Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump's Scapegoating Power Grab

Opinion

Trump's Scapegoating Power Grab

Donald Trump

Mark Lyons/Getty Images

Scapegoating is an old ruse of authoritarian leaders to get their followers to support action against the minority scapegoated, or even commit crimes themselves against the scapegoated.

The Nazi's used the burning of the Reichstag (the German equivalent of the Capitol), which they blamed on a Communist, to convince the German President to issue an emergency decree that abolished freedom of speech, assembly, privacy, and the press; legalized phone tapping and interception of correspondence. Thousands of Communists were arrested, and Adolf Hitler—then the German Chancellor (Prime Minister)—used the decree to consolidate his power and crush his enemies.


Fast forward to the aftermath of the Charlie Kirk assassination. Although the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, is alleged to have acted alone and is not alleged to have been a member of any political party or group, and with no information about his politics or motive, other than some social media memes that included an anti-fascist statement and his being against hatred, President Trump, Vice President Vance and other members of the administration and MAGA universe have portrayed the crime as being the product of the "radical political left."

And they seek to use this opportunity to crush the left. I quote Vance, "We are going to go after the NGO network that foments and facilitates and engages in violence."

Trump's modus operandi is to demonize his opponents, thus gaining the support of his base against them, and then attacking them in any way possible. He has declared emergencies to give him the power to act under existing law to carry out his designs. Whether it was, for example, deporting Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador, imposing tariffs, or deploying troops to the border, Trump has relied on statutory authority that was meant to be used only in extraordinary emergencies such as war or an invasion. An AP analysis showed that 30 of 150 Trump executive orders cited emergency power or authority.

Another aspect of his modus operandi is that he claims the problem of violence is coming from the left. Still, studies have shown that the far-right has been guilty of more acts of violence, including acts against Jews—for example, the Tree of Life Synagogue shootings—and Democrats—the assassination of Rep. Hortman, than have those on the left. One of these studies, conducted by a libertarian organization, was even featured on the DOJ website, but it has since been deleted.

Regarding acts of violence by the far-right, the perpetrators have, in general, been portrayed by Trump as individuals having a good excuse. But when violence comes from the left, it is always a function of and reflection on the movement, not the act of an individual.

This would be laughable were it not for the power that Trump has amassed and the absolute fealty and subservience that he is shown. Congress has become a tool of Trump's, and the loyalty of his base is unwavering. He could quite possibly do what he is seeking to do.

This is yet one more example of the Hitler-Trump analogy that I have written about previously in my blog. It's like his playbook—total control of all elements of government—was taken from Hitler. No one stopped Hitler. The question is, who will stop Trump? I honestly don't know. The levers of power are all in the hands of Republicans, and the judicial system, to date, with an acquiescent Supreme Court, has not been a brake on Trump's actions.

Trump represents a bare majority of American voters. Yet, he has managed to place himself above all the checks and balances that have enabled our democracy to survive these 250 years. And it is, unfortunately, the "consent of the governed"—at least those that elected him—that has enabled him to wreak havoc on our democracy and assume what I would call quasi-dictatorial power.

I have faith in our system and in the American people, and so I feel that somehow, at some point, this scourge that has overtaken our country will be removed, and we will return to the reasoned, if somewhat flawed, democracy that we have enjoyed for 250 years.

Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com


Read More

Illustration of US Capitol

Illustration of US Capitol

Illustration provided

Are States and Localities Required to Cooperate with ICE?

Polls show a majority of Americans disapprove of how Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is doing its job, with outrage stoked by a surge in immigration arrests across the country and multiple killings by federal immigration officials. In many places, residents are against their state and local officials cooperating with immigration authorities. And many local law enforcement leaders argue that cooperating with federal immigration enforcement operations undermines public safety by taking resources away from local priorities and eroding communities’ trust in law enforcement.

Trump administration officials have repeatedly argued that states and localities are legally obligated to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement efforts. They have also warned that state and local laws limiting cooperation with ICE will be met with harsh crackdowns.

Keep ReadingShow less
people in a boardroom


Happy female entrepreneur with colleagues sitting at a desk in an office

Getty images

Understanding The Dissolution of Federal DEI Offices and Initiatives: Debate and Implications

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Background

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is a buzzword often used in political spaces, and its implementations, or lack thereof, have repercussions on many groups. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion efforts are organizational policies and initiatives that aim to equitably distribute opportunities and to create accepting workplaces for marginalized populations. These policies create hiring and recruitment guidelines to hire, retain, and promote individuals from those backgrounds. Supporters of these policies argue they are necessary in driving meaningful social progress, while critics argue they subordinate the role of merit in awarding opportunities.

Keep ReadingShow less
People waving US flags

Modern politics rewards viral outrage over thoughtful debate. Explore how introducing mindfulness, gratitude, and cross-party reflection can lower the temperature in Washington and rebuild governance.

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

Zen and Governing in a Time of Politics as Performance Art

News reports and social media constantly remind us that today’s political system rewards conflict, viral moments, and ideological performance over thoughtful and courteous debate.

Tune into the melee, and it is as if every high-ranking official is now a TV political pundit rather than a serious statesman or stateswoman.

Keep ReadingShow less
houses being built

Existing laws in Colorado reduce the administrative and regulatory costs of building new housing.

Congress Just Passed a Housing Law That Rewards States for Reform — Here’s Why Colorado Has a Head Start

In Colorado, a full-time worker must earn US$36.44 an hour to afford a modest two-bedroom apartment without spending more than 30% of their income on rent, according to a recent report from the National Low Income Housing Coalition.

The state’s minimum wage is $15.16. Someone earning that would have to work 96 hours a week, more than two full-time jobs, to cover rent.

Keep ReadingShow less