Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

TheaterWorks Hartford Presents “English”: A Deep Dive Into Language, Culture, and Identity

News

The cast of "English," showcasing at TheaterWorks Hartford.

TheaterWorks Hartford marks its 40th season with English, Sanaz Toossi’s Pulitzer Prize-winning play about language, identity, and belonging.

Photo by Julian Barlow

This autumn, class is in session. TheaterWorks Hartford celebrates its 40th season with the Pulitzer Prize-winning play, “English” by Sanaz Toossi.

This heartfelt, timely piece is a co-production between TWH and Long Wharf Theater. “English” premieres in Hartford on Oct. 2 and runs through Nov. 2, 2025—before showcasing on Southern Connecticut State University’s campus in January 2026.


Audiences are transported to a classroom in Karaj, Iran, in 2008—where a group of four adults prepare to take the TOEFL (Test of English as a Foreign Language). The class’s mantra is “English Only,” which, of course, isn’t followed all the time. The play centers on these individuals and their personal reasons for needing a good test score.

English…is a precise study of language’s significance,” stated The Guardian’s review in January 2025. “The 2023 Pulitzer prize winner slyly presents as a comedy about studying a foreign language, but eventually blooms into an evocation of grief and assimilation.”

Iranian-American Director Arya Shahi shared that an essential theme of the performance is how language influences identity, growth, and belonging.

“It is a story that is so much bigger than just one demographic…” Shahi told CT Latino News. “It is a story that applies to anybody that has ever tried to be bilingual…it speaks so beautifully to how our words are like our verbal DNA.”

Shahi highlighted how Sanaz Toossi portrays the people in “English”; how important it is that she shares the stories of five unique, complex, messy people.

He said, especially in the narrative world and in stories of underrepresented communities, there’s a tendency to clean characters up. There’s an expectation of making people “to be perfect others and representatives.”

Shahi added, “What I love about a piece like this is that it does not mention the politics of Iran once. It does not mention the stories that I thought we had to tell as Iranians.”

Instead, Sanaz Toossi tells “the story of people having to learn language, and the reasons why they’re learning the language slowly bleed into the plot. Those reasons are very personal, and they are very rooted in what these people want for their lives, which I think is the exact way you need to create a piece of art that engenders empathy rather than something that feels like advocacy or feels overtly political,” said Shahi.

Photo by Julian Barlow.

In 2023, when Shahi first heard news of “English” winning a Pulitzer, he was in rehearsal for Water for Elephants. Despite not knowing playwright Sanaz Toossi or having a chance to read the play yet—he stepped into another room and, overcome with emotion, cried for a moment.

“It was just this really powerful feeling,” Shahi shared—adding that, since he was a kid, he never thought he would see such celebration or esteem over this kind of Iranian representation. “That’s when the play entered my consciousness and my emotional system.”

Soon after, Shahi was asked by The Old Globe, where he had previously worked on a few productions, to direct “English”. He immediately said yes.

“I think I just realized that this story has a long life,” Shahi explained. “There is still so much to learn from the text. I think it’s one of the Great American Plays and I don’t say that lightly.”

Photo by Julian Barlow.

Shahi expressed excitement about directing “English” at TWH and collaborating with an entirely new cast and crew for this production. He shared that there was a moment, in rehearsal, when two actors realized how their own assumptions about the characters they were playing were changing.

“I think there are so many interpretations of these characters that could ring true, that the job of what we’re doing here in Hartford, what the job of the creative team is, is to create our version that feels the trustest extension of the people that are involved in this production,” said Shahi.

On the topic of ethnicity and nationality pertaining to the play’s cast and crew, Shahi emphasized that it’s most important to him that his team creates “a synthesis of diverse viewpoints,” and that’s solely possible when team members can bring their unique backgrounds, identities, and experiences into the production.

“Hopefully, as a director, we can create a space where everyone feels like we are being stretched and they are contributing,” said Shahi. With that said, Shahi is working with a mostly Iranian team—the first time he’s ever worked with this many Iranian individuals on a creative team before.

Shahi also spoke about the play’s creative and stunning score by Iranian sound designer and composer Bahar Royaee.

“I think the sound design in this production is absolutely, weirdly, one of the most unique things about this production,” said Shahi, who’s a musician himself. “It’s really rooted in that question, ‘As you’re trying to become something else, what happens to the old thing?’ And I am so fascinated by how we can synthesize and distort classic Iranian instruments to sound unidentifiable.”

The “English” cast includes: Neagheen Homaifar, starring as Marjan; Sahar Milani as Elham; Afsheen Misaghi as Omid; Pantea Ommi as Roya; and Anahita Monfared as Goli. The crew includes: Sadra Tehrani on set design, Dina El-Aziz on costume design, Mary Ellen Stebbins on lighting design, Bahar Royaee on sound design, and Gregory Jafari Van Acker as the casting director.

Learn more about the performance and purchase tickets at twhartford.org or by calling the box office at 860-527-7838. Tickets range from $25 to $70. The show runs for approximately 100 minutes with no intermission.

Belén Dumont is a freelance reporter and associate editor at The Fulcrum.

TheaterWorks Hartford Presents “English”: A Deep Dive Into Language, Culture, and Identity was originally published by CT Latino News and is republished with permission.

Read More

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

The rise of book bans and erasure of Black history from classrooms emotionally and systematically harms Black children. It's critical that we urge educators to represent Black experiences and stories in class.

Getty Images, Klaus Vedfelt

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

When my son, Jonathan, was born, one of the first children’s books I bought was "So Much" by Trish Cooke. I was captivated by its joyful depiction of a Black family loving their baby boy. I read it to him often, wanting him to know that he was deeply loved, seen, and valued. In an era when politicians are banning books, sanitizing curricula, and policing the teaching of Black history, the idea of affirming Black children’s identities is miscast as divisive and wrong. Forty-two states have proposed or passed legislation restricting how race and history can be taught, including Black history. PEN America reported that nearly 16,000 books (many featuring Black stories) were banned from schools within the last three years across 43 states. These prohibitive policies and bans are presented as protecting the ‘feelings’ of White children, while at the same time ignoring and invalidating the feelings of Black children who live daily with the pain of erasure, distortion, and disregard in schools.

When I hear and see the ongoing devaluation of Black children in schools and public life, I, and other Black parents, recognize this pain firsthand. For instance, recently, my teenage granddaughter, Jaliyah, texted me, asking to visit the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., because she had heard that the President planned to close it. For what felt like the millionth time, my heart broke with the understanding that too many people fail to rally on behalf of Black children. Jaliyah’s question revealed what so many Black children intuitively understand—that their histories, their feelings, and their futures are often treated as expendable.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep ReadingShow less
So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

Conceptual image of multiple human face shapes in a variety of colors illustrating different races

Getty Images

So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

It is no secret that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack in our country. They have been blamed for undermining free speech, meritocracy, and America itself. The University of Virginia is the latest to settle with the government and walk away from its DEI initiatives rather than defend its programs or find a new solution.

Those who decry DEI say they do so in the name of meritocracy. They argue that those who benefit from DEI programs do so at the expense of other, more qualified individuals, and that these programs are weakening professions such as our military, science, education, and healthcare. But these arguments have it exactly backwards. DEI programs were never designed to give privilege to underrepresented people. They were put in place to chip away at discrimination and nepotism, both concepts that are antithetical to meritocracy.

Keep ReadingShow less