Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump's Scapegoating Power Grab

Opinion

Trump's Scapegoating Power Grab

Donald Trump

Mark Lyons/Getty Images

Scapegoating is an old ruse of authoritarian leaders to get their followers to support action against the minority scapegoated, or even commit crimes themselves against the scapegoated.

The Nazi's used the burning of the Reichstag (the German equivalent of the Capitol), which they blamed on a Communist, to convince the German President to issue an emergency decree that abolished freedom of speech, assembly, privacy, and the press; legalized phone tapping and interception of correspondence. Thousands of Communists were arrested, and Adolf Hitler—then the German Chancellor (Prime Minister)—used the decree to consolidate his power and crush his enemies.


Fast forward to the aftermath of the Charlie Kirk assassination. Although the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, is alleged to have acted alone and is not alleged to have been a member of any political party or group, and with no information about his politics or motive, other than some social media memes that included an anti-fascist statement and his being against hatred, President Trump, Vice President Vance and other members of the administration and MAGA universe have portrayed the crime as being the product of the "radical political left."

And they seek to use this opportunity to crush the left. I quote Vance, "We are going to go after the NGO network that foments and facilitates and engages in violence."

Trump's modus operandi is to demonize his opponents, thus gaining the support of his base against them, and then attacking them in any way possible. He has declared emergencies to give him the power to act under existing law to carry out his designs. Whether it was, for example, deporting Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador, imposing tariffs, or deploying troops to the border, Trump has relied on statutory authority that was meant to be used only in extraordinary emergencies such as war or an invasion. An AP analysis showed that 30 of 150 Trump executive orders cited emergency power or authority.

Another aspect of his modus operandi is that he claims the problem of violence is coming from the left. Still, studies have shown that the far-right has been guilty of more acts of violence, including acts against Jews—for example, the Tree of Life Synagogue shootings—and Democrats—the assassination of Rep. Hortman, than have those on the left. One of these studies, conducted by a libertarian organization, was even featured on the DOJ website, but it has since been deleted.

Regarding acts of violence by the far-right, the perpetrators have, in general, been portrayed by Trump as individuals having a good excuse. But when violence comes from the left, it is always a function of and reflection on the movement, not the act of an individual.

This would be laughable were it not for the power that Trump has amassed and the absolute fealty and subservience that he is shown. Congress has become a tool of Trump's, and the loyalty of his base is unwavering. He could quite possibly do what he is seeking to do.

This is yet one more example of the Hitler-Trump analogy that I have written about previously in my blog. It's like his playbook—total control of all elements of government—was taken from Hitler. No one stopped Hitler. The question is, who will stop Trump? I honestly don't know. The levers of power are all in the hands of Republicans, and the judicial system, to date, with an acquiescent Supreme Court, has not been a brake on Trump's actions.

Trump represents a bare majority of American voters. Yet, he has managed to place himself above all the checks and balances that have enabled our democracy to survive these 250 years. And it is, unfortunately, the "consent of the governed"—at least those that elected him—that has enabled him to wreak havoc on our democracy and assume what I would call quasi-dictatorial power.

I have faith in our system and in the American people, and so I feel that somehow, at some point, this scourge that has overtaken our country will be removed, and we will return to the reasoned, if somewhat flawed, democracy that we have enjoyed for 250 years.

Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com


Read More

Gerrymandering: The Maps Shaping Power Ahead of the 2026 Midterms
After Virginia Special Election, The Gerrymandering War Escalates Again

Gerrymandering: The Maps Shaping Power Ahead of the 2026 Midterms

Gerrymandering, the strategic manipulation of voting district boundaries to benefit certain political parties or candidates, has once again taken center stage as this year’s primary elections approach. Though redistricting is typically marked by the decennial census, mid-decade redistricting has become more common across the U.S. since the early 2000s.

The aim of redistricting is to ensure that representative assemblies within a state continue to accurately represent their constituents as population demographics shift over time; however, since the early 1800s, this system has been exploited by U.S. political parties seeking to manipulate voting outcomes in their favor. The same can be said about the current election cycle.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top of the U.S. Supreme Court House

Congress advances a reconciliation bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security while passing key rural legislation. As debates over ICE funding, wildfire policy, and broadband expansion unfold, lawmakers also face new questions about the use of AI in government.

Getty Images, Bloomberg Creative

Starting Up the Reconciliation Machine

This week the Senate began the long, procedure-heavy process of creating and passing a reconciliation bill in order to enact Republican priorities without requiring any votes from Democratic legislators: funding the parts of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) whose funding remains lapsed and additional funds for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Also this week, the House agreed to two bills that next go to the President and voted on a number of bills related to rural areas.

Two New Laws Soon

Both of these bills go to the President next for signing:

Keep ReadingShow less
ICE Director Requests Additional $5.4 Billion at Congressional Budget Hearing

CBP Chief Rodney Scott (left), Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons (middle) and USCIS Director Joseph Edlow (right) testify at budget hearing.

Jamie Gareh/Medill News Service)

ICE Director Requests Additional $5.4 Billion at Congressional Budget Hearing

WASHINGTON- The acting director of ICE on Thursday told Congress that while the Trump administration pumped $75 billion extra into ICE over four years, many activities remain cash starved and the agency needs about $5.4 billion in additional funding for 2027.

There’s misinformation with the Big Beautiful Bill that ICE is fully funded,” said Todd Lyons, acting director of ICE, whose resignation was announced later that day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Illinois House Passes Bill to Restrict Construction of Immigration Detention Centers in Communities

The Illinois State Capitol Building, in Springfield, Illinois on MAY 05, 2012.

(Photo By Raymond Boyd/Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images)

Illinois House Passes Bill to Restrict Construction of Immigration Detention Centers in Communities

The Illinois House passed a legislative proposal in a 72-35 partisan vote that would restrict where immigration detention centers can be built, located or operated in the state.

House Bill 5024 would amend state code so that an immigration detention center cannot be located, constructed, or operated by the federal government within 1,500 feet of a home or apartment complex, as well as any school, day care center, public park, or house of worship. Current detention facilities in the state would not be affected by the legislation.

Keep ReadingShow less