Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

More than 100,000 Kentucky felons will get back the vote this year

Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear

Kentucky's new governor, Andy Beshear, said Tuesday he plans to reinstate voting rights for felons, following through on a campaign promise.

John Sommers II/Getty Images

Kentucky's new governor plans to sign an executive order Thursday restoring the vote to more than 100,000 convicted non-violent felons who have completed their sentences.

Andy Beshear, a Democrat and former state attorney general, made the announcement Tuesday in his inaugural address. It's the fulfillment of a promise that shaped the closing days of his campaign last fall, when he won an upset against Republican incumbent Matt Bevin.

"My faith teaches me to treat others with dignity and respect. My faith also teaches forgiveness," Beshear said, and so he will use his executive power to restore "voting rights to over 100,000 men and women who have done wrong in the past but are doing right now. They deserve to participate in our great democracy."


The new governor's move will be the largest restoration of voting rights for felons since Florida voters approved a measure last year granting the franchise to as many as 1.4 million who have finished prison, probation and parole. But a law enacted by the Legislature to place restrictions on felons' voting has tied up many of their new rights in state and federal courts.

Only Kentucky and Iowa permanently disenfranchise all felons unless the governor grants a reprieve — something that Bevin did in about 1,200 cases during his single term.

"By taking this step, by restoring these voting rights, we declare that everyone in Kentucky counts," Beshear said. "We all matter."

Beshear appears likely to reinstate an executive order signed in 2015 by his father, Democrat Steve Beshear, that was rescinded by Bevin, his successor. That order would have restored voting rights and the right to hold office to more than 140,000 Kentuckians who had completed their sentences and paid all court-ordered fines and restitution.

About one-quarter of the state's disenfranchised population is African-American, a significant portion of whom were convicted on non-violent drug possession charges, according to The Sentencing Project, which advocates for reducing racial disparities in the criminal justice system.

While the new wave of voters will likely vote solidly Democratic, they are unlikely to shift the state's balance of political power. President Trump can be confident of easily carrying the state, which he won by 30 points last time, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is solidly favored to win re-election

Bashear won by just over 5,000 votes, a margin of half a percentage point. Bevin opposed such a widespread restoration of voting rights. He said it would be an abuse of executive power and such a decision should be made by the Legislature.

Read More

A person in a military uniform holding a gavel.

As the Trump administration redefines “Warrior Ethos,” U.S. military leaders face a crucial test: defend democracy or follow unlawful orders.

Getty Images, Liudmila Chernetska

Warrior Ethos or Rule of Law? The Military’s Defining Moment

Does Secretary Hegseth’s extraordinary summoning of hundreds of U.S. command generals and admirals to a Sept. 30 meeting and the repugnant reinstatement of Medals of Honor to 20 participants in the infamous 1890 Wounded Knee Massacre—in which 300 Lakota Sioux men, women, and children were killed—foreshadow the imposition of a twisted approach to U.S. “Warrior Ethos”? Should military leaders accept an ethos that ignores the rule of law?

Active duty and retired officers must trumpet a resounding: NO, that is not acceptable. And, we civilians must realize the stakes and join them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Yes, They Are Trying To Kill Us
Provided

Yes, They Are Trying To Kill Us

In the rush to “dismantle the administrative state,” some insist that freeing people from “burdensome bureaucracy” will unleash thriving. Will it? Let’s look together.

A century ago, bureaucracy was minimal. The 1920s followed a worldwide pandemic that killed an estimated 17.4–50 million people. While the virus spread, the Great War raged; we can still picture the dehumanizing use of mustard gas and trench warfare. When the war ended, the Roaring Twenties erupted as an antidote to grief. Despite Prohibition, life was a party—until the crash of 1929. The 1930s opened with a global depression, record joblessness, homelessness, and hunger. Despair spread faster than the pandemic had.

Keep ReadingShow less