Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Rolling up our sleeves on Women’s Equality Day

A Republic, if we can keep it: Part XXIX

Women's Equality Day design
Vitalii Abakumov/Getty Images

Breslin is the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair of Political Science at Skidmore College and author of “A Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation’s Fundamental Law.”

This is the latest in “A Republic, if we can keep it,” a series to assist American citizens on the bumpy road ahead this election year. By highlighting components, principles and stories of the Constitution, Breslin hopes to remind us that the American political experiment remains, in the words of Alexander Hamilton, the “most interesting in the world.”

If I’m asked to rank the centuries based on the importance and impact of constitutional amendments, I’d be hard pressed to choose between the 18th and the 19th. The Bill of Rights, passed at the tail end of the 18th century, is certainly special. Free speech? Free press? Separation of church and state? Fundamental rights for the accused? Heady stuff, to be sure.


Still, the Civil War amendments of the 19th century are hard to beat. It’s no exaggeration to say that emancipation of enslaved Americans in the 13th Amendment, citizenship for all in the 14th, and the right to vote in the 15th drastically improved the American polity. Those amendments, more so than any other, brought the country closer to its professed aspirations.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

One thing is certain, though: the 20th century did not match the two prior in terms of the majesty of constitutional revision. Income taxes, prohibition of liquor (especially given that the amendment was eventually repealed), presidential term limits and rules for congressional compensation just don’t have the grandeur of the earlier safeguards.

Save one. The 19th Amendment, granting women the right to vote, belongs squarely on the Mount Rushmore of constitutional improvements. Aug. 26 will celebrate Women’s Equality Day, commemorating the 104th anniversary of its passage. From the Seneca Falls Convention in July 1848 through the merger of the National Woman Suffrage Association and the American Woman Suffrage Association in 1890, to the razor-thin vote by the Tennessee legislature to become the 36th and final state to ratify, the successful journey to electoral equality was arduous.

For some, unfortunately, it still is.

First, the good news. According to the Center for American Women and Politics, women tend to vote at a higher rate than men. The data is especially encouraging in presidential elections. Women also register to vote in greater numbers than men. That data doesn't change when broken down by race. Or age. Or advanced educational degree. Indeed, the broad story of women’s electoral participation in America, at least over the last half-century, is generally positive.

And yet it’s not all sunny and warm. When it comes to voting, traditional gender roles still affect turnout. Consider motherhood. According to Angela Cools, an economist at Davidson College, mothers are “3.5 percentage points less likely to vote than women without children, while men with an infant are 2.2 percentage points less likely to vote.” Further, it’s not outrageous to think that recent state-level modifications to voting regulations — including mail-in voting, absentee voting and ballot drop-off locations — might impact women more than men. Gender stereotypes still plague the pursuit of equality.

And then there’s the post-election reality. A steady increase in voting since the passage of the 19th Amendment still hasn’t translated into corresponding representation in the halls of government. At around 52 percent, women hold a slight majority in the voting-age population. Today, however, only about a quarter of congressional seats are occupied by women, while roughly a third of state lawmakers are female. Thirteen women governors lead their states. The Pew Research Center found that 79 percent of Americans suspect that women face gender discrimination in electoral politics; 81 percent believe that women candidates get less support than men from party leaders. And almost nine out of 10 Americans are convinced that “family responsibilities make it harder for women to run for office.” Access to political power requires more than just access to the voting booth.

Perhaps the most alarming, and yet hopeful, statistic is that six in 10 Americans — including 33 percent of Republicans and 76 percent of Democrats — believe that the country has “not gone far enough when it comes to giving women equal rights with men.” The will to advance seems to be there. Now we just need the energy.

Americans should be proud of the progress we’ve made on gender equality. But the journey is far from over. The 19th Amendment was — and is — transcendent. But it, like most of the amendments promising equal treatment, has yet to live up to its majestic promise.

So, as we celebrate Women’s Equality Day on August 26, we should echo Susan B. Anthony’s words: “If I could live another century!” she exclaimed. “I do so want to see the fruition of the work for women in the past century. There is so much yet to be done.”

Read More

Frankfort, Kentucky, skyline on the Kentucky River at dusk.

Invest Appalachia supports community economic development projects and businesses across the Appalachian counties of six states.

Sean Pavone/Getty Images

A new blueprint for financing community development – Part III

In Part 2 of this three-part series focused on why and how the community development finance field needs to reframe the role of capital technicians and the market, rebalance power relationships, and prioritize community voice. Today we continue that discussion.

Invest Appalachia

Invest Appalachia (IA) is another strong example of how to rebalance power between financial expertise and community voice. On the surface, IA can be described in traditional finance terms—a community investment fund similar to a CDFI that has raised $35.5 million in impact investments and nearly $3 million in grants for flexible and risk-absorbing capital. IA officially opened its doors at the end of 2022. In its first year of operation, it deployed $6.3 million in blended capital (flexible loans alongside recoverable grants) to support community economic development projects and businesses across the Appalachian counties of six states: Kentucky, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and Ohio. Another $6.5 million was deployed in the first eight months of 2024.

Keep ReadingShow less
Black woman waving from a podium
Nicholas Hunt/Office of Marketing and Communications/Prairie View A&M University via Getty Images

A revolutionary spirit of love: Remembering Nikki Giovanni

Earlier this month, we lost a voice that rang for decades with the clarity of truth and the warmth of eternal joy. Nikki Giovanni, the acclaimed poet, professor and icon of the Black Arts movement, passed away at the age of 81. The news struck me with the force of personal loss — not just because we lost a literary giant but because Giovanni's words have been a constant companion in my journey toward understanding the fullness of Black consciousness and the power of poetic expression.

As I sit with this loss, I remember how Giovanni's work exemplified what James Baldwin called "the artist's struggle for integrity." As a leading voice in the Black Arts Movement of the 1960s and '70s, her fiery and radically conscious poetry challenged social conventions while celebrating Black life's beauty and resilience. She didn't just write about revolution — she embodied it in every verse, her teaching and every dimension of her public life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Perston holding a sign that reads "Project 2025 is Christian nationalism"
Opponents of Project 2025 hold a rally at Times Square on July 27.
Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images

Religious choice vs. Christian nationalism

American voters were under a lot of stress leading up to the Nov. 5 presidential election. That stress has continued given the uncertainty as to whether many of President-elect Donald Trump’s pronouncements are just negotiating techniques or serious proposals that he will implement through executive orders upon taking office.

Angst over our Constitution also prevails. Republicans have proposed concepts that would severely impact the separation of church and state concept that’s enshrined in America’s First Amendment, wanting to make Christianity the exclusive religion in our nation. Christian nationalism has also been supported by 91 state bills and is found in the right-wing Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a 922-page blueprint for Trump to follow in his first 180 days of office.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pete Hegseth walking in a congressional hallway

Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee to be defense secretary, and his wife, Jennifer, make their way to a meetin with Sen. Ted Budd on Dec. 2.

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Hegseth is the wrong leader for women in the military, warn women veterans and lawmakers

Originally published by The 19th.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — As Pete Hegseth tries to persuade senators to support him to lead the Department of Defense in the Trump administration, several lawmakers, women veterans and military advocates warn that his confirmation could be detrimental to women in the military and reverse progress in combating sexual assault in the Armed Forces.

Keep ReadingShow less