Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

VA Announces Record Efficiency Amid Potential Staffing Cuts

News

VA Announces Record Efficiency Amid Potential Staffing Cuts

The Committee on Veterans’ Affairs hearing room in the Cannon House Office Building on April 9, 2025.

MEDILL, Ismael M. Belkoura

WASHINGTON – At a time when the Department of Veterans Affairs has been processing record levels of disability claims, Democrats warned last week that the agency’s productivity will not last under the deep cuts ordered by President Donald Trump.

The 2022 PACT Act broadened eligibility for VA disability claims. Staff increases under the Biden administration enabled the VA to keep up with the growing number of claims.


However, VA Secretary Doug Collins said in March the department plans to deeply slash its employees to return to 2019 staffing levels. Based on the goals of the Trump administration to shrink the federal government, Collins said the VA plans to lay off around 72,000 people over the next year, a 15% decrease in their current staff levels.

“How can claims be processed and care be delivered if VA isn't adequately staffed or equipped?” Rep. Mark Takano, D-CA, said on April 10 at a House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee hearing.

In February, the VA dismissed around 2,400 employees.

After serving their country, and getting injured or sick, veterans often rely on the VA for disability benefits.

The PACT Act allowed for more veterans to file for disability veteran compensation. Over 1.7 million disability claims, linked directly to the PACT Act, were filed in the first two years as part of 4.4 million claims overall in the same time frame.

The processing rate of disability claims has continued to increase. The VA processed 8.5% more disability claims this year—compared to the same time frame in 2024—said Kenneth Smith, an assistant deputy under secretary for operations management at the Department of Veterans Affairs, on April 9 at a House Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs subcommittee hearing.

The department expects to surpass last fiscal year’s recordof 2.5 million processed claims.

"While significant progress has been made, we recognize the need for continuous improvement and adapting to evolve [to the] needs of those we serve," Smith said.

Smith noted the current disability claim backlog, which was around 230,000 as of April 5, was slowly shrinking. He said the department receives 10,000 daily claims but processes around 11,000 daily.

Subcommittee chairman Rep. Morgan Luttrell, R-TX, said inefficient bureaucratic systems could unnecessarily delay or dismantle the application process of a veteran.

“There will always be a problem set that exists,” Luttrell said. “The VA is such a wonderful working machine. I mean, I say that wholeheartedly, it has its problems. We should forever be changing in order to keep up with the wants and needs our veterans face.”

The subcommittee hearing was held a day after Democratic members of both the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees, including Rep. Morgan McGarvey, D-KY, signed a letter denouncing an executive order from President Donald Trump that eliminates certain collective bargaining and labor rights for public servants at the VA and other agencies.

“We need them [VA staff members] to be able to do their best work without unnecessary limits or undermining their importance to the system,” McGarvey said. “Unfortunately, this administration continues to spread the false message that the VA employees are not dedicated to their mission.”

The House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee hearing focused on the Trump administration’s elimination of labor rights for VA workers and veterans who work for the federal government.

Senior Advisor George Chewning at the Union Veterans Council, which represents veterans, said cutting 2,400 from the VA staff had already slowed services but it has been difficult to get a complete picture of the effects.

“It’s hard to imagine a world in which the VA can serve those additional hundreds of thousands of veterans that are now receiving benefits and care while removing the staffing that was brought in to support that,” said Chewning, who was a White House fellow under Trump’s first administration and Biden’s administration.

Ismael M. Belkoura is a graduate journalism student with the Medill News Service at Northwestern University. He specializes in health, business and legal reporting.


Read More

An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult man holds a microphone while asking a question during a town hall meeting.

Congress ignored 90% of public support for background checks. Learn how citizen assemblies and sortition helped Ireland break gridlock and could work in the US.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Consensus Without Power: How Sortition Could Break America's Legislative Gridlock

In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting killed twenty children, the US Senate voted on the Manchin-Toomey Act to expand background checks and to include gun-show and internet sales of firearms. Roughly nine in ten Americans, including a majority of gun owners, supported the bill—a figure that has held steady across more than a decade of polling. It fell short of the 60-vote threshold by six votes. This was not an outlier. On complex issues, representatives often fail to translate public consensus into reality. Research shows that legislators consistently vote in line with donor and interest group preferences over constituent opinion. Before the vote, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned every senator it would “rate” their vote on its annual rating system, and a low NRA rating could cost senators their next primary. Consequently, the bill died 54-46, and the majority of Americans watched, powerless, as their consensus was overridden by self-interested representatives.

Liberal democracies need a method to bypass electoral incentives that run counter to public opinion. One already exists: Ireland faced the same stalemate on complex issues before it instituted a process called sortition. The beauty of sortition lies in its removal of the primary pressure that misaligns representatives’ interests from public interest: reelection. Much like jury duty, citizens are randomly drawn from the population. An independent body then stratifies the pool, so the final group mirrors the country by age, gender, geography, and income. The group meets over weeks or months, hearing from experts and the public, as well as debating frequently. At the end, it issues a recommendation that parliament may then put to a referendum or pass into law.

Keep ReadingShow less