wednesday allowing formerly incarcerated felons to register to vote starting in March, well ahead of the state's presidential primary in June. The Democratic state Senate sent him the measure Wednesday following passage by the state House last month.

It's the latest in a growing roster of states that have expanded the political rights of people out of prison, a longtime cause of those in favor of both boosting turnout and promoting the reintegration of freed felons into society.


"These are residents who are living as full participants in their communities and yet have been needlessly prevented from having a voice in the future direction of their communities," Murphy said at a signing ceremony in Trenton.

Previously, the state required those convicted of criminal offenses to complete their post-release conditions before restoring their voting rights. New Jersey has now joined 16 states and Washington, D.C., in restoring the franchise upon release.

Murphy's signature is the latest in a string of actions taken in recent years in mostly Democratic states to restore voting rights to released felons, a significant portion of whom were disenfranchised by low-level drug possession convictions.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Gov. Andy Beshear signed an executive order right after taking office in Kentucky last week restoring voting rights to more than 140,000 nonviolent felons who had completed their sentences. Gov. Andrew Cuomo did the same last year for about 35,000 New Yorkers under parole supervision. And Gov. Terry McAuliffe restored voting rights to more than 170,000 nonviolent felons in Virginia from 2016 to 2018.

Also in 2018, Florida voters approved a state constitutional amendment to enfranchise an estimated 1.4 million released felons, leaving Iowa as the only state that permanently bars those with felony convictions from voting.

Read More

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

A roll of "voted" stickers.

Pexels, Element5 Digital

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

The analysis and parsing of learned lessons from the 2024 elections will continue for a long time. What did the campaigns do right and wrong? What policies will emerge from the new arrangements of power? What do the parties need to do for the future?

An equally important question is what lessons are there for our democratic structures and processes. One positive lesson is that voting itself was almost universally smooth and effective; we should applaud the election officials who made that happen. But, many elements of the 2024 elections are deeply challenging, from the increasingly outsized role of billionaires in the process to the onslaught of misinformation and disinformation.

Keep ReadingShow less
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less