Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Wait – the election isn’t over yet!

Louisiana election
E4C

While much of the nation is enjoying a much-deserved respite from political ads, voter drives and campaign rhetoric, election season isn’t quite finished.

Voters in Louisiana will return to the polls on Saturday for the second round of their unique election system, although with no federal or statewide races on the ballot, it has drawn little media attention outside the state.

Let’s take a closer look at Bayou State elections and other places that haven’t yet wrapped things up.


Unlike the 49 other states, Louisiana does not hold a traditional primary. Instead, all candidates appear on the ballot together on Election Day in what is often called a “jungle primary.” Any candidate who receives a majority of the vote is declared the winner. That’s what happened with Louisiana’s congressional elections this year, with a candidate earning at least 62 percent in each of the Senate and House races.

But if no one gets a majority, a second round of voting – what the secretary of state refers to as the general election – is held about a month later, featuring the two candidates with the most votes in the primary.

This system, like Georgia’s runoff or a ranked-choice election, always results in the winner having secured a majority of support. The state describes it as a majority-vote primary with a plurality-vote general election.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

(Presidential elections are handled differently, with a primary like other states.)

The runoff ballots are heavy on state legislative elections, local ballot initiatives and amendments to the state Constitution. But there is one particular race that has drawn wider attention: a battle for a seat on the Public Service Commission. That race has become a proxy for a battle of energy rates in a state that has been rocked by natural disasters.

While Louisiana is the only state where people are still voting, other jurisdictions still have some outstanding election issues.

Lawsuit looming in Arizona

A month after voting ended, Arizona’s top government officials certified the election results Monday. A number of GOP-led counties had delayed filing their results, preventing the group of Republican and Democratic officeholders from signing off.

But Kari Lake, the failed Republican candidate for governor, still insists the election was fraudulent and is expected to file a lawsuit contesting the results. She claims problems in Maricopa County make the entire election illegitimate.

The woman who defeated Lake, Democrat Katie Hobbs, is completing her term as the state’s top elections official.

“Arizona had a successful election,” Hobbs said. “But too often throughout the process, powerful voices proliferated misinformation that threatened to disenfranchise voters.”

Recount in Colorado

Rep. Lauren Boebert, one of the leading MAGA voices in the House of Representatives, faced a tougher-than-expected challenge from Democrat Adam Frisch in her reelection bid. The race was so close, in fact, the votes needed to be double-checked.

Boebert rose to prominence in 2020 as the gun-toting owner of Shooters Grill. She won her first term with 55 percent of the vote and became an outspoken defender of Donald Trump on Capitol Hill and in the media.

But as a number of Trump-backed candidates underperformed expectations in 2022, Boebert barely hung on. She led by 552 after the initial count. That result was within the 0.5 percent margin that triggers an automatic recount, even though Frisch has conceded the race.

Officials are conducting the recount this week.

Read More

People holding signs against Project 2025 and Donald Trump

Protestors rally against Project 2025 and Donald Trump in New York's Times Square.

Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images

Project 2025: How anti-trans proposals could impact all families

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

Willie Carver has been a teacher in Kentucky since 2007, now working with college students. For over two years, he has worked with the American Federation of Teachers’ National LGBTQ+ Task Force, an advocacy arm of the influential labor union created to counter the rise and repression brought by anti-LGBTQ+ laws.

One of the country’s most draconian anti-trans measures became law in Carver’s home state last March. The law has required teachers to put politics before the wellbeing of their own students and reshaped how students see and treat each other. It bans them from being taught about gender identity or sexual orientation, using restrooms and locker rooms that match their gender identity and learning about human sexuality. The law also made gender-affirming care illegal for trans youth.

Keep ReadingShow less
Perston holding a sign that reads "Project 2025 is Christian nationalism"

Opponents of Project 2025 hold a rally at Times Square on July 27.

Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images

Project 2025: A blueprint for Christian nationalist regime change

Casey is a former editorial writer for The New York Times and has worked with the Kettering Foundation since 2010.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross-partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 is a “presidential transition project” created as a blueprint for recruitment and indoctrination should Donald Trump become the next president. The plan calls for establishing a government that would be imbued with “biblical principles” and run by a president who holds sweeping executive powers.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump at a podium

Former President Donald Trump's campaign exploits racist dog whistles, demonizing immigrants and endorsing white nationalist rhetoric, writes Johnson.

Adam J. Dewey/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Contending with whiteness in 2024

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

The 2024 presidential campaign is shaping to be a racial reckoning for America.

With Vice President Kamala Harris positioned to shatter the glass ceiling as the first woman and person of color in the Oval Office and Donald Trump's candidacy fanning the flames of racial hatred, the election is laying bare the nation's ongoing struggle with whiteness and racial justice. As a pastor and advocate for racial reconciliation, I believe this moment will test our democracy's commitment to liberty and justice for all.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kamala Harris and Donald Trump

Kamala Harris and Donald Trump

Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu, Andrew Leyden/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Where Harris, Trump stand on issues is less important than you think

Anderson edited "Leveraging: A Political, Economic and Societal Framework," has taught at five universities and ran for the Democratic nomination for a Maryland congressional seat in 2016.

Candidates for president of the United States typically run for office as though they were running for prime minister in a parliamentary democracy where their own party would have a clear majority in parliament. In such systems, which make up the vast majority of democracies in the world, the prime minister has enormous power to set policy.

In the United States, you would think that presidents are prime ministers because they always talk about what "I" will do as president based on where "I" stand on a great range of issues. While the president admittedly has much more power to set foreign policy, all major domestic policies must be passed by Congress. Indeed, Congress makes laws, while the president and the Cabinet execute them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Young man looking angry at display of his smartphone.

The inflammatory rhetoric, meaningless speculation and lack of fact checking by the media may result in young adults rejecting traditional platforms in favor of their well-being.

urbazon/Getty Images

By focusing on outrage, the media risks alienating younger audiences

Rikleen is executive director of Lawyers Defending American Democracy and the editor of “Her Honor – Stories of Challenge and Triumph from Women Judges.” Beougher is a junior at Amherst College and a co-founder ofStudents Strengthening American Democracy.

As attacks on democracy and the rule of law continually increase, much of the media refuses to address its role in intensifying the peril.

Instead of asking hard questions and insisting on answers, traditional media outlets increasingly trade news and facts for speculative commentary that ignores a story’s contextual significance. At the same time, social media outlets and influencers stoke anger as an alternative to thoughtfulness.

Keep ReadingShow less