Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

When Employers Act, Survivors Thrive: The Call to American Businesses

Opinion

When Employers Act, Survivors Thrive: The Call to American Businesses
woman with hands tied
Photo by engin akyurt on Unsplash

The latest comment from Mr. Trump, minimizing domestic violence to “a little fight with the Wife,” completely dismisses that America is suffering from a public health crisis. According to the Council on Criminal Justice, “domestic violence was the only offense that rose by 3% during the first half of 2025” compared to the same months in 2024, amongst other violent offenses such as homicide and aggravated assault. Domestic violence is not a personal matter; it is a community issue.

America continues to see an increase in domestic violence because we do not focus on protective factors such as economic security.


Financial abuse is experienced by 99% of domestic violence victims, often making these victims financially dependent on their abusers, making it all the more difficult to flee. The prevalence of financial abuse is rooted in coercive control. It is a pattern of domination and entrapment that goes beyond physical harm. It strips victims of their autonomy and creates dependency. These abuses have long-term consequences that often lead to housing insecurity or homelessness.

In my state, California, the legislature made some progress when they passed SB 975 (effective July 1st) to allow survivors to contest coerced debt in court and hold abusers accountable.

Employers can economically empower victims before it is too late.

Many workplaces' federal laws indirectly apply to victims of domestic violence, such as FMLA or OSHA, for time off or safety concerns. Some states, such as California, New York, or Illinois, have more extensive and specific protections for victims.

Beyond these legal protections imposed on employers, what’s in it for them?

Nowadays, people are seeking a workplace whose values align with their own. Companies’ cultures are changing and leaning towards becoming a more supportive environment because they understand that it boosts productivity.

As a domestic violence advocate, my previous employers asked me to assist another coworker who was fleeing. Needless to say, the immense support from the agency and other team members made this person feel safer and supported. Mutual respect and reciprocity start to be the norm.

During the January 2025 wildfire that took Los Angeles by surprise, we saw how the “unsung heroes”-mainly community members - came together to support those in need.

If that is not enough to appeal to people’s hearts, here is a more logical benefit for employers.

The Society for Human Resource Management reported in 2017 that the cost to hire and train a replacement for an employee earning $60,000 is between $30,000 and $45,000. When an employee is supported during a time of crisis, they are more likely to remain loyal and dedicated to their employer. A culture of trust will improve morale and increase employee retention.

As domestic violence expert Dr. Kader Gumus explains, “These supportive environments help survivors manage their trauma and stress, contributing to their overall well-being and ability to function effectively at work.”

In the long term, this symbiotic partnership can result in a mutually beneficial situation. It widens the safety net when people are in crisis, and it enables a more robust workforce.

Employers have the power to change lives. They are not bystanders; they are key players on the front line of prevention. When they choose to stand with survivors, they help rewrite futures, not just for individuals, but for families and communities. It’s time we recognize that the fight to end domestic violence doesn’t stop at the shelter door or the courthouse steps. It extends to every boardroom, breakroom, and workplace across the country. When employers act, survivors thrive.

Stephanie Whack is a survivor of domestic violence, an advocate at the intersection of victimization and homelessness, and a member of The OpEd Project Public Voices Fellowship on Domestic Violence and Economic Security. In 2024, she was awarded the LA City Dr. Marjorie Braude Award for innovative collaboration in serving victims of domestic violence.


Read More

​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult man holds a microphone while asking a question during a town hall meeting.

Congress ignored 90% of public support for background checks. Learn how citizen assemblies and sortition helped Ireland break gridlock and could work in the US.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Consensus Without Power: How Sortition Could Break America's Legislative Gridlock

In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting killed twenty children, the US Senate voted on the Manchin-Toomey Act to expand background checks and to include gun-show and internet sales of firearms. Roughly nine in ten Americans, including a majority of gun owners, supported the bill—a figure that has held steady across more than a decade of polling. It fell short of the 60-vote threshold by six votes. This was not an outlier. On complex issues, representatives often fail to translate public consensus into reality. Research shows that legislators consistently vote in line with donor and interest group preferences over constituent opinion. Before the vote, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned every senator it would “rate” their vote on its annual rating system, and a low NRA rating could cost senators their next primary. Consequently, the bill died 54-46, and the majority of Americans watched, powerless, as their consensus was overridden by self-interested representatives.

Liberal democracies need a method to bypass electoral incentives that run counter to public opinion. One already exists: Ireland faced the same stalemate on complex issues before it instituted a process called sortition. The beauty of sortition lies in its removal of the primary pressure that misaligns representatives’ interests from public interest: reelection. Much like jury duty, citizens are randomly drawn from the population. An independent body then stratifies the pool, so the final group mirrors the country by age, gender, geography, and income. The group meets over weeks or months, hearing from experts and the public, as well as debating frequently. At the end, it issues a recommendation that parliament may then put to a referendum or pass into law.

Keep ReadingShow less
California’s New Law Aims To Close a Housing Gap for Domestic Violence Survivors
Emily Scherer for The 19th; Getty Images

California’s New Law Aims To Close a Housing Gap for Domestic Violence Survivors

Domestic violence survivors often struggle to find housing, and California’s “Unseen and Unheard Housing Act” will help make more housing available to meet their specific needs.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the bill Sunday requiring cities and counties to factor in domestic violence survivors when planning for future housing.

Keep ReadingShow less