Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Why Trump assassination attempt theories show lies never end

Donald Trump on stage at the Republican National Convention

Former President Donald Trump speaks at the 2024 Republican National Convention on July 18.

J. Conrad Williams Jr.

By: Michele Weldon: Weldon is an author, journalist, emerita faculty in journalism at Northwestern University and senior leader with The OpEd Project. Her latest book is “ The Time We Have: Essays on Pandemic Living.”

Diamonds are forever, or at least that was the title of the 1971 James Bond movie and an even earlier 1947 advertising campaign for DeBeers jewelry. Tattoos, belief systems, truth and relationships are also supposed to last forever — that is, until they are removed, disproven, ended or disintegrate.

Lately we have questioned whether Covid really will last forever and, with it, the parallel pandemic of misinformation it spawned. The new rash of conspiracy theories and unproven proclamations about the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump signals that the plague of lies may last forever, too.


Summer ushers in a Covid surge of the new variant that is unfolding in the U.S. and abroad with emergency room visits up 23 percent, and a 13 percent increase in hospitalizations in this country, the Centers for Disease Control reports. Infections are increasing in 39 states or territories and declining in none. The World Health Organization reports more than 1,000 deaths from Covid in this country in June.

Even though the WHO declared in May 2023 that Covid was no longer a public health concern, the notion that this disease will forever pose a threat lingers. There have been more than 7 million deaths worldwide from Covid to date, and more deaths every day.

The lies surrounding Covid, vaccinations and treatments also still persist, calling into question most every source of news and timely announcements. Covid for many marked the end of innocence for those who believed in the reliability and credibility of news sources.

Reality is freshly challenged as a new Washington Post poll shows that nearly 30 Republican congressional members blame President Joe Biden, the Secret Service, Democrats or the media for Trump's shooting. None of these projections are substantiated.

The infinite future for the Covid pandemic signals a tale of two countries divided into those who are careful with masking and vaxxing due to correct health information and safe practices, and those who defy prevention and treatment because they are part of a political scheme of control and encroachment on their civil rights. The division is once again prominent with the way the Trump rally shooting is interpreted and explained — without factual backup.

Fortunately, last month the Supreme Court denied the lawsuit challenging the government’s right to restrict social media platforms from disseminating Covid-19 misinformation. The lawsuit was in reaction to Surgeon General Vivek Murthy seeking to stem the tide of inaccurate vaccine information that could cost thousands of lives.

The prevailing falsehoods about Covid are not just bothersome or inconvenient, they change behaviors that result in the spread of infections, hospitalizations and deaths. Playing what one expert calls “Covid roulette” with risky behaviors based on false information can result in more cases. Untruths are a matter of life and death.

Politifact has fact-checked more than 2,300 claims about Covid vaccines, including the Instagram post in January that claimed 17 million people died from vaccines. Not true.

A recent Brown University study of “50 papers published between Jan. 1, 2020, and Feb. 24, 2023, that investigated the efficacy of 119 misinformation interventions,” found that actions to counter inaccuracies around Covid and publications are urgently needed.

“Public health practitioners, journalists, community organizations and other trusted messengers are tasked with responding to health misinformation every day,” said co-author Stefanie Friedhoff, an associate professor at Brown’s School of Public Health and co-director of the Information Futures Lab.

Whether or not people believe Covid infections will last another year, decade or century, it is critical to guarantee that reliable, factual information about Covid is available and that misformation is debunked as swiftly as possible.

A March 2024 Gallup News poll shows “ 59% of Americans believe the pandemic is over.” More than half, or “57%, report that their lives have not returned to normal, and 43% expect they never will.”

Yes, Covid is on the rise and hopefully new vaccine variants can keep the spread under control and prevent deaths. The vaccine for disinformation of any and all sorts is a commitment to what is real and a vigorous rejection of false narratives. Debunking the latest untrue assertions can also prevent deaths from possible political violence.

As a nation, we can and must handle the truth.


Read More

An aerial view of a Flock camera

An aerial view of a Flock camera in Burbank, California. U.S. President Donald Trump expressed support for Flock cameras, saying he likes the AI-powered surveillance technology because of its use by law enforcement, despite concerns that it infringes on privacy.

