Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Activism in Free Press

News

Activism in Free Press
The vital link between a healthy press and our republic
Getty Images

“Media and technology are essential to our democracy” is the first statement that appears on Free Press’ website, a suitable introduction to an organization dedicated to reshaping the media landscape. Founded in 2003, Free Press was established to empower people to have a voice in the powerful decisions that shape how media and technology operate in society. Over the years, the media industry has undergone dramatic shifts, with corporate consolidation swallowing up local TV stations, radio outlets, and newspapers. This has led to a decline in independent journalism, resulting in the loss of numerous jobs for reporters, editors, and producers across the country.

Due to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, a piece of legislation that allows anyone to enter the communications business, it was up to Free Press to closely monitor decisions shaping the media landscape when people’s right to connect and communicate is in danger.


Vanessa Maria Graber, a director of journalism and media education, leads the News Voices project, which connects local communities and the newsrooms that serve them through public engagement, advocacy campaigns, and collaborative projects.

Graber was able to work with Free Press on issues related to net neutrality, broadband access, and campaigns surrounding the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Through the media justice movement, Free Press can focus on protecting free speech, press freedom, fighting hate and misinformation, and holding media and tech companies accountable. The media justice movement is based on the understanding of the intersectionalities between federal policy work and the influence of corporate media on journalism. It aims to challenge power structures and ensure the media reflects the needs of all communities.

With Graber, Free Press has worked on various projects, including Democracy Is.

They will be holding various series of briefings and training sessions for media professionals and communities to protect democracy. One of the most recent discussions focused on the recent elections and understanding how free and fair elections are supposed to work, as well as disinformation surrounding elections and its potential to undermine democracy.

Through educating the public and media professionals, Free Press emphasizes the crucial role media literacy plays in combating disinformation and gaining a better understanding of how technology affects our perception of content. Vulnerable communities are often the most targeted when it comes to disinformation. That’s why the educational work Free Press does can help people recognize what’s real and what’s not. One of their recent polls showed that Spanish speakers in the U.S. are even more likely to feel like they don’t have enough independent news sources to make informed decisions when it comes to voting.

According to Free Press’ analysis, daily Spanish speakers are more likely to receive news article links compared to other U.S adults.

It highlights why Free Press has been calling on social media platforms to take more action to prevent the spread of misinformation, particularly in languages such as Spanish.

They hold media institutions accountable by overseeing telecommunications in the United States and by collaborating with the FCC and FTC. They can monitor all policies and individuals who may potentially pose a risk to the public. Additionally, Free Press can shape regulations that are favorable to the public.

“ A very small number of people own the majority of media in this country and until that changes, we're still going to have a very unbalanced system where majority of people do not have power and access to equitable media, and that's why we have been for the last 20 years fighting for more access to media platforms and to create our media and for smaller groups of people who are not giant media corporations” Graber said.

Through research, advocacy, and activism, Free Press also hosts a media power collaborative that people can join to learn more about journalism policy and media justice issues.

One of their major wins was restoring funds to the New Jersey Civic Information Consortium, which Governor Murphy had proposed cutting to zero. With Free Press launching a campaign in New Jersey to advocate for the funds not to be cut and to be restored, they were able to secure their restoration for $2.5 million.

Graber is currently working on the future of a journalism team that is collaborating on a research project with a dozen newsrooms from across the country, which produce civic journalism, and is trying to understand how people are meeting the information needs of their communities. They will explore the types of innovations and engagement they have had or attempted to achieve.

This report will be published in the fall with the results of that research. In addition, the Free Press’ journalism team is working to pass legislation in states such as California, Illinois, Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania to provide funding for local journalism projects, including those in New Jersey, through the Civic Information Bill.

Whether it’s privacy, surveillance, misinformation, or the future of local journalism, Free Press continues to fight for a media system that truly reflects and serves the people. Through activism, education, and policy work, they’re creating a space where everyone can have a voice in the media and in our democracy.

Nathaly Suquinagua is a bilingual multimedia journalist with a B.A. in Journalism and a minor in Dance from Temple University and a cohort member with the Fulcrum Fellowship.

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. To learn about the many NextGen initiatives we are leading, click HERE.

Please help the Fulcrum in its mission of nurturing the next generation of journalists by donating HERE!

