Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Raining on Trump’s Military Parade

News

Raining on Trump’s Military Parade

President Donald Trump

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

The 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army is being celebrated today with a massive parade. There are events planned throughout the day in Washington, DC, but the parade is scheduled to kick off at 6:30 p.m. EST.

President Donald Trump said of the event, “For two and a half centuries, our brave soldiers have fought, bled, and died to keep us FREE, and now we will honor them with a wonderful Parade, one that is worthy of their service and sacrifice."


Trump, whose 79th birthday coincides with the Army celebration, has received criticism over the parade, including from Democrats who say the event is to celebrate himself.

"It’s a vulgar display. It is the kind of thing you see Kim Jong-un, you see it Putin, you see with dictators around the world that are weak and just want to demonstrate strength," said California Governor Gavin Newsom. "Weakness masquerading as strength. To fete the dear leader on his birthday? What an embarrassment."

Newsom is in the middle of a political and legal battle with Trump. A federal judge said the president's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles to quell immigration protests was illegal. An appeals court has temporarily blocked the judge's order.

"Trump is throwing himself a $30 million birthday parade just to stroke his own ego," Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) said on X. "If it was really about celebrating military families, we could put $30 million toward helping them offset the cost of their child care, food assistance and tuition."

When factoring in security and other expenses, the projected price tag is $45 million+.

Christopher Purdy, an Army veteran who served in Iraq, called the parade a facade that paints over some of the Republican president’s policies that have targeted military veterans and current service members, including cuts at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Purdy, who spoke to the Associated Press, said the parade will needlessly display U.S. military might.

Some weather forecasters are predicting the possibility of rain in the DC area today.

Mother Nature isn't the only one threatening to rain on Trump's parade. Millions are expected to protest in what organizers predict will be the strongest display of opposition to Trump’s administration since he returned to the White House.

Thousands of protests across all 50 states are planned through the No Kings movement, which organizers say seeks to reject “authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics, and the militarization of our democracy.”

Trump has warned that protesters who show up to the parade will be met with “very big force.”

However, not everyone disagrees with Trump's military parade. Among those attending will be some of the president's most devoted House supporters, such as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. “Yes, of course,” she said earlier this week. “I’m going to be there for the 250th anniversary of the Army.”

The last time Washington, DC hosted a military parade was in 1991, to celebrate victory in the first Gulf War.


Read More

Collage.
Collage by Alex Bandoni/ProPublica. Source images: Bloomberg/Getty Images, Firearm Transaction Record Form via U.S. Department of Justice and Alec MacGillis/ProPublica.

“No One Is Watching”: How Trump Reversed Biden’s Crackdown on Gun Trafficking

Marianna Mitchem grew up in the Denver suburbs, where she played high school soccer. One day in April 1999, her team faced off against a nearby rival, Columbine High. The next day, two teenagers went on a shooting rampage at Columbine, killing more than a dozen people.

The massacre left an imprint on Mitchem. After graduating from Providence College, she joined the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. “Fearing for my friends and watching what was happening — you don’t forget things like that,” she told me. “I wanted to make a difference.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Mutual Surveillance?: The History and Consequences of the Treaty on Open Skies

American flag on a military uniform

adamkaz/Getty Images

Mutual Surveillance?: The History and Consequences of the Treaty on Open Skies

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

This week's congressional agenda includes anti-fraud legislation, ICE funding, FISA Section 702 renewal debates, and major committee hearings.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Fraud, Funding, and FISA

Fraud

This week in the House is Fraud Week based on the large number of bills likely to receive a vote that in some way are intended to decrease or eliminate many different kinds of fraud. Example bills up for a vote include:

Funding

One bill will likely become law this week if it passes the House:

Keep ReadingShow less
Anti-gerrymandering sign

Florida's new congressional map, the Supreme Court's Callais decision, and challenges to voting rights protections raise urgent questions about redistricting, representation, and democratic accountability.

Bill Clark/Getty Images

Florida’s New Map and the Shrinking Window for Accountability

When the Lines Began Moving Faster Than the Law

On May 4, Governor Ron DeSantis signed Florida’s new congressional map into law. The Legislature had passed it five days earlier, 83 to 28 in the House and 21 to 17 in the Senate. The map redraws four districts in ways that election analysts project would shift them from competitive or Democratic-leaning to safe Republican, potentially expanding a delegation Republicans already control 20 to 8.

The same day the Legislature voted, the Supreme Court decided Louisiana v. Callais. The Court ruled 6 to 3 that Louisiana’s majority-minority district could not survive Equal Protection scrutiny under the standards applied by the majority. In her dissent, Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the ruling “renders Section 2 all but a dead letter” in redistricting.

Keep ReadingShow less