Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Mississippi stands firm against mail voting, but will allow for mail delays

Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson

Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson

Mississippi secretary of state

Correction: The story was updated July 20 to correct several errors in the original version.

Despite new tweaks at the margins of election law, Mississippi looks to remain near the top of the list of places where it will be most difficult to vote this year.

Just ask the top election official, Secretary of State Michael Watson. A Republican like almost everyone in power in the state, he had asked lawmakers in Jackson to allow all Mississippians to vote early and in person because of the coronavirus pandemic.

The Legislature rebuffed his modest proposal, which would have done nothing to ease the rules for voting by mail, instead passing a bill making the state's already strict excuse requirements even more exacting.


The measure, signed last week by Gov. Tate Reeves, adds being under "physician-imposed quarantine" for Covid-19 or "caring for a dependent" with the disease to the list of acceptable reasons for casting an absentee ballot in person before Nov. 3.

The altered law does not make those allowable excuses for voting by mail, which remains an option only for people who must be far from their polling place because of work or school, plus the disabled and those older than 65. Those restrictions meant only one of every 15 votes was cast that way in the 2018 midterm.

"The Legislature narrowed it down further than the former law that we had," Watson lamented to the Clarion-Ledger.

The new law made one change that voting rights activists are praising, and which makes the state stand out from most others. Until now, Mississippi has only tabulated mail ballots that arrived by the day before Election Day, one of the nation's most restrictive deadlines. From now on, they'll be counted if they arrive five days after the polls close so long as they're postmarked before the polls close, joining a roster of just 10 states that allow votes to arrive that late or later.

In a recent Millsaps College poll, 54 percent of the state's voters backed an immediate switch to no-excuse absentee voting so the electorate could "safely vote by mail this November" — the system available everywhere this fall except Mississippi and 15 other states.

Watson opposed that. Instead, he hoped to persuade lawmakers to do what 39 states will do this November and allow in-person voting for several days ahead of Election Day by anyone who's registered — but only during emergencies such as the Covid-19 outbreak.

That did not happen, either. The secretary of state is now asking state Attorney General Lynn Fitch to decide just how permissive the pandemic exception for early voting should be — especially if the surge of coronavirus cases, which has not hit Mississippi as hard as most other states in the Deep South this month, causes a widespread need to stay at home this fall.

In a separate measure, the Legislature also granted the secretary of state's request to provide a $50 "hazard pay" bonus to poll workers as a way to encourage more people to take the state's 10,000 or more jobs, which have been tougher to fill than ever because people have no interest in that much exposure to strangers during the pandemic.

A "totally inadequate response," was the summary of the new laws from Democratic state Sen. David Blount, who pushed many of the more expansive changes and said he might try again before the Legislature's special session ends. "There's virtually no significant changes to conducting an election in a pandemic."

The state's six electoral votes are secure for President Trump, who carried the state last time by 18 points. The last Democrat to do so was Jimmy Carter in 1976. But Democrats think a turnout surge, especially in Black-majority counties, would give former Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy a prayer in his rematch against GOP Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith.

Voters will also be asked to approve a design to replace the last state flag in the country to bear the emblem of the confederacy.


Read More

A woman sitting down and speaking with a group of people.

Research shows Americans see political opponents as more extreme than reality. Learn how closing this 'perception gap' can restore civil discourse.

Getty Images, Luis Alvarez

Closing Perception Gaps Strengthens the Whole Democracy Ecosystem

Perception gaps — misunderstandings about our fellow Americans across the political spectrum — are damaging the fabric of our country. Correcting these gaps is essential to preserving the kind of democracy that respects free speech, individual dignity, and civic responsibility.

At their core, perception gaps reflect a tendency to see those in the other party as more extreme and worse than they actually are. Too often, Americans assume their political opponents are more hostile, closed-minded, dishonest, or even supportive of political violence and rule-breaking than in reality. These caricatures drive fear and division.

Keep ReadingShow less
The sky clears behind the U.S. Capitol after rainy weather

The sky clears behind the U.S. Capitol after rainy weather on Sept. 2, 2026, in Washington, D.C.

Finn Gomez / Getty Images

We Didn't Get This Angry Because Americans Changed: We Got This Angry Because Washington Did

Something unusual has happened on the opinion pages of The New York Times recently.

Three very different writers have described three seemingly different American problems.

Keep ReadingShow less
Vote pins

Vote pins

Photo provided

Sharp Gender Divide Among Latino Voters

A new analysis from the UCLA Latino Policy and Politics Institute (LPPI) and the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies (IGS) reveals significant political differences between Latinas and Latino men in California — especially among younger voters and those without bachelor’s degrees. The findings, drawn from the May 2026 Berkeley IGS Poll of 1,912 Latino registered voters, challenge the notion that California’s Latino electorate behaves as a single political bloc.

California Latinas are more likely than Latino men to prioritize protecting immigrant communities, opposing the Trump administration’s agenda, and defending democracy and voting rights. According to the report, 69% of Latinas say protecting immigrant communities is “very important,” compared with 52% of Latino men. On “fighting the Trump agenda,” the gap is identical: 68% of Latinas versus 51% of Latino men. Democracy and voting rights receive the strongest support across both groups, with 87% of Latinas and 77% of Latino men rating the issue as very important.

Keep ReadingShow less
unrecognizable businessman giving speech to professional audience

Brain science explains why voters reward charisma over results — and why the leaders who "fix" the most get credit for the least. A behavioral look at elections.

alvaro gonzalez/Getty Images

The Résumé Should Outvote the Smile

There's an old joke about a couple who finally solved years of arguing over decisions. "Since you're the man of the house," the wife said, "you handle the big things -- our stance on foreign wars, who we send to the Senate. I'll take care of the small stuff: groceries, the mortgage, where we live, what we eat." The husband agreed happily, certain he had won the better half of the deal. A few years later he realized the trade had gone entirely the other way. He held forth on geopolitics at dinner parties while his wife quietly ran every detail that actually touched his life: what he ate, where he lived, how his money was spent. What looked like ultimate authority was, in practice, near-total abdication over the things that shaped his days.

Voters make the same trade, and pay for it the same way. We keep hiring leaders for the qualities we would want in a spouse -- warmth, charm, a commanding voice, the sense that they see us -- instead of the qualities we would want in a mechanic: someone who can find what is broken and fix it before the whole system fails. We evaluate candidates the way we choose intimate partners, not the way we hire people to run complex, high-stakes systems.

Keep ReadingShow less