Virginia Kase Solomón is the CEO of the League of Women Voters and serves on the boards of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, the board of directors for the Project on Government Oversight and is a member of the National Election Task Force on Election Crises.
Every August 26, we observe the anniversary of the certification of the 19th Amendment, which granted some women the right to vote in 1920. In 1973, Congress designated August 26 as “Women's Equality Day.” But this year, it feels hard to celebrate when reality tells us we are anything but equal in the United States.
The Supreme Court's decision last June in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization eliminated the constitutional right to abortion, ending a woman’s right to make healthcare decisions for herself in many states. Many were shocked, but just as many of us knew our fundamental right to bodily autonomy had been under attack for some time. For the latter, this was no surprise at all. One year later we are seeing the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision, setting progress for women back generations.
In the summer blockbuster movie Barbie, the depiction of Barbie World gives us a glimpse of a democracy where women can lead, unrestricted by bias, prejudice, and discrimination. But the real world of 2023 looks very different. As America Ferrera’s Barbie monologue reminded us, it’s impossible to be a woman.
With the current rollbacks to reproductive freedoms in a post-Dobbs world, we are living in a democracy where today’s women have fewer rights over their own bodies than the women who came before us. But that’s not the full extent of the efforts underway to exclude representation of women and their voices. We’ve seen more anti-voter laws passed in states across the country that could silence voters—especially voters of color--at the election polls in the months ahead. And women are still waiting for the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to be added to the Constitution.
The ruling in Dobbs will go down in history as one of the most impactful decisions in our nation’s history, putting abortion policies and reproductive rights in the hands of each state. So, this Women’s Equality Day, I find myself asking, will we ever really be equal? Is the dream of a Barbie world actually attainable?
The fight for women’s equality has always been grounded in the right to vote, providing women voters the right to self-determination and the right to bodily autonomy. Today our democracy is facing some of the biggest challenges in history. Women are under attack. When women have fewer rights and access, we cannot call ourselves equal. We cannot celebrate equality.
This is why the power of women voters is more critical than ever. Women voters, especially young women, possess incredible strength when we unite. In a post-Dobbs world, it is essential to channel our collective energy into organizing and mobilizing for change.
Through the ballot box, we must challenge the patriarchal policies, systems, and structures designed to exclude women. All elected officials, from local representatives to national leaders, need to be held accountable for their positions on women's rights. We must make our voices heard by voting for candidates who champion gender equality and reproductive justice is a crucial step towards ensuring progress—and protection--in a post-Dobbs world.
Throughout history, women have always been at the forefront of our nation’s biggest milestones, even if we are not always remembered in the history books. And today we continue to be a driving force for change, writing new chapters in this continued fight for equality.
Since our nation’s inception, women have moved this country forward through our collective strength and courage, and we can’t stop now. We won’t. The original fight for women’s voting rights took more than seventy years, but women never gave up.
As anti-voting bills and other hostile legislation to women’s rights sweep the nation, we must continue to build our power to ensure our democracy is representative of all people, not just a few. We build our power so we can continue to fight to ensure all voices are heard and everyone is represented in our democracy.
And how do we build that power in a post-Dobbs world and build a Barbie world of empowerment and equality? Here are three tips:
- Get Informed: Knowledge is power. Learn about the democratic landscape, policies, and how they impact women's rights. Stay informed about the ongoing legal battles related to women’s rights, including voting and reproductive justice, and take the time to educate others.
- Advocate for Change: Speak up and make your voice heard. Engage in discussions about women's rights and gender equality, both online and in-person. Participate in community forums and discussions, (including LWV’s petition to Congress), and utilize social media platforms to raise awareness about critical issues and mobilize your community.
- Support Women-Centered Organizations: Contribute your time, skills, or resources to organizations like the League of Women Voters and others, that work tirelessly for women's rights. Also, support local women's shelters, reproductive healthcare providers, and organizations that offer support to women and girls to find their voice and their power.
I said I'd give you three tips, but here's a fourth for free: VOTE. It's never too soon to make sure you have the information you need to participate in the next election. If you aren't 18 yet, encourage your older siblings and friends to register and prepare to cast their vote in EVERY election.
