Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Activism in Free Press

News

Activism in Free Press
The vital link between a healthy press and our republic
Getty Images

“Media and technology are essential to our democracy” is the first statement that appears on Free Press’ website, a suitable introduction to an organization dedicated to reshaping the media landscape. Founded in 2003, Free Press was established to empower people to have a voice in the powerful decisions that shape how media and technology operate in society. Over the years, the media industry has undergone dramatic shifts, with corporate consolidation swallowing up local TV stations, radio outlets, and newspapers. This has led to a decline in independent journalism, resulting in the loss of numerous jobs for reporters, editors, and producers across the country.

Due to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, a piece of legislation that allows anyone to enter the communications business, it was up to Free Press to closely monitor decisions shaping the media landscape when people’s right to connect and communicate is in danger.


Vanessa Maria Graber, a director of journalism and media education, leads the News Voices project, which connects local communities and the newsrooms that serve them through public engagement, advocacy campaigns, and collaborative projects.

Graber was able to work with Free Press on issues related to net neutrality, broadband access, and campaigns surrounding the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Through the media justice movement, Free Press can focus on protecting free speech, press freedom, fighting hate and misinformation, and holding media and tech companies accountable. The media justice movement is based on the understanding of the intersectionalities between federal policy work and the influence of corporate media on journalism. It aims to challenge power structures and ensure the media reflects the needs of all communities.

With Graber, Free Press has worked on various projects, including Democracy Is.

They will be holding various series of briefings and training sessions for media professionals and communities to protect democracy. One of the most recent discussions focused on the recent elections and understanding how free and fair elections are supposed to work, as well as disinformation surrounding elections and its potential to undermine democracy.

Through educating the public and media professionals, Free Press emphasizes the crucial role media literacy plays in combating disinformation and gaining a better understanding of how technology affects our perception of content. Vulnerable communities are often the most targeted when it comes to disinformation. That’s why the educational work Free Press does can help people recognize what’s real and what’s not. One of their recent polls showed that Spanish speakers in the U.S. are even more likely to feel like they don’t have enough independent news sources to make informed decisions when it comes to voting.

According to Free Press’ analysis, daily Spanish speakers are more likely to receive news article links compared to other U.S adults.

It highlights why Free Press has been calling on social media platforms to take more action to prevent the spread of misinformation, particularly in languages such as Spanish.

They hold media institutions accountable by overseeing telecommunications in the United States and by collaborating with the FCC and FTC. They can monitor all policies and individuals who may potentially pose a risk to the public. Additionally, Free Press can shape regulations that are favorable to the public.

“ A very small number of people own the majority of media in this country and until that changes, we're still going to have a very unbalanced system where majority of people do not have power and access to equitable media, and that's why we have been for the last 20 years fighting for more access to media platforms and to create our media and for smaller groups of people who are not giant media corporations” Graber said.

Through research, advocacy, and activism, Free Press also hosts a media power collaborative that people can join to learn more about journalism policy and media justice issues.

One of their major wins was restoring funds to the New Jersey Civic Information Consortium, which Governor Murphy had proposed cutting to zero. With Free Press launching a campaign in New Jersey to advocate for the funds not to be cut and to be restored, they were able to secure their restoration for $2.5 million.

Graber is currently working on the future of a journalism team that is collaborating on a research project with a dozen newsrooms from across the country, which produce civic journalism, and is trying to understand how people are meeting the information needs of their communities. They will explore the types of innovations and engagement they have had or attempted to achieve.

This report will be published in the fall with the results of that research. In addition, the Free Press’ journalism team is working to pass legislation in states such as California, Illinois, Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania to provide funding for local journalism projects, including those in New Jersey, through the Civic Information Bill.

Whether it’s privacy, surveillance, misinformation, or the future of local journalism, Free Press continues to fight for a media system that truly reflects and serves the people. Through activism, education, and policy work, they’re creating a space where everyone can have a voice in the media and in our democracy.

Nathaly Suquinagua is a bilingual multimedia journalist with a B.A. in Journalism and a minor in Dance from Temple University and a cohort member with the Fulcrum Fellowship.

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. To learn about the many NextGen initiatives we are leading, click HERE.

Please help the Fulcrum in its mission of nurturing the next generation of journalists by donating HERE!


