Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

A new politics is needed

reforming politics
wildpixel/Getty Images

Molineaux is president/CEO of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, and Nevins is its co-founder and board chairman. They are co-publishers of The Fulcrum.

A new politics is needed for the United States to continue. Politics is our process of deciding who we trust to hold power. It is the power to guide our governance, to decide our collective priorities. In the last several decades, our politics has exhibited a raw struggle for power to dominate instead of to govern.

This is one reason we accepted stewardship of The Fulcrum, one year ago. As we celebrate our one-year anniversary as co-publishers, we highlight advances in the restoration of our ability to govern and point to areas that need improvement.


A year ago we told our readers that “we must harness the tension of our differences in order to strengthen the bond between us in order to empower Americans of all stripes in our movement.”

Throughout unforeseen events like a global pandemic, insurrection and the land-grab by Russia in Ukraine, we have seen the strain on our checks and balances. Without accountability by the voters and judicial system, will our checks and balances hold? The increasing polarization is plaguing the ability of our democracy to survive. Throughout the last year, we have stood fast by the principles that are the basis for our philosophy of self-governance. We believe we are better as a nation when we collaborate, embrace differences, focus on solutions, and are open minded all ensuring that Americans are informed and active. This is the foundation of a just and healthy democracy where everyone has the opportunity to thrive.

The continued belief by many in falsehoods around the November 2020 election create a justifiable fear that the electorate will be enticed by autocratic rhetoric. That many believers are running for office in 2022 could result in our country departing from the sacred principles of our Constitution. Yet we believe there is reason for hope.

A recent Harvard/Harris Poll shows a majority of Americans believe our nation is on the wrong track and that neither Joe Biden nor Donald Trump should run for a second term. Additionally 58 percent indicated they would consider a moderate presidential candidate if given such an option.

A majority of Americans clearly want something better. If offered the opportunity we believe that citizens will elect leaders who are direct and honest in public statements putting ethical commitments above partisan or career objectives. We believe that when given the choice, citizens want our elected representative to engage constructively rather than dehumanizing each other with polarizing rhetoric.

Before running for office, two 2022 candidates worked in the electoral reform space, advocating for “country over party” thinking through the Millennial Action Project (helping elect young people to office) and Stand Up Republic (a center-right advocacy group focused on leadership).

For instance, Stand Up Republic co-founder Evan McMullin is running a unique Senate campaign in Utah. This could serve as a test of a new politics that puts country before party. The state Democratic Party will not be nominating a candidate to run against Republican Sen. Mike Lee, instead throwing its supportto McMullin, an independent. After receiving the partys’ support, McMullin said:

"Democrats are putting country over party. We have got to take a stand as Utahns. I don't care if you're a Democrat or or an independent or a Republican or a member of the United Utah Party, this is a line that cannot be crossed, our right to hold our leaders accountable and to vote for or against them and have a peaceful transition of power is essential for liberty and justice in America."

Another interesting Senate race is taking place in Wisconsin. Former MAP CEO Steven Olikara, who is seeking the Democratic nomination, believes a new politics is needed for the times we live in, and he has personally worked for many years with state legislators from both parties to “create a more honest and inclusive politics - one that centers on dignity for all.”

The Harvard/Harris poll will soon be put to the test. Will a coalition of moderates form to support these two Senate candidates? And if they win, will McMullin and Olikara help restore the conviction to govern with the common good in mind, instead of raw political power to dominate policy making?

As we celebrate our anniversary of becoming co-publishers of The Fulcrum, we are excited to report on the course-correction underway in our country. Even if we can’t quite see it yet.


Read More

An illustration of the U.S. flag on the shape of the U.S. with blue and red figures of people across it.

Every state has its own constitution.

How State Constitutions Became the Battleground for American Rights and Liberties – on Both the Left and Right

Beyond picking governors, state legislators, local officials and representatives to serve in Congress, voters in almost every state this year will have the opportunity to amend the language of their state constitution. In one state, they could potentially rewrite the constitution altogether.

Though the U.S. Constitution is rarely amended, voters frequently amend their state constitutions. In every election cycle, voters are asked to ratify constitutional amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors holding signs at a rally, one reads, "Trump is not above the law."

Protesters gather at a Nobody Is Above the Law rally protesting President Trump's interference in the Mueller investigation on November 08, 2018 in Washington, DC.

Larry French/Getty Images

The Double Standard Presidency: When We Watch Leaders Act Above the Law

Americans are told that no one is above the law. Yet every day, they watch a president behave in ways that would get any ordinary citizen fired, disciplined, confronted, or held accountable — and they watch some Americans excuse it. What makes this moment even more striking is that critics across the political spectrum, including conservatives, now warn that the presidency is operating on a dangerous double standard. This is not a partisan concern. It is a constitutional one. And it is tearing at the fabric of our democracy.

For generations, the Constitution has provided guardrails — separation of powers, checks and balances, oversight mechanisms, and limits on executive authority — designed to prevent any leader from functioning above the law. The framers feared concentrated power more than anything else. They believed that the presidency must be constrained not only by written law but by norms of restraint, dignity, and respect for institutions. Those norms held for centuries because presidents understood that the office was larger than any individual, and Congress understood that oversight was not optional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Latino immigrants and U.S.-born Latinos differ sharply in how much their identity shapes their daily lives, according to recent findings from the Pew Research Center’s 2025 National Survey of Latinos. The survey shows that Latino immigrants are far more likely than U.S.-born Latinos to say their identity is central to who they are, and that it influences their experiences in the United States. Pew researchers Gabriel Piña, Mark Hugo Lopez, Sahana Mukherjee, Dalia Fahmy, and Alexandra Cahn report that the divide reflects differences in cultural connection, lived experience, and generational distance from immigrant roots.

Pew’s analysis finds that Latino immigrants are significantly more likely to say their origins are central to their identity, while U.S.-born Latinos — especially those in the third generation or higher — are less likely to feel that connection. The report notes that “U.S. Hispanics are divided on whether their identity helps or hurts them in America,” with some respondents describing their Latino identity as a source of pride and connection, and others saying it is tied to discrimination or barriers.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Clerk Matthew Sandbar, 34, demonstrates part of the ballot-sorting process to members of the media attending a walkthrough of the Philadelphia Ballot Processing Center used to process the ballots of the 2022 US midterm elections, in Philadelphia on October 27, 2022.

Photo by Ryan Collerd / AFP via Getty Images

A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Tallying the results of Washington, DC’s first ranked-choice election in June took about 10 days—longer than many voters are used to. In an age when artificial intelligence can generate an answer in seconds, waiting days for election results can feel old-fashioned, inefficient, even suspicious. And it is about to matter far more widely. This November, 17 states, cities, and counties will use ranked-choice voting, including Maine and Alaska statewide, in races that could help decide control of Congress. More voters than ever will watch results take days to resolve, and more will be asked to trust a count they cannot see.

But that slowness may be one of its most democratic features.

Keep ReadingShow less