Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Virus a valid excuse to vote absentee in Missouri, lawsuit argues

Missouri Gov. Mike Parson

Missouri Gov. Mike Parson does not think the coronavirus pandemic is a valid reason for people to vote absentee. Advocates have filed a lawsuit arguing that it is.

John Moscovitch/Getty Images

The coronavirus pandemic is a valid reason for Missourians to vote using mail-in absentee ballots, according to a lawsuit filed by the NAACP and the League of Women voters.

The suit, filed Friday, is the latest instance of voting rights advocates asking elected officials or courts for waivers or favorable interpretations of state laws limiting the circumstances for voting absentee. Missouri is one of 16 states that require an explicit "excuse" for obtaining a mail-in ballot.


The lawsuit argues that a provision of Missouri law, permitting absentee voting by those incapacitated or confined because of illness or disability, could easily be interpreted to include people who fear leaving their homes during the pubic health emergency. Five states, the lawsuit notes, have already interpreted similar statutes that way.

But officials in different parts of Missouri are divided on the question, and Republican Gov. Mike Parson opposes the idea.

Parson, who is favored in a competitive race for re-election, has already postponed all municipal elections from April to June 2. Primaries still set for Aug. 4 will decide nominees for governor and other statewide offices, eight U.S. House seats and most seats in the General Assembly

The suit says the absentee voting regulations violate the Missouri Constitution. It also asks a state court judge to eliminate the usual requirement for many absentee ballots to be notarized.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In addition to the illness and disability exception, the state permits absentee voting for those who will be away from home, have a religious conflict, are poll workers or are in jail on Election Day.

Read More

A better direction for democracy reform

Denver election judge Eric Cobb carefully looks over ballots as counting continued on Nov. 6. Voters in Colorado rejected a ranked choice voting and open primaries measure.

Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

A better direction for democracy reform

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

This is the conclusion of a two-part, post-election series addressing the questions of what happened, why, what does it mean and what did we learn? Read part one.

I think there is a better direction for reform than the ranked choice voting and open primary proposals that were defeated on Election Day: combining fusion voting for single-winner elections with party-list proportional representation for multi-winner elections. This straightforward solution addresses the core problems voters care about: lack of choices, gerrymandering, lack of competition, etc., with a single transformative sweep.

Keep ReadingShow less
To-party doom loop
Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America

Let’s make sense of the election results

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author of "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

Well, here are some of my takeaways from Election Day, and some other thoughts.

1. The two-party doom loop keeps getting doomier and loopier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting in Denver

A proposal to institute ranked choice voting in Colorado was rejected by voters.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

Despite setbacks, ranked choice voting will continue to grow

Mantell is director of communications for FairVote.

More than 3 million people across the nation voted for better elections through ranked choice voting on Election Day, as of current returns. Ranked choice voting is poised to win majority support in all five cities where it was on the ballot, most notably with an overwhelming win in Washington, D.C. – 73 percent to 27 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Electoral College map

It's possible Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could each get 269 electoral votes this year.

Electoral College rules are a problem. A worst-case tie may be ahead.

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization. Keyssar is a Matthew W. Stirling Jr. professor of history and social policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. His work focuses on voting rights, electoral and political institutions, and the evolution of democracies.

It’s the worst-case presidential election scenario — a 269–269 tie in the Electoral College. In our hyper-competitive political era, such a scenario, though still unlikely, is becoming increasingly plausible, and we need to grapple with its implications.

Recent swing-state polling suggests a slight advantage for Kamala Harris in the Rust Belt, while Donald Trump leads in the Sun Belt. If the final results mirror these trends, Harris wins with 270 electoral votes. But should Trump take the single elector from Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district — won by Joe Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2016 — then both candidates would be deadlocked at 269.

Keep ReadingShow less