Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Surviving the Cold: How Private Hypothermia Shelters Are Stepping In for the Community in Washington, D.C.

News

Surviving the Cold: How Private Hypothermia Shelters Are Stepping In for the Community in Washington, D.C.
Shifting the narrative on homelessness in America
Getty Images

Walking up and down the metro escalators was the only way David Jackson could stay warm during the winter nights of 2021.

While Jackson knew he could call District officials to come pick him up in a van and drive him to a hypothermia shelter, he kept hearing negative experiences from others. According to the 2024 annual Point in Time study, which reports homelessness in the Washington metropolitan area, there are 3,960 people experiencing homelessness. However, findings show 1,778 beds available for homeless people looking for hypothermia shelters, which only offer overnight emergency housing without additional support.


“My motivation to keep warm was stronger than how tired I felt,” Jackson said.

Between Nov. 1 and March 31, or hypothermia season, the District opens 17 hypothermia shelters to the homeless. District officials open these shelters to the public during hypothermia alerts, when the temperature is lower than 32 degrees Fahrenheit, and cold weather emergencies, when the temperature is lower than 15 degrees Fahrenheit.

The District government did not respond to comments for this story.

District officials run this program to prevent homeless people from contracting hypothermia. Hypothermia is a condition in which the body’s core temperature decreases to below 95 degrees Fahrenheit. Although it can occur year-round, it is most often contracted in the winter due to exposure to cold weather conditions.

While homeless, Jackson lived in a tent with his brother outside the CVS in Dupont Circle. One time in the summer, despite warm weather, Jackson said he contracted hypothermia. After a rainy night, he woke up two hours before sunrise, soaking wet and freezing, even though the outside temperature was 70 degrees Fahrenheit.

“My whole body was cramped,” Jackson said. “I could barely walk.”

Jackson made it to Miriam’s Kitchen to warm up, a food distribution center for the homeless in Foggy Bottom, about a 20-minute walk from his tent.

During another winter, Jackson’s hands turned white and then blue due to the cold. He was able to warm them up again under hot water.

Besides walking up and down escalators like Jackson, other people who are homeless turn to alcohol or drugs. Jackson said he never did drugs while homeless, but he did drink, which gave him the illusion of being warm.

According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, an estimated 38 percent of people who are homeless abuse alcohol, with an additional 26 percent abusing drugs.

Even though Jackson did not seek hypothermia shelters, he got himself out of homelessness after his brother, who is permanently disabled, qualified for housing through disability benefits. Jackson moved into an apartment with his brother but now lives independently while working as an ironworker.

Kate Coventry is the Deputy Director of Legislative Strategy at the DC Fiscal Policy Institute (DCFPI), where homelessness is a policy focus. Coventry said the shelters the District provides during hypothermia season are “low barrier,” or shelters that minimize the requirements for entry, meaning homeless people.

“The people needing shelter just grows and grows and grows and you can’t keep up with it,” Coventry said, referencing low barrier shelters.

Coventry said low-barrier shelters in the District include those run by Catholic Charities and N Street Village. Catholic Charities and N Street Village did not respond to comment for this story.

But Coventry added that these low-barrier shelters are often not designed to be shelters; rather, they are large areas with beds. In low-barrier shelters, she said, people who are homeless come in with a variety of goals, from finding housing to securing their GED and everything else in between. Rather, she said these shelters should be designed with services, like access to case managers.

Coventry said there are shelters providing these services, but they tend to be “high barrier,” or to take advantage of the services, one needs to follow a set of rules. One of the organizations Coventry mentioned has a “high barrier”: The Father McKenna Center.

Although the Center has other programs, such as clothing distribution, a computer lab, and a food pantry, its main project is the hypothermia program headed by Executive Director Dennis Dee. The program serves as an alternative to those provided by the District government.

“While DC has a Hypothermia Hotline, many of our guests do not feel safe in emergency shelter environments, and there is no support for their transition through homelessness, only maintenance of their status quo,” the Center’s website states.

Dee has been the executive director of the Center since the beginning of 2024, but his history with the Center goes back to August 2017.