Read More

Meta Undermining Trust but Verify through Paid Links
Facebook launches voting resource tool
Facebook launches voting resource tool

Meta Undermining Trust but Verify through Paid Links

Facebook is testing limits on shared external links, which would become a paid feature through their Meta Verified program, which costs $14.99 per month.

This change solidifies that verification badges are now meaningless signifiers. Yet it wasn’t always so; the verified internet was built to support participation and trust. Beginning with Twitter’s verification program launched in 2009, a checkmark next to a username indicated that an account had been verified to represent a notable person or official account for a business. We could believe that an elected official or a brand name was who they said they were online. When Twitter Blue, and later X Premium, began to support paid blue checkmarks in November of 2022, the visual identification of verification became deceptive. Think Fake Eli Lilly accounts posting about free insulin and impersonation accounts for Elon Musk himself.

This week’s move by Meta echoes changes at Twitter/X, despite the significant evidence that it leaves information quality and user experience in a worse place than before. Despite what Facebook says, all this tells anyone is that you paid.

Keep ReadingShow less
artificial intelligence

Rather than blame AI for young Americans struggling to find work, we need to build: build new educational institutions, new retraining and upskilling programs, and, most importantly, new firms.

Surasak Suwanmake/Getty Images

Blame AI or Build With AI? Only One Approach Creates Jobs

We’re failing young Americans. Many of them are struggling to find work. Unemployment among 16- to 24-year-olds topped 10.5% in August. Even among those who do find a job, many of them are settling for lower-paying roles. More than 50% of college grads are underemployed. To make matters worse, the path forward to a more stable, lucrative career is seemingly up in the air. High school grads in their twenties find jobs at nearly the same rate as those with four-year degrees.

We have two options: blame or build. The first involves blaming AI, as if this new technology is entirely to blame for the current economic malaise facing Gen Z. This course of action involves slowing or even stopping AI adoption. For example, there’s so-called robot taxes. The thinking goes that by placing financial penalties on firms that lean into AI, there will be more roles left to Gen Z and workers in general. Then there’s the idea of banning or limiting the use of AI in hiring and firing decisions. Applicants who have struggled to find work suggest that increased use of AI may be partially at fault. Others have called for providing workers with a greater say in whether and to what extent their firm uses AI. This may help firms find ways to integrate AI in a way that augments workers rather than replace them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Parv Mehta Is Leading the Fight Against AI Misinformation

A visual representation of deep fake and disinformation concepts, featuring various related keywords in green on a dark background, symbolizing the spread of false information and the impact of artificial intelligence.

Getty Images

Parv Mehta Is Leading the Fight Against AI Misinformation

At a moment when the country is grappling with the civic consequences of rapidly advancing technology, Parv Mehta stands out as one of the most forward‑thinking young leaders of his generation. Recognized as one of the 500 Gen Zers named to the 2025 Carnegie Young Leaders for Civic Preparedness cohort, Mehta represents the kind of grounded, community‑rooted innovator the program was designed to elevate.

A high school student from Washington state, Parv has emerged as a leading youth voice on the dangers of artificial intelligence and deepfakes. He recognized early that his generation would inherit a world where misinformation spreads faster than truth—and where young people are often the most vulnerable targets. Motivated by years of computer science classes and a growing awareness of AI’s risks, he launched a project to educate students across Washington about deepfake technology, media literacy, and digital safety.

Keep ReadingShow less
child holding smartphone

As Australia bans social media for kids under 16, U.S. parents face a harder truth: online safety isn’t an individual choice; it’s a collective responsibility.

Getty Images/Keiko Iwabuchi

Parents Must Quit Infighting to Keep Kids Safe Online

Last week, Australia’s social media ban for children under age 16 officially took effect. It remains to be seen how this law will shape families' behavior; however, it’s at least a stand against the tech takeover of childhood. Here in the U.S., however, we're in a different boat — a consensus on what's best for kids feels much harder to come by among both lawmakers and parents.

In order to make true progress on this issue, we must resist the fallacy of parental individualism – that what you choose for your own child is up to you alone. That it’s a personal, or family, decision to allow smartphones, or certain apps, or social media. But it’s not a personal decision. The choice you make for your family and your kids affects them and their friends, their friends' siblings, their classmates, and so on. If there is no general consensus around parenting decisions when it comes to tech, all kids are affected.

Keep ReadingShow less