Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Florida is on the verge of banning ranked-choice voting

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis

When Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signs the bill creating a new election crimes unit, he will also be outlawing ranked-choice voting.

SOPA Images/Getty Images

When Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signs a bill establishing a new investigative unit focused on election crimes, he will also be banning ranked-choice voting in his state.

The “elections police” elements of the bill, which received final approval from the Republican-led Legislature on Wednesday, has received the most attention, but when the bill becomes law Florida will quietly become the second Southern state to prohibit RCV in recent weeks.


The battle of RCV has been going on for a number of years. In 2007, the people of Sarasota voted to use RCV in future municipal elections but state officials argued it was illegal under Florida law, as well as unconstitutional.

An RCV campaign was launched in Jacksonville in 2019 and in 2021 the Clearwater City Council made plans for a ballot proposition that would allow the city to switch to ranked-choice elections.

But the new law, once enacted, will make all those decisions moot.

Florida’s course of action closely mirrors the action in Tennessee, where Gov. Bill Lee signed a bill March 2 that bans RCV in his state. As in Florida, the law settles a dispute between the state and the voters of a major city that had been going on for more than a decade.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In 2008, the voters of Memphis opted to switch to RCV but the change was first held while the voting equipment was reviewed to ensure it could handle ranked-choice voting and then again when the state fought the switch.

“Outside of this setback, ranked-choice voting continues to be the fastest-growing nonpartisan voting reform across the nation,” Brian Cannon, director of advocacy for Fairvote, said after the Florida Legislature acted. “Both the Tennessee and Florida measures are part of larger efforts unrelated to RCV — the Tennessee bill is one of many limiting local control in Memphis, while the Florida measure is one part of the controversial omnibus elections bill.”

In addition to creating an Office of Election Crimes and Security within the Department of State, the Florida bill also increases the penalties for submitting ballots on behalf of other voters (what’s known as “ballot harvesting”) and voter registration violations, further tightens the rules on private funding of election administration and requires more frequent reviews of voter rolls.

Voter fraud and other election crimes are rare. DeSantis himself praised the integrity of the 2020 election in Florida, citing mandatory audits.

“It passed with flying colors in terms of how that’s going,” he said in October 2021.

Critics have seized on past Republican comments to bolster their opposition to the bill.

“Not too long ago, Florida Republicans held up the state’s handling of the 2020 election as the ‘gold standard.’ Today, they used false claims of electoral fraud to ram this anti-democratic bill through the state legislature,” said Monica Garcia, managing director of the progressive voter advocacy organization Stand Up America.

According to Cannon, there is one other state where a bill has been introduced to ban RCV: California. The bill has a single sponsor, a retiring Democrat. Ranked-choice voting has been used in San Francisco since 2004 and other Bay Area cities including Oakland since 2010. Two small California cities are expected to use it for the first time this year, along with Alaska.

In a ranked-choice election, voters mark their preferred candidates in order of preference. If no one receives a majority, the candidate with the fewest top votes is eliminated and their support is redistributed to voters’ second choices. The process continues until someone has a majority.

Advocates for RCV, such as the people at Fairvote, argue that ranked elections ensure the winning candidate has the support of a majority of voters (which often does not happen in a traditional race with more than two candidates), promotes more civil campaigns because candidates need to appeal beyond their base, and boosts participation while saving money by eliminating the need for runoff elections.

“A number of Florida cities hold their runoffs within four weeks of the general election, effectively disenfranchising military voters serving overseas from participating in the runoff,” Cannon noted.

Advocates are continuing to push what they call “the fastest-growing reform in the nation.”

By November 2021, more than 40 jurisdictions were using RCV and the number could reach 50 this year. Utah, where 20 cities used RCV in its last election, has been looking at an expansion; Burlington, Vermont’s largest city will debut RCV next year, and Missouri may put it to voters this fvall.

Read More

Following Jefferson: Promoting Intergenerational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

An illustration depicting the U.S. Constitution and Government.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

Following Jefferson: Promoting Intergenerational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

Towards the end of his life, Thomas Jefferson became fatalistic. The prince and poet of the American Revolution brooded—about the future of the country he birthed, to be sure; but also about his health, his finances, his farm, his family, and, perhaps most poignantly, his legacy. “[W]hen all our faculties have left…” he wrote to John Adams in 1822, “[when] every avenue of pleasing sensation is closed, and athumy, debility, and malaise [is] left in their places, when the friends of our youth are all gone, and a generation is risen around us whom we know not, is death an evil?”

The question was rhetorical, of course. But it revealed something about his character. Jefferson was aware that Adams and he—the “North and South poles of the Revolution”—were practically the only survivors of the Revolutionary era, and that a new generation was now in charge of America’s destiny.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Hidden Moral Cost of America’s Tariff Crisis

Small business owner attaching permanent close sign on the shop door.

Getty Images, Kannika Paison

The Hidden Moral Cost of America’s Tariff Crisis

In the spring of 2025, as American families struggle with unprecedented consumer costs, we find ourselves at a point of "moral reckoning." The latest data from the Yale Budget Lab reveals that tariff policies have driven consumer prices up by 2.9% in the short term. In comparison, the Penn Wharton Budget Model projects a staggering 6% reduction in long-term GDP and a 5% decline in wages. But these numbers, stark as they are, tell only part of the story.

The actual narrative is one of moral choice and democratic values. Eddie Glaude describes this way in his book “Democracy in Black”: Our economic policies must be viewed through the lens of ethical significance—not just market efficiency. When we examine the tariff regime's impact on American communities, we see economic data points and a fundamental challenge to our democratic principles of equity and justice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Balance – The Golden Mean

Old empty scales in brass colour against grey background.

Getty Images, OsakaWayne Studios

Balance – The Golden Mean

“Next to love, balance is the most important thing.” ~ John Wooden

Would John Wooden, UCLA’s winningest basketball coach, who took his team to ten national championships in 12 years and was named the “Coach of the Century” by ESPN, speak so of “love” and “balance” if they were not absolutely critical to a winning formula?

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding The Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)

Judge gavel and book on the laptop

Getty Images/Stock

Understanding The Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)

Background

In November 2024, Elon Musk posted on social media, “There should be no need for [Freedom of Information Act] requests. All government data should be default public for maximum transparency.” His statement reignited discussions on the Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, a federal law enacted in 1966 that requires federal executive branch agencies to disclose information in specific ways. Since its original passage in 1966, FOIA has been updated three times to tighten agency compliance, account for digital records, and allow citizens to request records online. Under FOIA, government agencies must disclose information by:

FOIA includes nine exemptions to protect against harms that might result from divulging certain records; these exemptions include cases like invasion of personal privacy, information related to national security, and information that would interfere with law enforcement proceedings.

Keep ReadingShow less