Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

VA Announces Record Efficiency Amid Potential Staffing Cuts

News

VA Announces Record Efficiency Amid Potential Staffing Cuts

The Committee on Veterans’ Affairs hearing room in the Cannon House Office Building on April 9, 2025.

MEDILL, Ismael M. Belkoura

WASHINGTON – At a time when the Department of Veterans Affairs has been processing record levels of disability claims, Democrats warned last week that the agency’s productivity will not last under the deep cuts ordered by President Donald Trump.

The 2022 PACT Act broadened eligibility for VA disability claims. Staff increases under the Biden administration enabled the VA to keep up with the growing number of claims.


However, VA Secretary Doug Collins said in March the department plans to deeply slash its employees to return to 2019 staffing levels. Based on the goals of the Trump administration to shrink the federal government, Collins said the VA plans to lay off around 72,000 people over the next year, a 15% decrease in their current staff levels.

“How can claims be processed and care be delivered if VA isn't adequately staffed or equipped?” Rep. Mark Takano, D-CA, said on April 10 at a House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee hearing.

In February, the VA dismissed around 2,400 employees.

After serving their country, and getting injured or sick, veterans often rely on the VA for disability benefits.

The PACT Act allowed for more veterans to file for disability veteran compensation. Over 1.7 million disability claims, linked directly to the PACT Act, were filed in the first two years as part of 4.4 million claims overall in the same time frame.

The processing rate of disability claims has continued to increase. The VA processed 8.5% more disability claims this year—compared to the same time frame in 2024—said Kenneth Smith, an assistant deputy under secretary for operations management at the Department of Veterans Affairs, on April 9 at a House Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs subcommittee hearing.

The department expects to surpass last fiscal year’s recordof 2.5 million processed claims.

"While significant progress has been made, we recognize the need for continuous improvement and adapting to evolve [to the] needs of those we serve," Smith said.

Smith noted the current disability claim backlog, which was around 230,000 as of April 5, was slowly shrinking. He said the department receives 10,000 daily claims but processes around 11,000 daily.

Subcommittee chairman Rep. Morgan Luttrell, R-TX, said inefficient bureaucratic systems could unnecessarily delay or dismantle the application process of a veteran.

“There will always be a problem set that exists,” Luttrell said. “The VA is such a wonderful working machine. I mean, I say that wholeheartedly, it has its problems. We should forever be changing in order to keep up with the wants and needs our veterans face.”

The subcommittee hearing was held a day after Democratic members of both the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees, including Rep. Morgan McGarvey, D-KY, signed a letter denouncing an executive order from President Donald Trump that eliminates certain collective bargaining and labor rights for public servants at the VA and other agencies.

“We need them [VA staff members] to be able to do their best work without unnecessary limits or undermining their importance to the system,” McGarvey said. “Unfortunately, this administration continues to spread the false message that the VA employees are not dedicated to their mission.”

The House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee hearing focused on the Trump administration’s elimination of labor rights for VA workers and veterans who work for the federal government.

Senior Advisor George Chewning at the Union Veterans Council, which represents veterans, said cutting 2,400 from the VA staff had already slowed services but it has been difficult to get a complete picture of the effects.

“It’s hard to imagine a world in which the VA can serve those additional hundreds of thousands of veterans that are now receiving benefits and care while removing the staffing that was brought in to support that,” said Chewning, who was a White House fellow under Trump’s first administration and Biden’s administration.

Ismael M. Belkoura is a graduate journalism student with the Medill News Service at Northwestern University. He specializes in health, business and legal reporting.

Read More

Congress Bill Spotlight: Remove the Stain Act

A deep look at the fight over rescinding Medals of Honor from U.S. soldiers at Wounded Knee, the political clash surrounding the Remove the Stain Act, and what’s at stake for historical justice.

Getty Images, Stocktrek Images

Congress Bill Spotlight: Remove the Stain Act

Should the U.S. soldiers at 1890’s Wounded Knee keep the Medal of Honor?

Context: history

Keep ReadingShow less
The Recipe for a Humanitarian Crisis: 600,000 Venezuelans Set to Be Returned to the “Mouth of the Shark”

Migrant families from Honduras, Guatemala, Venezuela and Haiti live in a migrant camp set up by a charity organization in a former hospital, in the border town of Matamoros, Mexico.

(Photo by Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images)

The Recipe for a Humanitarian Crisis: 600,000 Venezuelans Set to Be Returned to the “Mouth of the Shark”

On October 3, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to end Temporary Protected Status for roughly 600,000 Venezuelans living in the United States, effective November 7, 2025. Although the exact mechanisms and details are unclear at this time, the message from DHS is: “Venezuelans, leave.”

Proponents of the Administration’s position (there is no official Opinion from SCOTUS, as the ruling was part of its shadow docket) argue that (1) the Secretary of DHS has discretion to determine designate whether a country is safe enough for individuals to return from the US, (2) “Temporary Protected Status” was always meant to be temporary, and (3) the situation in Venezuela has improved enough that Venezuelans in the U.S. may now safely return to Venezuela. As a lawyer who volunteers with immigrants, I admit that the two legal bases—Secretary’s broad discretion and the temporary nature of TPS—carry some weight, and I will not address them here.

Keep ReadingShow less
For the Sake of Our Humanity: Humane Theology and America’s Crisis of Civility

Praying outdoors

ImagineGolf/Getty Images

For the Sake of Our Humanity: Humane Theology and America’s Crisis of Civility

The American experiment has been sustained not by flawless execution of its founding ideals but by the moral imagination of people who refused to surrender hope. From abolitionists to suffragists to the foot soldiers of the civil-rights movement, generations have insisted that the Republic live up to its creed. Yet today that hope feels imperiled. Coarsened public discourse, the normalization of cruelty in policy, and the corrosion of democratic trust signal more than political dysfunction—they expose a crisis of meaning.

Naming that crisis is not enough. What we need, I argue, is a recovered ethic of humaneness—a civic imagination rooted in empathy, dignity, and shared responsibility. Eric Liu, through Citizens University and his "Civic Saturday" fellows and gatherings, proposes that democracy requires a "civic religion," a shared set of stories and rituals that remind us who we are and what we owe one another. I find deep resonance between that vision and what I call humane theology. That is, a belief and moral framework that insists public life cannot flourish when empathy is starved.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Myth of Colorblind Fairness

U.S. Supreme Court

Photo by mana5280 on Unsplash

The Myth of Colorblind Fairness

Two years after the Supreme Court banned race-conscious college admissions in Students for Fair Admissions, universities are scrambling to maintain diversity through “race-neutral” alternatives they believe will be inherently fair. New economic research reveals that colorblind policies may systematically create inequality in ways more pervasive than even the notorious “old boy” network.

The “old boy” network, as its name suggests, is nothing new—evoking smoky cigar lounges or golf courses where business ties are formed, careers are launched, and those not invited are left behind. Opportunity reproduces itself, passed down like an inheritance if you belong to the “right” group. The old boy network is not the only example of how a social network can discriminate. In fact, my research shows it may not even be the best one. And how social networks discriminate completely changes the debate about diversity.

Keep ReadingShow less