Read More

A gavel next to a computer chip with the words "AI" on it.

Often, AI policy debates focus on speculative risks rather than real-world impacts. Kevin Frazier argues that lawmakers and academics must shift their focus from sci-fi scenarios to practical challenges.

Getty Images, Just_Super

Why Academic Debates About AI Mislead Lawmakers—and the Public

Picture this: A congressional hearing on “AI policy” makes the evening news. A senator gravely asks whether artificial intelligence might one day “wake up” and take over the world. Cameras flash. Headlines declare: “Lawmakers Confront the Coming Robot Threat.” Meanwhile, outside the Beltway on main streets across the country, everyday Americans worry about whether AI tools will replace them on factory floors, in call centers, or even in classrooms. Those bread-and-butter concerns—job displacement, worker retraining, and community instability—deserve placement at the top of the agenda for policymakers. Yet legislatures too often get distracted, following academic debates that may intrigue scholars but fail to address the challenges that most directly affect people’s lives.

That misalignment is no coincidence. Academic discourse does not merely fill journals; it actively shapes the policy agenda and popular conceptions of AI. Too many scholars dwell on speculative, even trivial, hypotheticals. They debate whether large language models should be treated as co-authors on scientific papers or whether AI could ever develop consciousness. These conversations filter into the media, morph into lawmaker talking points, and eventually dominate legislative hearings. The result is a political environment where sci-fi scenarios crowd out the issues most relevant to ordinary people—like how to safeguard workers, encourage innovation, and ensure fairness in critical industries. When lawmakers turn to scholars for guidance, they often encounter lofty speculation rather than clear-eyed analysis of how AI is already reshaping specific sectors.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person looking at social media app icons on a phone
A different take on social media and democracy
Matt Cardy/Getty Images

Outrage Over Accuracy: What the Los Angeles Protests Teach About Democracy Online

In Los Angeles this summer, immigration raids sparked days of street protests and a heavy government response — including curfews and the deployment of National Guard troops. But alongside the demonstrations came another, quieter battle: the fight over truth. Old protest videos resurfaced online as if they were new, AI-generated clips blurred the line between fact and fiction, and conspiracy theories about “paid actors” flooded social media feeds.

What played out in Los Angeles was not unique. It is the same dynamic Maria Ressa warned about when she accepted the Nobel Peace Prize in 2021. She described disinformation as an “invisible atomic bomb” — a destabilizing force that, like the bomb of 1945, demands new rules and institutions to contain its damage. After Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the world created the United Nations and a framework of international treaties to prevent nuclear catastrophe. Ressa argues that democracy faces a similar moment now: just as we built global safeguards for atomic power, we must now create a digital rule of law to safeguard the information systems that shape civic life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth's Assault on Journalism
tóng-àn:The Pentagon, cropped square.png – Wikipedia

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth's Assault on Journalism

The Trump Administration is ramping up its ongoing effort to curtail press freedom. While much attention has been paid to ABC’s cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel Live! under pressure from Trump’s media enforcer, Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendon Carr, the Pentagon has announced draconian new restrictions on the press.

Last week, as the Boston Globe noted, it said “credentialed journalists at the military headquarters” will be required to sign a pledge to refrain from reporting information that has not been authorized for release….Journalists who don’t abide by the policy risk losing credentials that provide access to the Pentagon.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Censorship in Prime Time: Is The Authoritarian Playbook in Motion?
Fayl:Jimmy Kimmel June 2022.jpg - Vikipediya

Censorship in Prime Time: Is The Authoritarian Playbook in Motion?

ABC’s decision to pull Jimmy Kimmel Live! indefinitely has sent shockwaves through both the media and political worlds, with critics denouncing the move as censorship. “This isn’t right,” wrote actor Ben Stiller. California Governor Gavin Newsom went further, accusing the Republican Party of “censoring you in real time,” warning that “buying and controlling media platforms, firing commentators, canceling shows… it’s coordinated. And it’s dangerous.”

This isn’t just about one late-night host. It’s about a pattern—a six-step playbook used by authoritarian regimes to dismantle democratic institutions. And under President Donald Trump’s second term, critics say that playbook is being executed with alarming precision.

Keep ReadingShow less