Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Laredo at the Crossroads of Border Policy

News

Laredo at the Crossroads of Border Policy

Laredo police car

Credit: Ashley Soriano

LAREDO, Texas — The United States Border Patrol has deployed military Stryker combat tanks along the Rio Grande River in Laredo, Texas. The Laredo Police Department reports that human stash houses — once a common sight during the Biden administration — have largely disappeared. And the Webb County medical examiner reports fewer migrant deaths.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection data show illegal crossings have dropped to a five-year low under President Donald Trump’s mass deportation policies. What’s happening on the ground at the border supports the numbers, and the decline is palpable at Dr. Corinne Stern’s office, as migrant deaths are also falling.


Death at the Border: Crossing Illegally

At the end of a secluded, winding road in Laredo, Texas, sits the Webb County Medical Examiner’s Office. For nearly two decades, Stern has investigated the deaths of immigrants attempting to cross into the United States illegally.

On a hot summer day, less than 24 hours after a woman attempted to cross the U.S.-Mexico border, her body arrived at Stern’s office – the first dead border crosser in weeks.

The Webb County Medical Examiner’s Office has reported a nearly 97% decrease in migrant deaths since 2021, a trend she attributes to Trump's federal anti-immigration policies. Nineteen border crossers have lain on Stern’s autopsy table so far this year.

“Today, we might get a call, it's been maybe once every three weeks,” Stern said. “This year, the numbers just plummeted.”

That’s compared to 77 deaths in her jurisdiction last year – a stark contrast from 2021 at the height of the migrant surge when she recorded nearly 300 deaths.

“We would get multiple calls a week and sometimes multiple calls a day,” Stern recalled.

Webb County is the sixth-largest county in Texas by land, and covering it is no small task. From Stern’s office, it can take more than two hours to reach the furthest point. Her coverage area also spans 10 other counties across hundreds of miles.

June through September are typically the busiest months, as many crossers die from heatstroke on their journey by foot in triple-digit temperatures and desert-like terrain. The woman who lay on Stern’s autopsy table on Aug. 13 was “markedly dehydrated” and died of hyperthermia.

Stern’s job is unique in that a large number of her patients are unauthorized immigrants, many dying from heat stroke or drowning while attempting to cross the Rio Grande River.

“Because I work down here on the border, a great percentage of my patients are those individuals that die in their attempts to cross the border between Mexico and the United States,” she said.

Although many die from hyperthermia, and others drown while attempting to swim across the Rio Grande River, Stern still conducts an autopsy to determine the cause of death correctly. For women, she checks the reproductive organs to see if she was pregnant. If a dead border crosser was carrying a child at the time of her death, authorities could charge the “coyote” (a person who helps smuggle migrants in exchange for payment) with two counts of murder instead of one.

The woman in Stern’s autopsy room was not pregnant.

Life at the Border: Living Among Law Enforcement

The data show a significant drop in illegal immigration, but numbers don’t tell the complete story about Laredo.

With a 95% Hispanic population, the “Gateway City” is 150 miles from the nearest big city, San Antonio.

Known to outsiders as the United States’ largest inland port of entry, with tens of thousands of semi-trucks passing through with cargo daily, Laredo is largely known to its residents as “safe” and “community-oriented.”

Despite the grim realities of migrant deaths, Laredo was named one of the safest U.S. cities last year by WalletHub. Immigration remains a part of daily life here.

“I love life on the border. Laredo is my home,” Stern said. “It’s one of the safest cities in the country, and I think part of the reason is we have so many boots on the ground.”

At any given moment, Border Patrol cars patrol the city roads and station themselves along the river where city parks are also located. Although Laredo residents are all too familiar with seeing Border Patrol vehicles, some say they’ve noticed an increased presence.

The agents are also locals, frequenting business owner Janet Zapata’s pizza shop, 550 Pizzeria, and other spots like coffee shop Borderland Espresso & Gifts.

Zapata said she’s noticed more agents in recent months, though their presence has been a part of daily life for many people’s entire lives in Laredo — a community where immigration is never far from conversation.

“We think about a lot of the changes that are happening, that are going to happen,” Zapata said.

One of the more noticeable changes is the installation of a military Stryker parked underneath the pedestrian bridge that connects Laredo to its sister city, Nuevo Laredo, Mexico. The armored vehicle sits steps from the Rio Grande River and a city park.

Laredo Border Patrol Chief Jesse Muñoz said there is no militarization of the border, but instead, the vehicle is there in a “supportive role.”

“When I think of military militarization, you think they're coming to do military operations or military things on the border, and that's not the case,” Muñoz said. “They're here to help with border security.”

