Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Mississippi stands firm against mail voting, but will allow for mail delays

Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson

Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson

Mississippi secretary of state

Correction: The story was updated July 20 to correct several errors in the original version.

Despite new tweaks at the margins of election law, Mississippi looks to remain near the top of the list of places where it will be most difficult to vote this year.

Just ask the top election official, Secretary of State Michael Watson. A Republican like almost everyone in power in the state, he had asked lawmakers in Jackson to allow all Mississippians to vote early and in person because of the coronavirus pandemic.

The Legislature rebuffed his modest proposal, which would have done nothing to ease the rules for voting by mail, instead passing a bill making the state's already strict excuse requirements even more exacting.


The measure, signed last week by Gov. Tate Reeves, adds being under "physician-imposed quarantine" for Covid-19 or "caring for a dependent" with the disease to the list of acceptable reasons for casting an absentee ballot in person before Nov. 3.

The altered law does not make those allowable excuses for voting by mail, which remains an option only for people who must be far from their polling place because of work or school, plus the disabled and those older than 65. Those restrictions meant only one of every 15 votes was cast that way in the 2018 midterm.

"The Legislature narrowed it down further than the former law that we had," Watson lamented to the Clarion-Ledger.

The new law made one change that voting rights activists are praising, and which makes the state stand out from most others. Until now, Mississippi has only tabulated mail ballots that arrived by the day before Election Day, one of the nation's most restrictive deadlines. From now on, they'll be counted if they arrive five days after the polls close so long as they're postmarked before the polls close, joining a roster of just 10 states that allow votes to arrive that late or later.

In a recent Millsaps College poll, 54 percent of the state's voters backed an immediate switch to no-excuse absentee voting so the electorate could "safely vote by mail this November" — the system available everywhere this fall except Mississippi and 15 other states.

Watson opposed that. Instead, he hoped to persuade lawmakers to do what 39 states will do this November and allow in-person voting for several days ahead of Election Day by anyone who's registered — but only during emergencies such as the Covid-19 outbreak.

That did not happen, either. The secretary of state is now asking state Attorney General Lynn Fitch to decide just how permissive the pandemic exception for early voting should be — especially if the surge of coronavirus cases, which has not hit Mississippi as hard as most other states in the Deep South this month, causes a widespread need to stay at home this fall.

In a separate measure, the Legislature also granted the secretary of state's request to provide a $50 "hazard pay" bonus to poll workers as a way to encourage more people to take the state's 10,000 or more jobs, which have been tougher to fill than ever because people have no interest in that much exposure to strangers during the pandemic.

A "totally inadequate response," was the summary of the new laws from Democratic state Sen. David Blount, who pushed many of the more expansive changes and said he might try again before the Legislature's special session ends. "There's virtually no significant changes to conducting an election in a pandemic."

The state's six electoral votes are secure for President Trump, who carried the state last time by 18 points. The last Democrat to do so was Jimmy Carter in 1976. But Democrats think a turnout surge, especially in Black-majority counties, would give former Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy a prayer in his rematch against GOP Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith.

Voters will also be asked to approve a design to replace the last state flag in the country to bear the emblem of the confederacy.


Read More

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: The SAVE Act and the Future of Voter ID Rules
A close up of a window with a sticker on it
Photo by Zach Wear on Unsplash

Just the Facts: The SAVE Act and the Future of Voter ID Rules

Last week, I wrote a column in the Fulcrum entitled “Just the Facts: Voter ID, States’ Powers, and Federal Limits.” The facts presented in that writing made it clear that the U.S. Constitution does not require voter ID and left almost all election administration—including voter qualifications—to the states. However, over time, constitutional amendments and federal statutes have restricted states’ ability to impose discriminatory voting rules, but they have never mandated voter ID.

The SAVE America Act

The national debate over voter ID has entered a new phase with the introduction of the SAVE America Act, the most sweeping federal voter‑identification and citizenship‑documentation proposal in modern history. For more than two centuries, voter eligibility rules—ID included—have been primarily a matter of state authority, bounded by constitutional protections against discrimination. The SAVE America Act would shift that balance by imposing federal requirements for both photo identification and documentary proof of citizenship in federal elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
Posters are displayed next to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) as he speaks at a news conference to unveil the Take It Down Act to protect victims against non-consensual intimate image abuse, on Capitol Hill on June 18, 2024 in Washington, DC.

A lawsuit against xAI over AI-generated deepfakes targeting teenage girls exposes a growing crisis in schools. As laws struggle to keep up, this story explores AI accountability, teen safety, and what educators and parents must do now.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

Deepfakes: The New Face of Cyberbullying and Why Parents, Schools, and Lawmakers Must Act

As a former teacher who worked in a high school when Snapchat was born, I witnessed the birth of sexting and its impact on teens. I recall asking a parent whether he was checking his daughter’s phone for inappropriate messages. His response was, “sometimes you just don’t want to know.” But the federal lawsuit filed last week against Elon Musk's xAI has put a national spotlight on AI-generated deepfakes and the teenage girls they target. Parents and teachers can’t ignore the crisis inside our schools.

AI Companies Built the Tool. The Grok Lawsuit Says They Own the Damage.

Whether the theory of French prosecutors–that Elon Musk deliberately allowed the sexualized image controversy to grow so that it would drive up activity on the platform and boost the company’s valuation–is true or not, when a company makes the decision to build a tool and knows that it can be weaponized but chooses to release it anyway, they are making a risk-based decision believing that they can act without consequence. The Grok lawsuit could make these types of business decisions much more costly.

Keep ReadingShow less