Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Why I've signed on to run a new political party that spans the ideological divide

David Jolly

Former Rep. David Jolly

Michael S. Schwartz/Getty Images)

Jolly is the new executive chairman of the Serve America Movement, also known as the SAM Party. He was a Republican congressman from Florida from 2014 to 2017 but quit that party the next year.


As a new era has begun in American politics, the always gracious Joe Biden was right to promise in his inaugural address that, while elected as a Democrat, he intends to serve all Americans. That is, after all, the calling of public office and of public service. Americans from all walks of life, including myself, wish him great success as he assumes his awesome responsibility.

As president, Biden will set the agenda and his Democratic colleagues on Capitol Hill will work to advance that agenda. Republicans, after losing the presidency and both chambers of Congress, will inevitably serve as a formidable opposition party. And millions of Americans, for varying reasons, will continue to wonder if there is any way to solve our endless partisanship.

There is. The United States is in the minority among leading nations in having an entrenched political duopoly — just two major parties, insulated from accountability by a campaign finance system that rewards their mutual power and protected by election rules deliberately implemented to limit challenges by independent candidates or new parties.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Conversely, many nations have rich multi-party democracies, and research continually affirms they produce more inclusive policy outcomes, greater voter engagement and satisfaction, and better participation of both political and demographic minorities.

This contrast is made more relevant today as the Republican Party wrestles with its future. Conservatives continue to chatter about either "reclaiming" the GOP from the angry populism of Donald Trump, or starting a new party altogether based on rigid ideological principles. Trump himself has reportedly discussed launching a new party in his self-proclaimed image, flirting with the prospect of a Patriot Party rooted in his America First platform.

Democrats, though united in victory, continue to wrestle with the ideological diversity that strains all major political parties. Indeed, it was widely reported that following the Democrats' loss of House seats last fall, moderates and progressives in the caucus clashed on a three-hour call about which members, and which message, bore responsibility for the losses. Those clashes will inevitably continue.

But our political problem is not one of ideology. In fact, one of the greatest blessings of America is that we live in a society where competing ideologies can be openly debated. We are made better by thought leaders who push the boundaries of new policy ideas and test them against our collective political interests.

If we are to be truthful about our politics, we need to recognize that Trump's populism resonated with 74 million people. It gave voice to many who felt they had been left behind. It is also true that progressives were aghast at the policy and leadership decisions of the last four years. That anger and conviction motivated enough of the country to demand a change of direction.

These conflicting truisms apply within our major parties as well. Moderates in the House Democratic Caucus have been elevated by a constituency that chose a centrist ideology, just as the progressives have been elevated by a constituency that wants to move left. So too for Republicans: The most conservative members elevated by the most right-leaning constituencies, and the more moderate members by more centrist constituencies.

No, the problem is not the diversity of our ideologies. The problem — the fatal flaw in today's American political system — is that there is not a political party structured to accommodate our diverse ideologies.

Which is why the next successful party will not be one that defines itself by claiming a spot on the ideological spectrum. It will have a big tent platform that welcomes progressives, conservatives, moderates and single-issue voters. It will coalesce these competing perspectives around shared values of problem solving, democracy protection, election reform and accountability.

The Serve America Movement is one such party. A coalition of current and former Democrats, Republicans and independents, SAM has run or endorsed candidates at the local and state levels in Connecticut and New York, including unity tickets for governor and lieutenant governor. Our regional task forces have advanced significant electoral reform initiatives and continue to speak to the value of ideas like ranked-choice voting, primaries open to all voters and gerrymandering reform. The party is growing and will be endorsing and running more candidates next year and in 2024.

Whether SAM holds the keys to disrupting our system, let us not miss this opportunity to rethink how we approach politics. For too long, we have needlessly limited ourselves by subscribing to politics only through the lens of left, right and center. The truth is our nation's most pressing problems can be solved through policy prescriptions found all along the left-right spectrum.

Show me a political party willing to recognize that health care can be strengthened through both a strong public option and a true and robust private option; that public education deserves greater investment but students and parents also deserve choice; that immigration policy can include border security but also a pathway to dignity and citizenship for those who desire it; and that the rights of responsible gun owners and our obligation to public safety can both be secured through greater regulation.

Show me that political party and I'll show you a governing majority for the coming decades.

For now, the two major parties will continue to provide a political home rooted in rigid left-right ideology, as will minor parties like the Greens and Libertarians. Perhaps a new conservative party indeed emerges from today's GOP, or a new populist party under Trump. But for many Americans, the SAM Party is providing a new political home.

Our next successful party won't be bound by the dictates of ideology, it will be bound by the dictates of conscience. And it will reflect incredible diversity of thought, a remarkable spirit of cooperation — and a resolve to forever disrupt the politics that our Founders forewarned us about, and that today leave so many behind.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less