Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Lawsuit targets restrictive voting laws in Mississippi

Mississippi voting

Mississippi is facing a lawsuit challenging its restrictive law governing who can vote by mail and who must go to the polls, like this 2018 voter in Ridgeland.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

A lawsuit filed Thursday in federal court challenges the requirements governing voting by absentee ballot in Mississippi — among the most restrictive of any state.

The suit takes issue with the rule that people have an excuse in order to vote by mail, that absentee ballots must be notarized, and that the state has no provision for notifying people if an absentee ballot has been rejected so voters can fix the problem.

Mississippi is one of just seven states that requires an excuse for people to receive an absentee ballot for the November election, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. A majority of states already have "no excuse" absentee voting and several more are making an exception for the 2020 general election because of the coronavirus pandemic.


The Lawyer's Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and the Southern Poverty Law Center, among others, filed the lawsuit on behalf of the League of Women Voters Mississippi, the Mississippi State Conference of the NAACP and three voters. The defendants are Secretary of State Michael Watson and Attorney General Lynn Fitch.

The plaintiffs are asking that the requirements for absentee ballots be ruled unconstitutionally strict and that preliminary and permanent injunctions be granted to block them in advance of the November election.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

"Mississippi has some of the most restrictive burdens on absentee voting in the nation that run afoul of the Constitution and have a particularly stark impact on Black voters," said Jennifer Nwachukwu, counsel at the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.

Legislation signed this summer by Gov. Tate Reeves adds being under "physician-imposed quarantine" for Covid-19 or "caring for a dependent" with the disease as valid reasons for allowing people to cast an early in-person absentee ballot.

But the law does not make those excuses allowable for voting by mail.

The legislation passed this summer did make one change praised by voting rights activists. Previously, absentee ballots had to arrive at the election offices by Election Day in order to be valid.

Now, absentee ballots will be counted if they arrive within five days after the polls close and are postmarked by Election Day.

Read More

Kamala Harris waiving as she exits an airplane

Kamala Harris waiving as she exits an airplane

Anadolu/Getty Images

GOP attacks against Kamala Harris were already bad – they are about to get worse

Farnsworth is a Professor of Political Science and International Affairs and Director of the Center for Leadership and Media Studies at the University of Mary Washington

Public opinion polls suggest that U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris is doing slightly better than Joe Biden was against Donald Trump, but Republican attacks against her are only now ramping up.

Keep ReadingShow less
Candace Asher

Singer/songwriter Candace Asher

Presenting 'This Country Tis of Thee'

As we approach another presidential election, less than 120 days away, uncivil, dysfunctional behaviors continue to divide the nation. Each side blaming the other is never going to unite us.

As the rancor and divide between Americans increases, we need to stop focusing on our differences. The Fulcrum underscores the imperative that we find the common bonds of our humanity — those can, do and must bind us together.

There are many examples in the American Songbook that brought folks together in previous times of great strife and discord, including “Imagine,” “Heal the World,” “Love Can Build a Bridge,” “The Great Divide” and, of course, “We Are the World.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has put us on a path to ruin, writes Jamison.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Preventing the decline and fall of the American republic

Jamison is a retired attorney.

The Supreme Court has jettisoned the time-honored principle that no one is above the law. In its recent ruling in Trump v. United States, the court determined that a president of the United States who solicits and receives from a wealthy indicted financier a bribe of $500 million in return for a pardon cannot be criminally prosecuted for bribery. The pardon power, command of the armed forces, and apparently “overseeing international diplomacy” are, according to the court, “core” powers of the president which can be exercised in violation of the criminal laws without fear of criminal liability.

This is a fire alarm ringing in the night. Here’s why.

Keep ReadingShow less