Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Immigration Crackdowns Fuel a Lucrative Industry Backing Political Campaigns

Opinion

federal agent pushes the wife of a detained man

A federal agent pushes the wife of the detained man from Ecuador to the ground on September 25, 2025 in New York City. Despite getting continuances on their asylum claims, Federal agents will still detain immigrants who appear for their court dates at the Jacob K. Javits building at 26 Federal Plaza.

(Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

Immigration enforcement is not just a matter of policy—it’s a billion-dollar business. And behind the Trump Administration's rhetoric of “law and order” lies a disturbing truth: deportation-industrial complexes are not only profiting from human suffering, they’re bankrolling political campaigns that promise more of it.

At the center of this nexus is the GEO Group, one of the largest private prison and detention facility operators in the United States. The GEO Group has contributed over $1 million to pro-Trump political action committees, including $500,000 in February 2024 and an additional $500,000 split between August and September of that same year, through its subsidiary, Geo Acquisition II Inc.


Private detention giants, such as GEO Group and CoreCivic, have positioned themselves as indispensable partners in the federal government’s immigration crackdown. Their reward? Lucrative contracts, ballooning revenue, and direct access to the political machinery shaping our borders. Executives openly tout mass deportation as a growth opportunity.

“We believe that the private sector will play a critical role in assisting the government in carrying out its objectives,” said George Zoley, GEO Group’s executive chairman, during a November 2024 earnings call. “The GEO Group was built for this unique moment in our country’s history and the opportunities that it will bring.”

This is not a partisan critique. Under both Democratic and Republican administrations, these companies have thrived. During the Obama era, deportations hit record highs, and private detention firms quietly expanded their influence. Today, under Trump’s second term, they’re cashing in on a $170 billion enforcement bill that reopens shuttered facilities and doubles detention capacity. Eighty-five percent of detainees are now held in privately run centers.

CoreCivic has focused its influence at the state level, funding campaigns in Arizona and Texas, where immigration enforcement is aggressive and detention centers are concentrated. The revolving door between government and industry further entrenches this system, with former officials from ICE and DHS taking roles in private detention firms and shaping policy from both sides.

Yet behind the profit margins lie troubling allegations of abuse, negligence, and corruption.

Video shows violent confrontation at NYC immigration court

cbs new york footage Video shows violent confrontation at NYC immigration court www.cbsnews.com

There was a violent confrontation at a Manhattan immigration court Thursday. City Comptroller Brad Lander says an ICE agent was caught on video pushing a woman to the ground moments after her husband was detained, but as CBS News New York's Ali Bauman reports, the Department of Homeland Security has remained silent about what exactly happened.

ICE enforcement has escalated sharply. According to the Deportation Data Project, daily detentions surged from 300 to over 1,000, disproportionately targeting Hispanics, Latinos in broad, indiscriminate sweeps. These aggressive tactics often bypass due process and sow fear across all immigrant communities.

The public response has been swift and emotional. Videos circulate showing children sobbing and parents being taken into custody, prompting widespread protests and tense confrontations between federal agents and local residents. Immigration lawyers warned that such tactics discouraged migrants from attending court hearings, undermining the integrity of the legal system.

CoreCivic’s South Texas Family Residential Center—once closed due to cost concerns and the death of a toddler—is being reopened. No accountability. No reform. Just recycled trauma under a new contract.

Tom Homan—former acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and now President Trump’s Border Czar—was the subject of a federal bribery investigation. The probe stemmed from a 2024 FBI sting operation in which undercover agents, posing as business executives, allegedly recorded Homan accepting $50,000 in cash inside a restaurant takeout bag. In exchange, Homan reportedly suggested he could help secure immigration-related government contracts for their companies if appointed to a senior role in a second Trump administration.

We cannot accept a system where masked ICE agents detain undocumented immigrants who are overwhelmingly law-abiding members of our communities. These are not the “most dangerous” individuals the Trump administration claims to pursue—they are our neighbors, our coworkers, our loved ones. Parents. Caregivers. People with deep roots and no criminal records. Yet they are treated as fugitives, their lives upended for the sake of political theater.

