Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Raining on Trump’s Military Parade

News

Raining on Trump’s Military Parade

President Donald Trump

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

The 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army is being celebrated today with a massive parade. There are events planned throughout the day in Washington, DC, but the parade is scheduled to kick off at 6:30 p.m. EST.

President Donald Trump said of the event, “For two and a half centuries, our brave soldiers have fought, bled, and died to keep us FREE, and now we will honor them with a wonderful Parade, one that is worthy of their service and sacrifice."


Trump, whose 79th birthday coincides with the Army celebration, has received criticism over the parade, including from Democrats who say the event is to celebrate himself.

"It’s a vulgar display. It is the kind of thing you see Kim Jong-un, you see it Putin, you see with dictators around the world that are weak and just want to demonstrate strength," said California Governor Gavin Newsom. "Weakness masquerading as strength. To fete the dear leader on his birthday? What an embarrassment."

Newsom is in the middle of a political and legal battle with Trump. A federal judge said the president's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles to quell immigration protests was illegal. An appeals court has temporarily blocked the judge's order.

"Trump is throwing himself a $30 million birthday parade just to stroke his own ego," Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) said on X. "If it was really about celebrating military families, we could put $30 million toward helping them offset the cost of their child care, food assistance and tuition."

When factoring in security and other expenses, the projected price tag is $45 million+.

Christopher Purdy, an Army veteran who served in Iraq, called the parade a facade that paints over some of the Republican president’s policies that have targeted military veterans and current service members, including cuts at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Purdy, who spoke to the Associated Press, said the parade will needlessly display U.S. military might.

Some weather forecasters are predicting the possibility of rain in the DC area today.

Mother Nature isn't the only one threatening to rain on Trump's parade. Millions are expected to protest in what organizers predict will be the strongest display of opposition to Trump’s administration since he returned to the White House.

Thousands of protests across all 50 states are planned through the No Kings movement, which organizers say seeks to reject “authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics, and the militarization of our democracy.”

Trump has warned that protesters who show up to the parade will be met with “very big force.”

However, not everyone disagrees with Trump's military parade. Among those attending will be some of the president's most devoted House supporters, such as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. “Yes, of course,” she said earlier this week. “I’m going to be there for the 250th anniversary of the Army.”

The last time Washington, DC hosted a military parade was in 1991, to celebrate victory in the first Gulf War.


Read More

Presidential powers: Corporate abuses big concern after SCOTUS move

An oil production operation is shown in North Dakota. With the U.S. Supreme Court granting more presidential powers to the executive branch, environmental groups warned key agencies will have a harder time going after polluters.

(Adobe Stock)

Presidential powers: Corporate abuses big concern after SCOTUS move

A U.S. Supreme Court opinion issued last month expands presidential power over independent federal agencies, prompting warnings from environmental advocates about potential implications for states such as North Dakota.

The court’s conservative majority said President Donald Trump had the authority to fire a former Federal Trade Commission member without cause. Legal observers countered the opinion nullifies longstanding precedent involving the role of Congress in insulating certain federal agency officials from direct presidential control.

Keep ReadingShow less
Private Prisons and ICE Exploit Loopholes, Harm Communities

Delaney Hall Detention Facility, Newark, New Jersey.

(Photo by Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images)

Private Prisons and ICE Exploit Loopholes, Harm Communities

While Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) terrorizes Black and brown communities with racial profiling, kidnappings, inhumane treatment, fatal abuse, and killings, private prison investors are asking how ICE can detain more people to increase their profits. Private prison corporations have long profited from immigration enforcement, but they are expecting a financial windfall under the current administration. These corporations are politically and financially situated to rapidly increase detention capacity and cash in on the president’s goal of deporting one million people per year. Stopping these corporations from lining politicians’ campaign coffers is a necessary first step in ensuring that our government is accountable to the people it serves, rather than the corporations it contracts with.

ICE and private prison corporations have long had a symbiotic relationship. Ninety percent of ICE's detainees were already being held in facilities owned or operated by private prison corporations before President Trump began his second term. CoreCivic and GEO Group, two of the largest private prison corporations that lead the multi-billion dollar industry, have been contracting with immigration enforcement for decades. By 2023, ICE contracts accounted for 43 percent of CoreCivic’s revenue and 30 percent of GEO Group’s revenue. The majority of each corporation’s lobbyists have held government positions, and GEO Group’s board of directors “has extensive links with ICE.” The relationship between private prisons and ICE is the embodiment of the “'revolving door’ between the federal government and the private sector.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Federal Register Reports being printed out of a large machine.

Congress should strengthen the administrative state by writing clearer laws, limiting delegated authority, and requiring periodic reauthorization of agency powers.

Photo courtesy of Luka Jacobi-Krohn

Putting the Guardrails Back on Delegations of Power

Congress needs to write better laws instead of dismantling the administrative state.

Debates over the administrative state focus on whether these agencies have accrued too much power. Some argue that the solution is to severely weaken or, in extreme scenarios, dismantle these federal agencies. However, the issue is not the existence of these agencies but actually how Congress writes its laws. When statutes are drafted with vague language, agencies are left to interpret the scope, and courts are forced to set the boundaries. This results in constant litigation and generally regulatory instability. If Congress actually wants a more durable and accountable regulatory system, they need to start with themselves by writing clearer laws.

Keep ReadingShow less
Businesspeople walking in line across world map, painted on asphalt

America's immigration debate reflects a deeper question: Does America still believe in itself? A historical look at immigration, assimilation, and American identity.

Klaus Vedfelt / Getty Images

What Immigration Debates Reveal About National Confidence

America has spent 250 years arguing about immigrants.

But beneath the arguments about visas, walls, asylum claims, deportations, and border security lies a more uncomfortable question:

Keep ReadingShow less