Barbie’s world may seem like a dream but someday it can be a reality. For that to happen, WE must fight for it now. By harnessing our collective power and striving for a Barbie world where empowered women are the norm, we can make a profound impact on our society. Together, let's write the next chapter in the ongoing struggle for gender equality and create a world where all women can live, thrive, and celebrate their rights freely.
Hey, Barbies! Let’s keep up the fight and vote.
A golden tray sits on the Resolute Desk as President Donald Trump speaks during an announcement on American nuclear innovation in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Trump is signing multiple executive orders targeting the nuclear energy sector and easing rules for new reactors and nuclear fuel supply chains.
Trump’s hubris rivals the fallen heroes of ancient Greek mythology
In January, the New York Times asked President Donald Trump if there were any limits on his global powers.
“Yeah,” the president responded, “there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”
That was eight months ago, but fortunately Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster adaptation of “The Odyssey” has made ancient Greek literature newly relevant. Before that window closes, I’d like to talk about hubris.
Today, the term mostly means excessive pride or arrogance. That’s part of what the Greeks meant by it too, but the meaning was a bit richer and more specific. Hubris was an insolent or outrageous act that offended the gods, often because the transgressor was claiming abilities or authorities that solely belonged to supreme beings.
Nolan renamed and slightly modified the concept of xenia for the film, calling it “Zeus’ law.” In the director’s telling, mortals should follow the rules laid out by the gods, specifically the requirement to treat strangers with respect lest they be gods in disguise.
In a sense, hubris is the opposite, or at least the rejection, of xenia. The hubris of the suitors, and at times Odysseus himself, invites punishment by the gods and their mortal instruments.
Which brings me back to Donald Trump. His claim that there are no constraints on his personal power to dictate events on the global stage was one of the greatest expressions of hubris ever uttered by a political leader.
Trump’s claim was obviously false when he made it.
He vowed that he could end the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours. He’s proved powerless to make that happen. If he had divine powers to work his will, why would he have balked at implementing his tariffs so often that Wall Street adopted the “TACO trade” term for his deals? “TACO” stands for “Trump always chickens out.”
And why would Trump have made so many embarrassing concessions to China — from rescinding tariffs on Chinese goods to allowing them to buy crucial and incredibly valuable computer chips?
But Trump saw his success at capturing Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro as proof of his ability to launch missiles to the same effect as Zeus’ lightning bolts. Trump believed he was the most powerful man who ever lived.
This is no exaggeration. In March, when the Iran invasion seemed successful, Trump gave a document penned by“Presidential Historian David King” to New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan purporting to prove that Trump was “the most powerful person to have EVER walked this planet.” King was, in fact, a businessman and occasional caddy for legendary golfer Gary Player.
King compared Trump favorably to many of history’s most powerful, and often heinous, figures: Alexander the Great, Attila the Hun, William the Conqueror, Napoleon Bonaparte, Joseph Stalin, Genghis Khan, Mao Tse Tung, Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Lenin. Many of these men thought they were the most powerful person in the world, too. And many were defeated precisely because they believed it.
At least Napoleon and Hitler had a string of truly impressive victories before they learned the folly of hubris. The limits on Trump’s power have been exposed by far less august forces than the combined might of the allies in World War II or the fearsome Russian winter.
Iran is a comparatively middling power. But the regime’s ability to absorb punishment while imposing its will on the Strait of Hormuz has proved to be a greater constraint on Trump’s power than his morality or mind. We should note that, at least rhetorically, his morality has not proved much of a constraint. He has repeatedly promised to destroy Iranian “civilization” if the regime refuses to capitulate.
But they haven’t — and won’t anytime soon — because the regime’s tolerance for pain far outstrips Trump’s. The combined fear of skyrocketing oil prices, outrage of Gulf state potentates, diminishing weapon supplies and domestic unpopularity is doing the work that international law, congressional oversight and the collective opinion of foreign policy experts can’t or won’t do.
If I considered Trump more heroic than reason and facts could allow, I would say his Sisyphean predicament has the whiff of Greek tragedy to it. Trump is vexed by the fact that the Iranians won’t honor deals or ratify his countless premature claims of victory — giving new meaning to his vow that his presidency would make people tired of winning. It’s almost like they’re out-Trumping Trump.
Things might have gone better if he’d heeded that great Greek tragedian Sophocles: “For Zeus utterly abhors the boasts of a proud tongue.”
____
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.