Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Fixing Congressional Oversight Starts With Caseworkers

Opinion

People meeting with advisor, caseworker. Paperwork. Meeting.

Congress should recognize that caseworkers are subject-matter experts and put their knowledge to use.

Getty Images, Fotografía de eLuVe

Congress writes laws but rarely follows up on how they are implemented. When things inevitably go wrong, it passes the buck to agencies, which often hire consultants to investigate the problem at great expense. However, Congress could do the job itself for free. Congress already employs a cadre of staff that knows the gory details of government programs—namely, caseworkers.

Caseworkers are staff employed by members of Congress to help their constituents navigate the federal bureaucracy. When the public has problems with federal agencies—everything from mishandled disability applications to poor postal service—caseworkers are the go-between to sort things out. In helping the public, caseworkers learn how the implementation of government programs can go awry.


Congress invests heavily in casework; by our calculations, caseworkers are about 15 percent of Congressional office staff. But Congress does not tap into their knowledge, largely because caseworkers are based in their home districts, where they work with constituents in person. As caseworkers are far from the politics of the U.S. Capitol, the Washington establishment often wrongly thinks of them as merely entry-level customer service representatives.

Instead, Congress should recognize that they are subject-matter experts and put their knowledge to use. Congress could benefit from their expertise by turning caseworkers loose on three problems: identifying root causes of dysfunction, spotting emerging problems, and creating better-informed policy.

Caseworkers could help identify the source of longstanding problems. When they determine why the bureaucracy made a mistake for constituents, they often discover the underlying cause. For example, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) sometimes improperly continues paying dependent benefits to disabled soldiers even after their children become too old to be eligible. These veterans later discover that their disability checks have been cut off and the VA is demanding that they repay tens of thousands of dollars. Caseworkers who assist these veterans know the cause: the VA has no way for veterans to amend their listed dependents themselves. These changes must be made manually by bureaucrats, with only a handful of employees processing updates for the entire country.

To fix these longstanding problems, oversight staff should consult caseworkers for their insight. Congressional committees that oversee agencies providing social services could host a "staff day" at the beginning of each Congress, incorporating caseworkers' expertise into their oversight plans.

Casework could provide Congress with an early warning signal to spot emerging problems. For example, Rep. Loudermilk's staff (R-Ga.) had rarely received postal complaints until March 2024, when they began receiving tens and then hundreds of complaints about mail delays and missing items. His caseworkers soon uncovered that Georgia was the testing ground for a new U.S. Postal Service reorganization. After discovering this, lawmakers conducted oversight to ensure tax returns and primary ballots would be delivered promptly.

To help other offices replicate this success, Congress needs data management tools that summarize complaints heard by individual legislators. The House has already begun creating a dashboard of anonymized casework data, which could also be adopted by the Senate. Congressional committees should use these tools for oversight and invest in their success.

Congress could ask caseworkers to help write better laws in the future. Lawmakers may not understand implementation details but good caseworkers do. For example, the proposed TAS Act aims to address common taxpayer complaints about the IRS; it draws upon recommendations from the Taxpayer Advocate Service, which in turn drew upon Congressional casework inquiries.

Congress should prioritize incorporating such insight directly from caseworkers. Congressional committees might even borrow experienced caseworkers to provide input in strengthening draft bills, in addition to incorporating casework data into oversight plans.

In today's era of low trust in government, good casework matters more than ever. Caseworkers are the first line of defense for constituents, demonstrating that interactions with government can reflect trust, accountability, and dignity. More than that, caseworkers could rebuild trust in government by helping Congress hold the government accountable and write better laws. This requires that Congress take casework more seriously and view it as an integral part of oversight and legislation.

So, the next time Congress wants to sort out a thorny problem, it shouldn't send agencies running to consultants to find solutions. Instead, lawmakers should schedule a happy hour with their caseworkers.

Anne Meeker is a former Director of Constituent Services and Deputy Director of POPVOX Foundation, a nonpartisan nonprofit that helps democratic institutions keep pace with a rapidly changing world.