Due to his alcoholism, Dee lost his career as an investment banker, split with his wife, and lost contact with his friends and family. After using the resources provided by the Center from August to October 2017, Dee was invited at the beginning of the 2017-2018 hypothermia season to take part in the programming.

Dee only used the hypothermia program for six weeks because he found a sober home group.

For the past 20 years, Dee said the program has offered 10 men consistent overnight housing during the District’s hypothermia season from Nov. 1 to March 31. According to the Center’s website, they have this programming as an alternative to what the District government offers.

Compared to other hypothermia programs in the District, Dee said the “distinguishing characteristic” is that the Center offers 150 consistent nights compared to other programs, which are only open in the evenings and do not guarantee an individual a bed.

He also said the hypothermia shelters, which tend to be run by Catholic Charities, are run “very lean. " He estimates the District government only gives public hypothermia shelters two dollars to serve each homeless person per night. Dee said Catholic Charities does rely on funding from its donors for its hypothermia programs as well.

“The D.C. government grinds them down,” Dee said about Catholic Charities.

Dee said the Center provides more than government-funded hypothermia shelters. During the programming, besides being given nightly housing, participants are offered a nightly shower, storage for their personal belongings, and nightly meals by volunteers.

These volunteers cook a meal for the program participants and then eat with them. Dee said the program relies on volunteers for 150 nights straight to serve the participants.

“The differentiating factor here, more than anything, is the significant volunteer presence here,” Dee said.

According to the Center’s website, 75 percent of the participants in the program meet their goals, including sobriety, housing, employment, and family reunification, among others. Dee said that if a spot opens up because one of the men meets their goals, it is given to another participant.

“We have a graduation and maybe a celebratory meal,” Dee said if one of the men finds housing.

He also said some participants stop coming somewhere through the program, which is because these men most likely have a combination of addiction and mental health issues.

In total, Dee estimates there are over 1,000 unique volunteers every year since the Center has a close relationship with the students and families of Gonzaga and serves around 600 people. Between the “encouragement and support” the men are getting from these volunteers, Dee said he knows the hypothermia program at the Center is an exception to other hypothermia shelters in the District.

“I smile when I talk about it,” Dee said in reference to the Center’s hypothermia programming. “Because it’s definitely neat.”

Maggie Rhoads is a student journalist attending George Washington University School of Media and Public Affairs. At The Fulcrum, she covers how legislation and policy are impacting communities.


Read More

An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult man holds a microphone while asking a question during a town hall meeting.

Congress ignored 90% of public support for background checks. Learn how citizen assemblies and sortition helped Ireland break gridlock and could work in the US.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Consensus Without Power: How Sortition Could Break America's Legislative Gridlock

In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting killed twenty children, the US Senate voted on the Manchin-Toomey Act to expand background checks and to include gun-show and internet sales of firearms. Roughly nine in ten Americans, including a majority of gun owners, supported the bill—a figure that has held steady across more than a decade of polling. It fell short of the 60-vote threshold by six votes. This was not an outlier. On complex issues, representatives often fail to translate public consensus into reality. Research shows that legislators consistently vote in line with donor and interest group preferences over constituent opinion. Before the vote, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned every senator it would “rate” their vote on its annual rating system, and a low NRA rating could cost senators their next primary. Consequently, the bill died 54-46, and the majority of Americans watched, powerless, as their consensus was overridden by self-interested representatives.

Liberal democracies need a method to bypass electoral incentives that run counter to public opinion. One already exists: Ireland faced the same stalemate on complex issues before it instituted a process called sortition. The beauty of sortition lies in its removal of the primary pressure that misaligns representatives’ interests from public interest: reelection. Much like jury duty, citizens are randomly drawn from the population. An independent body then stratifies the pool, so the final group mirrors the country by age, gender, geography, and income. The group meets over weeks or months, hearing from experts and the public, as well as debating frequently. At the end, it issues a recommendation that parliament may then put to a referendum or pass into law.

Keep ReadingShow less