Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Missouri lawmakers come up with complex rules for mail voting during Covid

Missouri Gov. Mike Parson

The bill to expand mail-in-voting options for Missourians amid the coronavirus pandemic is now awaiting Republican Gov. Mike Parson's signature.

Jacob Moscovitch/Getty Images

Missouri lawmakers have come up with a complex loosening of the rules for voting absentee in light of the coronavirus crisis.

Gov. Mike Parson has not said outright that he will sign the measure, cleared by his fellow Republicans in charge of the General Assembly just before their session ended Friday night. But if he does, the number of states that have kept their strict excuse requirements intact during the pandemic will be down to just four.

The measure would allow people at high risk of Covid-19 infection to obtain a vote-from-home ballot for the rest of the year. It would allow all other Missourians to vote that way as well, but only if their ballots included the electronic or physical signature of a notary.


Currently, the very small list of available excuses for not voting in person include being ill, diabled, out of town or facing a religious restriction to travel on Election Day.

The legislation would expand that roster to include anyone who has tested positive for the coronavirus or is "at-risk" of infection because they're older than 65, immunocompromised, live in a long-term care facility, or have lung, heart, liver or kidney disease.

Others could vote absentee without any of these excuses so long as their ballots are notarized. And that is now easier than in most states, because in April Parson signed an executive order allowing notaries to conduct business over video chat and sign documents electronically.

The governor has previously opposed expanding vote-by-mail options, but in a recent press briefing said the state needed to consider an exemption during the pandemic.

The bill applies only to voting in the June 2 municipal elections, the Aug. 4 congressional and state office primaries, and the Nov. 3 general election.

If the governor signs the new rules, Missouri will join South Carolina as the two most recent states to relax their vote by mail excuse rules — but it will still remain one of the toughest places for voting during the pandemic.

The other states where the excuse rules have not yet been changed — Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee and Connecticut — are all facing lawsuits to force a relaxation this year. Missouri legislators acted in the face of such a suit from the NAACP and the League of Women Voters, which are arguing in state court that the desire to shelter in place is a valid excuse to vote absentee.


Read More

People at voting booths.

A clear breakdown of voter ID laws under the Constitution, federal statutes, and court rulings—plus analysis of new Trump administration proposals to impose nationwide voter identification requirements.

Getty Images, LPETTET

Just the Facts: Voter ID, States’ Powers, and Federal Limits

The Fulcrum approaches news stories with an open mind and skepticism, presenting our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.


Few issues generate more heat and are less understood than voter ID.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person signing a piece of paper with other people around them.

Javon Jackson, center, was able to register to vote following passage of a 2019 Nevada law that restored voting rights to formerly incarcerated individuals.

The Nation Is Missing Millions of Voters Due to Lack of Rights for Former Felons

If you gathered every American with a prison record into one contiguous territory and admitted it to the union, you would create the 12th-largest state. It would be home to at least 7 million to 8 million people and hold a dozen votes in the Electoral College.

In a close presidential race, this hypothetical state of the formerly incarcerated could decide who wins the White House.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

An analysis of Trump’s SAVE Act strategy, the voter ID debate, and how Pew data is being misused—exploring election integrity, voter suppression, and the political fight shaping U.S. democracy.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Stop Fighting Voter ID. Start Defining It.

President Trump doesn't need the SAVE America Act to pass. He only needs the debate to continue. Every minute spent arguing about voter suppression repeats the underlying premise — that noncitizen voting is a real and widespread problem — until it feels like an established fact. The question is whether Democrats will contest Republicans’ definition before the frame hardens.

Trump's claim that 88% of Americans support the bill traces to a Pew Research Center survey — a survey that found 83% support a “government-issued photo ID to vote,” not extreme vetting for proof of citizenship. That support included 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats, indicating genuine, broad, bipartisan support for a basic civic principle. That's worth taking seriously.

Keep ReadingShow less
People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less