Kevin Hawickhorst is a Policy Analyst at the Foundation for American Innovation, a think tank that develops technology, talent, and ideas that support a better, freer, and more abundant future.


Read More

An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed upon entering the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on June 6, 2023 in New York City. New York City has provided sanctuary to over 46,000 asylum seekers since 2013, when the city passed a law prohibiting city agencies from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement agencies unless there is a warrant for the person's arrest.(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed.
(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

The Power of the Purse and Executive Discretion: ICE Expansion Under the Trump Administration

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Core Constitutional Debate: Expanded ICE enforcement under the Trump Administration raises a core constitutional question: Does Article II executive power override Article I’s congressional power of the purse?
  • Executive Justification: The primary constitutional justification for expanded ICE enforcement is The Unitary Executive Theory.
  • Separation of Powers: Critics argue that the Unitary Executive Theory undermines Congress’s power of the purse.
  • Moral Conflict: Expanded ICE enforcement has sparked a moral debate, as concerns over due process and civil liberties clash with claims of increased public safety and national security.

Where is ICE Funding Coming From?

Since the beginning of the current Trump Administration, immigration enforcement has undergone transformative change and become one of the most contested issues in the federal government. On his first day in office, President Trump issued Executive Order 14159, which directs executive agencies to implement stricter immigration enforcement practices. In order to implement these practices, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a budget reconciliation package that paired state and local tax cuts with immigration funding. This allocated $170.7 billion in immigration-related funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to spend by 2029.

Keep ReadingShow less
Towards a Reformed Capitalism
oval brown wooden conference table and chairs inside conference room

Towards a Reformed Capitalism

Despite all the laws and regulations that apply to corporations, which for the most part are designed to make corporations more responsive to the greater good, corporations have wreaked great harm on our environment, their workers, their customers, and the general public. Despite all the rules, capitalism can still pretty much do what it wants.

The problem is not that the laws and regulations are not enforced, although that is partly true. The problem is more that the laws and regulations are weak because of the strong influence corporations have on both Congress (this is true of Democrats as well as Republicans) and those responsible for regulating.

Keep ReadingShow less
Families of Americans Overseas Wrongfully Detained Bring Advocacy to Capitol Hill

The Bring Our Families Home campaign brought together loved ones of Americans wrongly detained overseas to display portraits in the Senate Russell Rotunda on Wednesday, May 6.

(Jacques Abou-Rizk, MNS)

Families of Americans Overseas Wrongfully Detained Bring Advocacy to Capitol Hill

WASHINGTON – American journalist Reza Valizadeh visited his elderly Iranian parents in March 2024 for the first time in 15 years. Valizadeh’s stories for Voice of America and other U.S. government-funded outlets often criticized the Iranian regime. So before traveling, he sought and received confirmation that he would be safe from a high-ranking commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a branch of Iran’s armed forces. However, in September that same year, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps arrested Valizadeh, and Tehran’s Revolutionary Court sentenced him to ten years in prison for “collaboration with a hostile government.”

In the Rotunda of the Senate Russell Building last week, the Bring Our Families Home campaign set up portraits of Valizadeh and 12 other Americans currently wrongfully detained overseas. The group, family members of illegitimately detained Americans, appealed to Congress to push for their safe return. Each foam poster board included the name, home state, and country of detainment. The display also included portraits of the 33 people released after advocacy by the James W. Foley Foundation.

Keep ReadingShow less
DHS Funding During the Shutdown
Getty Images, Charles-McClintock Wilson

DHS Funding During the Shutdown

When Congress failed to approve funding for the Department of Homeland Security for the remainder of this fiscal year in February, almost all of its employees began to work without pay. That situation changed, however, on April 3, when President Donald Trump issued a memorandum ordering the DHS secretary and director of the Office of Management and Budget to “use funds that have a reasonable and logical nexus to the functions of DHS” to pay its employees and issue back pay.

Trump shifted money to avoid the political embarrassment that would be caused by the collapse of airport security screening through the actions of disgruntled agents and the disruption to air travel that would ensue. But it’s legally dubious.

Keep ReadingShow less