Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

VA Announces Record Efficiency Amid Potential Staffing Cuts

News

VA Announces Record Efficiency Amid Potential Staffing Cuts

The Committee on Veterans’ Affairs hearing room in the Cannon House Office Building on April 9, 2025.

MEDILL, Ismael M. Belkoura

WASHINGTON – At a time when the Department of Veterans Affairs has been processing record levels of disability claims, Democrats warned last week that the agency’s productivity will not last under the deep cuts ordered by President Donald Trump.

The 2022 PACT Act broadened eligibility for VA disability claims. Staff increases under the Biden administration enabled the VA to keep up with the growing number of claims.


However, VA Secretary Doug Collins said in March the department plans to deeply slash its employees to return to 2019 staffing levels. Based on the goals of the Trump administration to shrink the federal government, Collins said the VA plans to lay off around 72,000 people over the next year, a 15% decrease in their current staff levels.

“How can claims be processed and care be delivered if VA isn't adequately staffed or equipped?” Rep. Mark Takano, D-CA, said on April 10 at a House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee hearing.

In February, the VA dismissed around 2,400 employees.

After serving their country, and getting injured or sick, veterans often rely on the VA for disability benefits.

The PACT Act allowed for more veterans to file for disability veteran compensation. Over 1.7 million disability claims, linked directly to the PACT Act, were filed in the first two years as part of 4.4 million claims overall in the same time frame.

The processing rate of disability claims has continued to increase. The VA processed 8.5% more disability claims this year—compared to the same time frame in 2024—said Kenneth Smith, an assistant deputy under secretary for operations management at the Department of Veterans Affairs, on April 9 at a House Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs subcommittee hearing.

The department expects to surpass last fiscal year’s recordof 2.5 million processed claims.

"While significant progress has been made, we recognize the need for continuous improvement and adapting to evolve [to the] needs of those we serve," Smith said.

Smith noted the current disability claim backlog, which was around 230,000 as of April 5, was slowly shrinking. He said the department receives 10,000 daily claims but processes around 11,000 daily.

Subcommittee chairman Rep. Morgan Luttrell, R-TX, said inefficient bureaucratic systems could unnecessarily delay or dismantle the application process of a veteran.

“There will always be a problem set that exists,” Luttrell said. “The VA is such a wonderful working machine. I mean, I say that wholeheartedly, it has its problems. We should forever be changing in order to keep up with the wants and needs our veterans face.”

The subcommittee hearing was held a day after Democratic members of both the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees, including Rep. Morgan McGarvey, D-KY, signed a letter denouncing an executive order from President Donald Trump that eliminates certain collective bargaining and labor rights for public servants at the VA and other agencies.

“We need them [VA staff members] to be able to do their best work without unnecessary limits or undermining their importance to the system,” McGarvey said. “Unfortunately, this administration continues to spread the false message that the VA employees are not dedicated to their mission.”

The House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee hearing focused on the Trump administration’s elimination of labor rights for VA workers and veterans who work for the federal government.

Senior Advisor George Chewning at the Union Veterans Council, which represents veterans, said cutting 2,400 from the VA staff had already slowed services but it has been difficult to get a complete picture of the effects.

“It’s hard to imagine a world in which the VA can serve those additional hundreds of thousands of veterans that are now receiving benefits and care while removing the staffing that was brought in to support that,” said Chewning, who was a White House fellow under Trump’s first administration and Biden’s administration.

Ismael M. Belkoura is a graduate journalism student with the Medill News Service at Northwestern University. He specializes in health, business and legal reporting.


Read More

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional
beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court, in holding that partisan gerrymandering is permissible—unless it "goes too far"—stated that the argument made against this practice based on the Court's "one person, one vote" doctrine didn't work because the cases that developed that doctrine were about ensuring that each vote had an equal weight. The Court reasoned that after redistricting, each vote still has equal weight.

I would respectfully disagree. After admittedly partisan redistricting, each vote does not have an equal weight. The purpose of partisan gerrymandering is typically to create a "safe" seat—to group citizens so that the dominant political party has a clear majority of the voters. It's the transformation of a contested seat or even a seat safe for the other party into a safe seat for the party doing the redistricting.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Puncher’s Illusion: Winning the First Round and Losing the War
Toy soldiers in a battle formation
Photo by Saifee Art on Unsplash

The Puncher’s Illusion: Winning the First Round and Losing the War

In the Rumble in the Jungle, George Foreman came in expecting to end the fight early.

At first, it looked that way. He was stronger, faster, and landing clean punches. I watched the 1974 championship on simulcast fifty-two years ago and remember how dominant he was in the opening rounds.

Keep ReadingShow less
Calling Wealthy Benefactors!
A rusty house figure stands over a city.
Photo by Katja Ano on Unsplash

Calling Wealthy Benefactors!

My housing has been conditional on circumstances beyond my control, and the time is up; the owner is selling.

Securing affordable housing is a stressor for much of the working class. According to recent data, nearly 50% of renters are cost-burdened, meaning they spend over 30% of their take-home income on housing costs. Rental prices in California are especially high, 35% higher than the national average. Renting is routinely insecure. The lords of land need to renovate, their kids need to move in. They need to sell.

Keep ReadingShow less
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed upon entering the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on June 6, 2023 in New York City. New York City has provided sanctuary to over 46,000 asylum seekers since 2013, when the city passed a law prohibiting city agencies from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement agencies unless there is a warrant for the person's arrest.(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed.
(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

The Power of the Purse and Executive Discretion: ICE Expansion Under the Trump Administration

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Core Constitutional Debate: Expanded ICE enforcement under the Trump Administration raises a core constitutional question: Does Article II executive power override Article I’s congressional power of the purse?
  • Executive Justification: The primary constitutional justification for expanded ICE enforcement is The Unitary Executive Theory.
  • Separation of Powers: Critics argue that the Unitary Executive Theory undermines Congress’s power of the purse.
  • Moral Conflict: Expanded ICE enforcement has sparked a moral debate, as concerns over due process and civil liberties clash with claims of increased public safety and national security.

Where is ICE Funding Coming From?

Since the beginning of the current Trump Administration, immigration enforcement has undergone transformative change and become one of the most contested issues in the federal government. On his first day in office, President Trump issued Executive Order 14159, which directs executive agencies to implement stricter immigration enforcement practices. In order to implement these practices, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a budget reconciliation package that paired state and local tax cuts with immigration funding. This allocated $170.7 billion in immigration-related funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to spend by 2029.

Keep ReadingShow less