(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Flock Cameras Are Coming Down – but We Need More To Dismantle the Surveillance State

Chances are, you’ve seen one in your neighborhood. Flock cameras have become a major flashpoint for voters in the leadup to the midterms. The concept sounds straight out of 1984 — a network of government-owned cameras that track your movements — it’s no wonder that Americans across party lines are demanding their states and towns sever ties with the controversial company. Surveillance fears are only getting stronger as we enter the AI era.

But the problem isn’t just Flock. These cameras, Automated License Plate Readers or ALPRs to be exact, are a symptom of a larger “surveil first, ask questions later” attitude that has been adopted by local and federal government for decades. In recent years, the federal government has been dramatically expanding the nation’s surveillance infrastructure. This has taken many forms, from facial recognition technology at the airport, to law enforcement monitoring your mail, to the government watching what you’re posting on your personal social media pages. Since April, many Democrats and Republicans in Congress have united to stop what would effectively be a blank check for surveillance via FISA reauthorization, demanding surveillance reforms such as closing the “data broker loophole”, which allows the government to buy Americans’ personal data without a warrant.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Young adult woman accessing artificial intelligence

Young adult woman accessing artificial intelligence, managing digital information, and exploring future technology within an office setting

Getty Images

When One Person Can Do the Work of a Team

The harder question is how many capable people organizations will need. My latest lesson about artificial intelligence did not come from a research report or technology conference. It came from running the Security and Sustainability Forum.

Until recently, I depended heavily on an assistant to manage much of the website and webinar production process. Now I can do many of those tasks myself with Claude and ChatGPT. They help me develop content, revise web pages, solve technical problems, and manage projects that once required considerably more human support.

Keep ReadingShow less
photograph shows a handheld smartphone displaying the icons of some of the main artificial intelligence based apps

This photograph shows a handheld smartphone displaying the icons of some of the main artificial intelligence based apps, including LLMs, chatbots and generative AI, with logos (from L) of Proton AG's Lumo, Meta AI, Mistral Vibe (formerly Le Chat), xAI's Grok, Microsoft's Copilot, Google's Gemini, Anthropic's Claude, Perplexity, Deepseek, OpenAI's Chat GPT, Google's Notebook LLM and generative AI music app Suno, in Saint-Mande, east of Paris, on July 15, 2026.

Photo by Martin LELIEVRE / AFP via Getty Images)

The Second AI Election: Testing the Safeguards Before November

The 2024 U.S. presidential election was supposed to be the “first AI election.” Experts warned that generative AI could flood voters with deepfakes and fabricated evidence of fraud, U.S. intelligence officials declassified intel reports on foreign influence operations already experimenting with the technology, and leading AI companies pledged to combat deceptive election content. But foreign nations faced significant barriers to deploying AI to influence that election, according to the now-shuttered U.S. Foreign Malign Influence Center.

Two years later, the picture looks very different. AI tools have become far more sophisticated and widely available. Russia, China, and Iran are deploying a wide variety of cutting-edge AI tools in more sophisticated ways in foreign influence operations aimed at the United States and its citizens, among others. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has itself used AI in misleading ways, while at the same time dismantling or defunding the federal and independent bodies that identified and countered election-related influence campaigns. With the potential for AI-driven misinformation campaigns to escalate sharply in this year’s midterms, we tested some of the most popular AI models to learn how they can be exploited to peddle false election narratives. The results are clear: AI companies, lawmakers, and civil society must do more to blunt the threat ahead of elections this November and in 2028 to help ensure free and fair elections. We outline the steps they can take to do so below.

Keep ReadingShow less
Robot Holding a Resume Doing HR Work Vector Illustration

AI résumé screening can filter out qualified candidates before a human ever looks. Here's why transparency and human oversight in hiring matter.

nicoletaionescu/Getty Images

When AI Screens the Resume, Who Gets a Fair Shot at Work?

A job seeker can spend hours tailoring a résumé, checking qualifications and writing a thoughtful application, believing the next step will be a person deciding whether to schedule an interview.

Increasingly, that assumption may be wrong.

Keep ReadingShow less