Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

When Employers Act, Survivors Thrive: The Call to American Businesses

Opinion

When Employers Act, Survivors Thrive: The Call to American Businesses
woman with hands tied
Photo by engin akyurt on Unsplash

The latest comment from Mr. Trump, minimizing domestic violence to “a little fight with the Wife,” completely dismisses that America is suffering from a public health crisis. According to the Council on Criminal Justice, “domestic violence was the only offense that rose by 3% during the first half of 2025” compared to the same months in 2024, amongst other violent offenses such as homicide and aggravated assault. Domestic violence is not a personal matter; it is a community issue.

America continues to see an increase in domestic violence because we do not focus on protective factors such as economic security.


Financial abuse is experienced by 99% of domestic violence victims, often making these victims financially dependent on their abusers, making it all the more difficult to flee. The prevalence of financial abuse is rooted in coercive control. It is a pattern of domination and entrapment that goes beyond physical harm. It strips victims of their autonomy and creates dependency. These abuses have long-term consequences that often lead to housing insecurity or homelessness.

In my state, California, the legislature made some progress when they passed SB 975 (effective July 1st) to allow survivors to contest coerced debt in court and hold abusers accountable.

Employers can economically empower victims before it is too late.

Many workplaces' federal laws indirectly apply to victims of domestic violence, such as FMLA or OSHA, for time off or safety concerns. Some states, such as California, New York, or Illinois, have more extensive and specific protections for victims.

Beyond these legal protections imposed on employers, what’s in it for them?

Nowadays, people are seeking a workplace whose values align with their own. Companies’ cultures are changing and leaning towards becoming a more supportive environment because they understand that it boosts productivity.

As a domestic violence advocate, my previous employers asked me to assist another coworker who was fleeing. Needless to say, the immense support from the agency and other team members made this person feel safer and supported. Mutual respect and reciprocity start to be the norm.

During the January 2025 wildfire that took Los Angeles by surprise, we saw how the “unsung heroes”-mainly community members - came together to support those in need.

If that is not enough to appeal to people’s hearts, here is a more logical benefit for employers.

The Society for Human Resource Management reported in 2017 that the cost to hire and train a replacement for an employee earning $60,000 is between $30,000 and $45,000. When an employee is supported during a time of crisis, they are more likely to remain loyal and dedicated to their employer. A culture of trust will improve morale and increase employee retention.

As domestic violence expert Dr. Kader Gumus explains, “These supportive environments help survivors manage their trauma and stress, contributing to their overall well-being and ability to function effectively at work.”

In the long term, this symbiotic partnership can result in a mutually beneficial situation. It widens the safety net when people are in crisis, and it enables a more robust workforce.

Employers have the power to change lives. They are not bystanders; they are key players on the front line of prevention. When they choose to stand with survivors, they help rewrite futures, not just for individuals, but for families and communities. It’s time we recognize that the fight to end domestic violence doesn’t stop at the shelter door or the courthouse steps. It extends to every boardroom, breakroom, and workplace across the country. When employers act, survivors thrive.

Stephanie Whack is a survivor of domestic violence, an advocate at the intersection of victimization and homelessness, and a member of The OpEd Project Public Voices Fellowship on Domestic Violence and Economic Security. In 2024, she was awarded the LA City Dr. Marjorie Braude Award for innovative collaboration in serving victims of domestic violence.


Read More

NRF Moves to Defend Utah’s Fair Map Against Gerrymandering Lawsuit

USA Election Collage With The State Map Of Utah.

Getty Images

NRF Moves to Defend Utah’s Fair Map Against Gerrymandering Lawsuit

On Wednesday, February 11, the National Redistricting Foundation (NRF) asked a federal court to join a newly filed lawsuit to protect Utah’s new, fair congressional map and defend our system of checks and balances.

The NRF is a non‑profit foundation whose mission is to dismantle unfair electoral maps and create a redistricting system grounded in democratic values. By helping to create more just and representative electoral districts across the country, the organization aims to restore the public’s faith in a true representative democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Constitutional Provision We Ignored for 150 Years

Voter registration in Wisconsin

Michael Newman

A Constitutional Provision We Ignored for 150 Years

Imagine there was a way to discourage states from passing photo voter ID laws, restricting early voting, purging voter registration rolls, or otherwise suppressing voter turnout. What if any state that did so risked losing seats in the House of Representatives?

Surprisingly, this is not merely an idle fantasy of voting rights activists, but an actual plan envisioned in Section 2 of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 – but never enforced.

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pier C Park waterfront walkway and in the background the One World Trade Center on the left and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad and Ferry Terminal Clock Tower on the right

View of the Pier C Park waterfront walkway and in the background the One World Trade Center on the left and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad and Ferry Terminal Clock Tower on the right

Getty Images, Philippe Debled

The City Where Traffic Fatalities Vanished

A U.S. city of 60,000 people would typically see around six to eight traffic fatalities every year. But Hoboken, New Jersey? They haven’t had a single fatal crash for nine years — since January 17, 2017, to be exact.

Campaigns for seatbelts, lower speed limits and sober driving have brought national death tolls from car crashes down from a peak in the first half of the 20th century. However, many still assume some traffic deaths as an unavoidable cost of car culture.

Keep ReadingShow less