But there is a way forward—if we’re willing to confront the architecture of exploitation and build something better.

We must:

  • End private detention contracts. Public facilities, while imperfect, are subject to greater oversight and democratic control. Legislation like the “Justice Is Not for Sale Act” offers a path. Cities and counties can also refuse to issue permits and cooperate with ICE.
  • Invest in community-based alternatives, such as case management programs, legal aid, and housing support. These models are more humane, more effective, and far less expensive.
  • Enforce transparency. Subpoena power, independent monitors, and whistleblower protections are essential to exposing abuse and preventing cover-ups.
  • Decouple campaign finance from enforcement contracts. No company profiting from detention should be allowed to fund the politicians who expand it.

When immigration policy is driven by profit, migrants become revenue streams, abuse becomes a line item, and democracy becomes a pay-to-play system where campaign donations shape who gets detained, deported, or discarded.

This is not enforcement—it is erasure. The political spectacle is prioritized over substance, and the human cost is buried beneath campaign slogans and billion-dollar contracts.

We must choose differently. Because when democracy is sold to the highest bidder, we all pay the price. And when we allow cruelty to become currency, we lose more than policy debates—we lose our moral compass.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network. Balta is the only person to serve twice as president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists (NAHJ).


Read More

​Teal shoes are displayed outside Naval Medical Center Portsmouth

Teal shoes are displayed outside Naval Medical Center Portsmouth in April 2018 as part of Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month.

Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Kris R. Lindstrom/U.S. Navy

Military Sexual Trauma Survivors Can’t Sue the Government. A New Bill Could Change That.

When Mayra Diaz opened the door of her Army barracks room in 2022, she didn’t realize it was the beginning of the end of her military career.

She had never met the soldier standing in front of her, Sgt. Greville Clarke. She didn’t know he had sexually assaulted three other women on base over the past 15 months, including one he threatened at knifepoint.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Horizontal photo of a DEMOCRATIC PARTY FLAG

Horizontal photo of a DEMOCRATIC PARTY FLAG with a stylized DONKEY with 3 white stars on blue top of donkey and two red feet. Flag is laying on top of a red, white, and blue American Flag.

Getty Images

How to Define the Democratic Party - Left or Centrist?

Labels can be misleading and misused. The label "Centrist" is empowering because it signifies you are mainstream, not extreme, a place where all people can come together. To be labeled "Left" is to place you outside the mainstream, extreme; left connotes a kind of kookiness as well as—horror of horrors—Socialism.

But are the labels accurate? For most of the 20th century, the Democratic Party was, without question, the party that championed the working man, the average person—the people. But they were nevertheless firm capitalists—they were not Socialists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Illustration of US Capitol

Illustration of US Capitol

Illustration provided

Are States and Localities Required to Cooperate with ICE?

Polls show a majority of Americans disapprove of how Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is doing its job, with outrage stoked by a surge in immigration arrests across the country and multiple killings by federal immigration officials. In many places, residents are against their state and local officials cooperating with immigration authorities. And many local law enforcement leaders argue that cooperating with federal immigration enforcement operations undermines public safety by taking resources away from local priorities and eroding communities’ trust in law enforcement.

Trump administration officials have repeatedly argued that states and localities are legally obligated to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement efforts. They have also warned that state and local laws limiting cooperation with ICE will be met with harsh crackdowns.

Keep ReadingShow less
people in a boardroom


Happy female entrepreneur with colleagues sitting at a desk in an office

Getty images

Understanding The Dissolution of Federal DEI Offices and Initiatives: Debate and Implications

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Background

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion efforts are organizational policies and initiatives that aim to equitably distribute opportunities and to create accepting workplaces for marginalized populations. These policies create hiring and recruitment guidelines to hire, retain, and promote individuals from those backgrounds. Supporters of these policies argue they are necessary in driving meaningful social progress, while critics argue they subordinate the role of merit in awarding opportunities.

Keep ReadingShow less