Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

When Employers Act, Survivors Thrive: The Call to American Businesses

Opinion

When Employers Act, Survivors Thrive: The Call to American Businesses
woman with hands tied
Photo by engin akyurt on Unsplash

The latest comment from Mr. Trump, minimizing domestic violence to “a little fight with the Wife,” completely dismisses that America is suffering from a public health crisis. According to the Council on Criminal Justice, “domestic violence was the only offense that rose by 3% during the first half of 2025” compared to the same months in 2024, amongst other violent offenses such as homicide and aggravated assault. Domestic violence is not a personal matter; it is a community issue.

America continues to see an increase in domestic violence because we do not focus on protective factors such as economic security.


Financial abuse is experienced by 99% of domestic violence victims, often making these victims financially dependent on their abusers, making it all the more difficult to flee. The prevalence of financial abuse is rooted in coercive control. It is a pattern of domination and entrapment that goes beyond physical harm. It strips victims of their autonomy and creates dependency. These abuses have long-term consequences that often lead to housing insecurity or homelessness.

In my state, California, the legislature made some progress when they passed SB 975 (effective July 1st) to allow survivors to contest coerced debt in court and hold abusers accountable.

Employers can economically empower victims before it is too late.

Many workplaces' federal laws indirectly apply to victims of domestic violence, such as FMLA or OSHA, for time off or safety concerns. Some states, such as California, New York, or Illinois, have more extensive and specific protections for victims.

Beyond these legal protections imposed on employers, what’s in it for them?

Nowadays, people are seeking a workplace whose values align with their own. Companies’ cultures are changing and leaning towards becoming a more supportive environment because they understand that it boosts productivity.

As a domestic violence advocate, my previous employers asked me to assist another coworker who was fleeing. Needless to say, the immense support from the agency and other team members made this person feel safer and supported. Mutual respect and reciprocity start to be the norm.

During the January 2025 wildfire that took Los Angeles by surprise, we saw how the “unsung heroes”-mainly community members - came together to support those in need.

If that is not enough to appeal to people’s hearts, here is a more logical benefit for employers.

The Society for Human Resource Management reported in 2017 that the cost to hire and train a replacement for an employee earning $60,000 is between $30,000 and $45,000. When an employee is supported during a time of crisis, they are more likely to remain loyal and dedicated to their employer. A culture of trust will improve morale and increase employee retention.

As domestic violence expert Dr. Kader Gumus explains, “These supportive environments help survivors manage their trauma and stress, contributing to their overall well-being and ability to function effectively at work.”

In the long term, this symbiotic partnership can result in a mutually beneficial situation. It widens the safety net when people are in crisis, and it enables a more robust workforce.

Employers have the power to change lives. They are not bystanders; they are key players on the front line of prevention. When they choose to stand with survivors, they help rewrite futures, not just for individuals, but for families and communities. It’s time we recognize that the fight to end domestic violence doesn’t stop at the shelter door or the courthouse steps. It extends to every boardroom, breakroom, and workplace across the country. When employers act, survivors thrive.

Stephanie Whack is a survivor of domestic violence, an advocate at the intersection of victimization and homelessness, and a member of The OpEd Project Public Voices Fellowship on Domestic Violence and Economic Security. In 2024, she was awarded the LA City Dr. Marjorie Braude Award for innovative collaboration in serving victims of domestic violence.


Read More

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less
New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (L) and Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) lead a group of fellow Republicans through Statuary Hall on the way to a news conference on the 28th day of the federal government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Every January 1st, many Americans face their failings and resolve to do better by making New Year’s Resolutions. Wouldn’t it be delightful if Congress would do the same? According to Gallup, half of all Americans currently have very little confidence in Congress. And while confidence in our government institutions is shrinking across the board, Congress is near rock bottom. With that in mind, here is a list of resolutions Congress could make and keep, which would help to rebuild public trust in Congress and our government institutions. Let’s start with:

1 – Working for the American people. We elect our senators and representatives to work on our behalf – not on their behalf or on behalf of the wealthiest donors, but on our behalf. There are many issues on which a large majority of Americans agree but Congress can’t. Congress should resolve to address those issues.

Keep ReadingShow less