Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Stopping more Wisconsin election meltdowns subject of new suit

Wisconsin voters

Several Wisconsin voters and poll workers tested positive for Covid-19 after participating in the April presidential primary.

The Washington Post/Getty Images

Hoping to prevent a repeat of Wisconsin's plagued elections last month, a disability rights group is asking a federal judge to force sweeping changes allowing more absentee voting and ensuring safer polling places in time for the next primaries this summer.

The lawsuit, filed Monday, joins dozens across the country by Democrats and progressive advocacy groups working to ease restrictions on mail-in voting so that turnout remains robust despite the coronavirus pandemic. But the claims in Wisconsin carry special weight now — not only because the state is a presidential battleground but also because, as one expert quoted in the suit described it, Wisconsin's April primary was the biggest election failure since the Voting Rights Act was enacted in 1965.


The lawsuit asks the court to ensure in-person voting is safely conducted and an adequate number of poll workers are hired and trained to fully staff voting stations.

It also wants every registered voter to be sent forms for requesting absentee ballots for both the Aug. 11 congressional and legislative primaries and the Nov. 3 general election — and to compel the state to drop the requirement that absentee ballots be returned with a witness' signature.

The plaintiffs want to compel Wisconsin to start counting absentee ballots before Election Day and to count any ballot that is postmarked by Election Day and arrives at election offices within a week.

The suit was filed as the state Election Commission issued its postmortem on the spring primary. The report said the turnout of 1.6 million was the second-highest ever for such a contest, bested only by four years ago, when contested presidential nominations for both parties were on the ballot.

And 62 percent of the ballots (964,433, to be precise) were returned by mail — nearly six times the number of mail-in votes in any other state primary. Just 26 percent of votes were cast in person on April 7, with the remaining 12 percent cast early but in person.

The commission says that, if typical turnout patterns for a presidential general election hold, more than 1.8 million mail-in ballots could be requested for November — which would "present terrific challenges for Wisconsin election officials at all levels."

The suit is relying on some precedents benefiting voters, and combating others, that were set last month as conservative majorities on both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled on a flurry of lawsuits ahead of the primary.

Shortly before the April 7 voting, a federal judge ruled that absentee ballots postmarked by that day and arriving by April 13 would be counted. The judge also said people should be allowed to include with their absentee ballots a statement saying it was not safe to get a witness' signature. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the waiver of the signature requirement.

And after the GOP-majority Legislature refused Democratic Gov. Tony Evers' request for legislation delaying the election, he issued an executive order doing just that — which then got blocked by the state's top court. The nation's high court, however, did agree with the trial judge that absentee ballots should be counted so long as they were mailed by Election Day.

The day of the election, many polling sites were not open because workers did not show up. This left voters in masks and gloves standing in long lines, and subsequently several dozen of them, and several poll workers, have tested positive for Covid-19.

And a large number of absentee ballots never arrived at voters' homes and many completed ballots were not delivered in time to election offices.

All of these problems amounted to widespread violations of the Voting Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act along with the constitutional protections of free speech under the First Amendment and equal protection rights under the 14th Amendment, the lawsuit alleges, and must not be allowed to persist in the next elections.

The 70-page lawsuit was filed by Black Leaders Organizing for Communities, Disability Rights Wisconsin and three voters who faced life-and-death decisions about whether to vote because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Among them is 61-year-old Jill Swenson, who lives alone in Appleton and has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. She received an absentee ballot for the April 7 primary but was unable to get someone to countersign it without risking her health. She turned in the ballot anyway but it was not counted.

Several other lawsuits challenging Wisconsin's rules are already moving along in both state and federal court. The state's 10 electoral votes are central to both nominees this fall. President Trump won them by only 0.7 percentage points last time, the first GOP nominee to carry the state since 1984.


Read More

People at voting booths.

A clear breakdown of voter ID laws under the Constitution, federal statutes, and court rulings—plus analysis of new Trump administration proposals to impose nationwide voter identification requirements.

Getty Images, LPETTET

Just the Facts: Voter ID, States’ Powers, and Federal Limits

The Fulcrum approaches news stories with an open mind and skepticism, presenting our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.


Few issues generate more heat and are less understood than voter ID.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person signing a piece of paper with other people around them.

Javon Jackson, center, was able to register to vote following passage of a 2019 Nevada law that restored voting rights to formerly incarcerated individuals.

The Nation Is Missing Millions of Voters Due to Lack of Rights for Former Felons

If you gathered every American with a prison record into one contiguous territory and admitted it to the union, you would create the 12th-largest state. It would be home to at least 7 million to 8 million people and hold a dozen votes in the Electoral College.

In a close presidential race, this hypothetical state of the formerly incarcerated could decide who wins the White House.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

An analysis of Trump’s SAVE Act strategy, the voter ID debate, and how Pew data is being misused—exploring election integrity, voter suppression, and the political fight shaping U.S. democracy.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Stop Fighting Voter ID. Start Defining It.

President Trump doesn't need the SAVE America Act to pass. He only needs the debate to continue. Every minute spent arguing about voter suppression repeats the underlying premise — that noncitizen voting is a real and widespread problem — until it feels like an established fact. The question is whether Democrats will contest Republicans’ definition before the frame hardens.

Trump's claim that 88% of Americans support the bill traces to a Pew Research Center survey — a survey that found 83% support a “government-issued photo ID to vote,” not extreme vetting for proof of citizenship. That support included 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats, indicating genuine, broad, bipartisan support for a basic civic principle. That's worth taking seriously.

Keep ReadingShow less
People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less