Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Chinese Investments in Cuba Demonstrate a Waning U.S. Influence in the Region

News

Chinese Investments in Cuba Demonstrate a Waning U.S. Influence in the Region

Ranking member Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) at the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security’s hearing on “Beijing’s Air, Space, and Maritime Surveillance from Cuba: A Growing Threat to the Homeland.”

WASHINGTON – As the Trump administration cuts funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development and foreign aid in Latin America, China increased its diplomatic influence in the Western Hemisphere, particularly in Cuba, just 90 miles from U.S. shores.

“By suspending foreign aid and dismantling USAID, the Trump administration has weakened our national security, allowing China to apply influence within Latin America without competition,” Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) said on May 6 at a House Homeland Security Committee hearing.


China is making heavy investments in airports, seaports, and other critical infrastructure in Latin America—especially Cuba, Nicaragua, Panama, Venezuela, and Brazil. This could give China a strategic advantage in the region, which could supersede America’s influence and empower authoritarian regimes. This was reminiscent of the role the Soviet Union played for many decades, providing fossil fuels and other support to Cuba and the rest of Latin America, provoking great consternation in Washington.

“For decades, we’ve been ignoring our neighborhood and own hemisphere, so it's lost influence, absolutely, over the past 20 years,” said the Chairman of the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security, Rep. Carlos Giménez (R-FL).

On May 13, Beijing will host the 4th Ministerial Meeting of the China-CELAC (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) Forum, where Chinese and Latin American government officials will discuss further collaboration between the two regions. This contrasts with the lack of cooperation from the United States in Latin America, exemplified by mass deportations, hurtful tariffs, and suspension of foreign aid.

In 2024, USAID provided $2.3 million to fund independent Cuban media in order to curb misinformation on the island, according to Reuters. Other U.S.-funded programs in Cuba included support for human rights organizations.

“China has a long-term strategy for this hemisphere built on patient investment, diplomatic cultivation, and evolving security ties,” said Leland Lazarus, associate director of National Security at Florida International University. “The U.S., by contrast, still too often operates from a crisis-to-crisis mindset in this region and has yet to provide an affirmative, long-term agenda for this region at large.”

The most worrisome Chinese investments in Cuba were detailed by the Center for Strategic and International Studies in 2023. China has four operational sites used for Signals Intelligence gathering, also called SIGINT. According to the CSIS, “SIGINT is a core element of modern spy craft. Intercepting signals transmitted by both civilian and military actors can provide countries with valuable information about their adversaries, competitors, and allies alike.”

Cuba’s proximity to the U.S. southern coastal states gives even more power to this kind of intelligence gathering. Florida, for example, hosts a myriad of military training sites that contain sensitive information.

“The Chinese Communist Party is executing a 21st-century playbook of espionage, port infrastructure, space surveillance and digital authoritarianism and Havana is the perfect laboratory for China,” said Lazarus.

China’s foothold in Cuba could also have consequences if a military conflict were to occur in the Taiwan Strait. If China tried to reclaim Taiwan and the U.S. came to the island’s aid, China would have the resources and capabilities in Latin America to potentially block or attack U.S. fleets before they reach the Indo-Pacific.

The Chinese Communist Party has already solidly implemented its technology on the island, according to the three witnesses at the subcommittee hearing. Chinese state-subsidized company Nuctech, “an advanced security and inspection solution supplier in the world” with ties to the People’s Liberation Army, operates in Cuban airports, seaports, and at customs enforcement points. Nuctech provides scanning equipment, which could mean that biometric, commercial data, or sensitive data about American supply chains could be sent back to Beijing.

Chinese technology corporations Huawei and ZTE, blacklisted in the U.S. for risks of espionage, are also extremely intertwined with Cuba’s telecommunications infrastructure. These companies helped the Cuban regime shut down online communications during the 2021 anti-government protests.

China has also made critical investments in much of the Western Hemisphere. Along with Cuba, multiple Latin American nations have joined Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative, which China uses to expand its economic and diplomatic power.

For Representative Troy Carter (D-LA), the lack of U.S. development aid in Latin America “isn’t just bad policy, it was a strategic mistake that has had real consequences on national security and regional stability. In Latin America, these decisions have been nothing short of a gift for authoritarian regimes in Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. By retreating from our role as a champion of democracy and development, we left a vacuum that autocrats have rushed to fill.”