Public Information Officer Joe Baeza with the Laredo Police Department said this level of enforcement is more than what they’ve seen before.

However, Border Patrol emphasized that this is not a militarization of the border.

“I think we sent a message, and you know one thing is, I don't think the Border Patrol is anti-immigrants or anti-migration. We're anti-illegal immigration,” sector Chief Muñoz said.

Ashley N. Soriano is a bilingual multimedia journalist covering politics and immigration.

Read More

SNAP Isn’t a Negotiating Tool. It’s a Lifeline.
apples and bananas in brown cardboard box
Photo by Maria Lin Kim on Unsplash

SNAP Isn’t a Negotiating Tool. It’s a Lifeline.

Millions of families just survived the longest shutdown in U.S. history. Now they’re bracing again as politicians turn food assistance into a bargaining chip.

Food assistance should not be subject to politics, yet the Trump administration is now requiring over 20 Democratic-led states to share sensitive SNAP recipient data—including Social Security and immigration details—or risk losing funding. Officials call it "program integrity," but the effect is clear: millions of low-income families may once again have their access to food threatened by political disputes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats’ Redistricting Gains Face New Court Battles Ahead of 2026 Elections
us a flag on white concrete building

Democrats’ Redistricting Gains Face New Court Battles Ahead of 2026 Elections

Earlier this year, I reported on Democrats’ redistricting wins in 2025, highlighting gains in states like California and North Carolina. As of December 18, the landscape has shifted again, with new maps finalized, ongoing court battles, and looming implications for the 2026 midterms.

Here are some key developments since mid‑2025:

  • California: Voters approved Proposition 50 in November, allowing legislature‑drawn maps that eliminated three safe Republican seats and made two more competitive. Democrats in vulnerable districts were redrawn into friendlier territory.
  • Virginia: On December 15, Democrats in the House of Delegates pushed a constitutional amendment on redistricting during a special session. Republicans denounced the move as unconstitutional, setting up a legal and political fight ahead of the 2026 elections.
  • Other states in play:
    • Ohio, Texas, Utah, Missouri, North Carolina: New maps are already in effect, reshaping battlegrounds.
    • Florida and Maryland: Legislatures have begun steps toward redistricting, though maps are not yet finalized.
    • New York: Court challenges may force changes to existing maps before 2026.
    • National picture: According to VoteHub’s tracker, the current district breakdown stands at 189 Democratic‑leaning, 205 Republican‑leaning, and 41 highly competitive seats.

Implications for 2026

  • Democrats’ wins in California and North Carolina strengthen their position, but legal challenges in Virginia and New York could blunt momentum.
  • Republicans remain favored in Texas and Ohio, where maps were redrawn to secure GOP advantages.
  • The unusually high number of mid‑decade redistricting efforts — not seen at this scale since the 1800s — underscores how both parties are aggressively shaping the battlefield for 2026.
So, here's the BIG PICTURE: The December snapshot shows Democrats still benefiting from redistricting in key states, but the fight is far from settled. With courts weighing in and legislatures maneuvering, the balance of power heading into the 2026 House elections remains fluid. What began as clear Democratic wins earlier in 2025 has evolved into a multi‑front contest over maps, legality, and political control.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network

Kelly Sponsors Bipartisan Bill Addressing Social Media

Sen. Mark Kelly poses for a selfie before a Harris-Walz rally featuring former President Barack Obama on Oct. 18, 2024.

Photo by Michael McKisson.

Kelly Sponsors Bipartisan Bill Addressing Social Media

WASHINGTON – Lawmakers have struggled for years to regulate social media platforms in ways that tamp down misinformation and extremism.

Much of the criticism has been aimed at algorithms that feed users more and more of whatever they click on – the “rabbit hole” effect blamed for fueling conspiracy theories, depression, eating disorders, suicide and violence.

Keep ReadingShow less
The “Big Beautiful Bill” Becomes Law: From Promise to Fallout
a doctor showing a patient something on the tablet
Photo by Nappy on Unsplash

The “Big Beautiful Bill” Becomes Law: From Promise to Fallout

When I first wrote about the “One Big Beautiful Bill” in May, it was still a proposal advancing through Congress. At the time, the numbers were staggering: $880 billion in Medicaid cuts, millions projected to lose coverage, and a $6 trillion deficit increase. Seven months later, the bill is no longer hypothetical. It passed both chambers of Congress in July and was signed into law on Independence Day.

Now, the debate has shifted from projections to likely impact and the fallout is becoming more and more visible.

Keep ReadingShow less