In small islands of the Caribbean, for example, rising sea levels present an existential threat. China has helped build infrastructure that would limit the drastic consequences of climate change, while the new Trump administration has retracted from the Paris Accords and has placed climate change at the bottom of its priorities. China also invested tremendous amounts in solar power and electric vehicles in those islands, where fossil fuels must be imported and are very expensive. Clean energy represents another way to show China’s commitment to the Global South.

These investment projects come with conditions. The fear is that countries fall into a debt trap, as observed in some countries in Africa. “When I worked at U.S. Southern Command in Miami, the commander would say that what we’re seeing in Africa today is what we will see in Latin America and the Caribbean in five to ten years from now,” said Leland.

Furthermore, Cuba and Bolivia are now part of the BRICS group, an informal political cooperation between major global south countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—that aims to decentralize the global order from Western dominance. This group has emerged as a major geopolitical force, attempting to create an anti-West coalition, develop its own global currency, and create economic collaboration with the Global South.

“China’s accelerating espionage partnership with Cuba poses a major threat to U.S. and hemispheric security, bringing together Beijing’s resources and technology with Havana’s troubling capacity to penetrate U.S. agencies and security institutions,” said Andrés Martínez-Fernández, senior policy analyst for Latin America at The Heritage Foundation’s Allison Center for National Security. “The growth of China's spying footprint in Cuba is also indicative of Beijing's broader malign presence in the Americas.”


Amalia Huot-Marchand is a graduate student at Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism, specializing in politics, policy, and foreign affairs. Most recently, she was a fellow at Capitol News Illinois and freelanced with UPI, the Fulcrum, Arete News, and Tech Policy Press.

Read More

Guarding What? The Moral Cost of Militarizing Our Cities

Protestors in Chicago, August 2025

Credit: Angeles Ponpa

Guarding What? The Moral Cost of Militarizing Our Cities

A federal judge recently blocked plans to deploy the National Guard to Chicago. But the battle over militarizing American streets is far from over. On Monday, a federal appeals court lifted a temporary restraining order and ruled that the National Guard can be deployed to Portland, Oregon, amid ongoing protests at the Macadam ICE Facility.

Every time political leaders propose sending troops into cities or float invoking the Insurrection Act, they test a fragile boundary that keeps democracy in check.

Keep ReadingShow less
Joe Manchin on Taxpayer-Funded Primaries: 'They're Locking Us Out!'

Joe Manchin

Alex Wong/Getty Images

Joe Manchin on Taxpayer-Funded Primaries: 'They're Locking Us Out!'

While appearing on CNN host Michael Smerconish’s show, former Democratic U.S. Senator Joe Manchin, now a registered independent, told Smerconish that “we have to have open primaries” in order to get candidates who prioritize representation to run and have a chance to win.

“We have to change the primary,” he added. “They are locking us out.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Ingrassia Exit Highlights Rare GOP Pushback to Trump’s Personnel Picks

President Donald Trump speaks at a White House press briefing on Jan. 30, 2025.

Credit: Jonah Elkowitz/Medill News Service

Ingrassia Exit Highlights Rare GOP Pushback to Trump’s Personnel Picks

WASHINGTON — Paul Ingrassia withdrew his nomination to lead the Office of Special Counsel on Tuesday night after facing Republican pushback over past controversial statements.

While Ingrassia joins a growing list of President Donald Trump’s nominees who have withdrawn from consideration, many who have aired controversial beliefs or lack requisite qualifications have still been appointed or are still in the nomination process.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Revolution in Congressional Decision-Making
low light photography of armchairs in front of desk

A Revolution in Congressional Decision-Making

The dysfunction of today’s federal government is not simply the product of political division or individual leaders; it is rooted in the internal rules of Congress itself. The Founders, in one of their few major oversights, granted Congress the authority to make its own procedural rules (Article I, Section 5) without establishing any framework for how it should operate. Over time, this blank check has produced a legislative process built to serve partisan power, not public representation.

The result is a Congress that often rewards obstruction and gridlock over compromise and action. The Founders imagined representatives closely tied to their constituents—one member for every 30,000 to 50,000 citizens. Today, that ratio has ballooned to one for every 765,000 in the House, and in the Senate, each member can represent tens of millions (e.g., California). As the population has grown, representation has become distant and impersonal, while procedural rules have tightened the grip of party leadership. Major issues can no longer reach the floor unless the majority party permits it. The link between citizens and decisions has nearly vanished.

Keep ReadingShow less