Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

How Latino Families Are Redefining Bilingual Learning in America

Opinion

How Latino Families Are Redefining Bilingual Learning in America

Bilingual education

Getty Images

For decades, American classrooms have been haunted by a myth. It goes by many names — “the word gap,” “the language gap,” “early vocabulary deficit” — but the idea is simple: children from non-English-speaking or low-income homes hear fewer words before kindergarten and therefore start school already at a disadvantage. That assumption has shaped how millions of children are seen before they ever set foot in a classroom.

In my own home, that idea would have sounded foreign. My mother, an educator who has spent her life promoting bilingual learning in Brazil, taught me early on that “every new language we learn multiplies the brain’s synapses and opens up unimaginable doors.” Years later, after moving to the U.S. as an international college student, I encountered the opposite message in schools — that bilingualism hinders learning instead of expanding it.


That belief gained traction in the 1990s, fueled by research that claimed children from professional families hear thirty million more words than those from working-class homes by age three. Among the most cited was the 1995 study by researchers Betty Hart and Todd Risley, which came to define what educators now call the “language gap.”.

The theory sounded scientific. It appeared in policy reports, teacher training, and public campaigns for decades. Yet, as scholars Teresa McCarty and Sheilah Nicholas argue in Unseen WEIRD Assumptions, it rests on a narrow worldview: one that measures intelligence through the lens of WEIRD societies: Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic. It privileges certain ways of talking and questioning while overlooking the richness of multilingual communication that defines millions of Latino households.

A Gap Built on the Wrong Assumptions

The “language gap” idea — the belief that some children enter school at a linguistic disadvantage — shaped U.S. education policy for decades. It traces back to the 1995 Hart and Risley study, which claimed that by age three, children from professional families heard 30 million more words than those from working-class households.

But as Teresa McCarty and Sheilah Nicholas argue in Unseen WEIRD Assumptions, that research only studied English-speaking, middle-class families. It equated intelligence with one cultural style of talk: constant child-directed speech and questioning. For many Latino households, communication takes on other forms — such as storytelling, songs, prayer, and communal conversation — that pass on knowledge in different yet equally rich ways. To call those practices “deficient” misunderstands what learning sounds like outside the WEIRD world.

How the Myth Shapes Classrooms

Despite growing criticism, traces of the “language gap” still echo in classrooms. Bilingual children are often labeled “behind” for not mastering English quickly enough. Teachers sometimes urge parents to “speak only English at home,” though research shows bilingualism actually boosts literacy. And standardized tests continue to measure understanding through English vocabulary rather than concept or reasoning.

These assumptions send a clear message: that a child’s home language — and by extension, identity — doesn’t belong in school. The result is lower expectations, misplaced remediation, and families pressured to choose between belonging and self-expression.

Communities Leading the Change

Across the country, Latino educators and families are rejecting deficit thinking and proving that bilingualism is an advantage, not a limitation.

Dual-Language Immersion.

From Los Angeles to Houston to Salt Lake City, dual-language schools are experiencing rapid growth. Students learn in both English and Spanish, alternating languages by subject or week. Studies show that these students match or surpass their peers in reading and cognitive skills by middle school. Utah’s statewide program now reaches over 40,000 students — one of the largest in the nation.

Parent Empowerment

Programs like Abriendo Puertas and Padres Comprometidos train Latino parents to advocate for their children while celebrating cultural identity. Instead of discouraging Spanish at home, they promote bilingual storytelling and conversation as tools for learning. Evaluations of Padres Comprometidos found that participating families became more confident in supporting their children’s learning and more likely to engage in bilingual activities at home.

Translanguaging Classrooms.

In schools from New York to New Mexico, teachers invite students to use all their languages to think and create — brainstorming in Spanish, writing in English, discussing in Spanglish. In border communities like El Paso, Texas, teachers have embraced translanguaging as a strength. ‘We stopped punishing kids for being bilingual,’ one teacher said, ‘and they started thriving.’

Why It Matters for the Country

Nearly 12 million K-12 students in the U.S. speak a language other than English at home. That’s not a challenge to fix — it’s a national resource. Bilingual workers strengthen education, health care, and business; bilingual thinkers bridge cultures and communities. Yet education policy still prioritizes English-only outcomes, even where most students are multilingual.

The persistence of the “language gap” reflects something deeper: an American discomfort with linguistic diversity that mirrors larger tensions about race, identity, and belonging.

Listening, Not Measuring

If Unseen WEIRD Assumptions teaches anything, it’s that language is never neutral — it reveals whose voices society values. For too long, success has been measured through monolingual norms, blaming those who don’t fit.

But the solution is already visible. When a mother sings a lullaby in Spanish, when a child mixes languages to explain a science project, when teachers invite stories in students’ own words — those aren’t deficits. They’re the sound of learning in motion.

To close the so-called language gap, America doesn’t need more word counts or remediation programs. It needs recognition: bilingualism isn’t an obstacle to overcome but a form of brilliance to cultivate.

Maria Eduarda Grill is a student from Brazil studying Global Affairs and Economics at the University of Notre Dame. She is a fellow with Common Ground Journalism and a researcher with the Kellogg Institute, where she studies digital governance and media freedom in Latin America.

The Fulcrum's Executive Editor, Hugo Balta is an instructor with Commmon Ground Journalism. He is an accredited solutions journalism and complicating the narratives trainer.


Read More

Latino Voter Landscape Shifts as Economic Pressures Reshape Support for Both Parties

Your Vote Counts postid

Latino Voter Landscape Shifts as Economic Pressures Reshape Support for Both Parties

New polling and expert analysis reveal a shifting and increasingly complex political landscape among Hispanic and Latino voters in the United States. While recent surveys show that economic pressures continue to dominate voter concerns, they also highlight a broader fragmentation of political identity that is reshaping long‑standing assumptions about Latino electoral behavior. A Pew Research Center poll indicates that President Donald Trump has lost support among Hispanic voters, with 70% disapproving of his performance, even though 42% of Latinos voted for him in 2024, a ten‑point increase from 2020. Among those who supported him, approval remains relatively high at 81%, though this marks a decline from earlier polling.

At the same time, Democrats are confronting their own challenges. Data comparing the 2024 American Electorate Voter Poll with the 2020 American Election Eve Poll show that Democratic margins dropped by 23 points among Latino men, raising concerns among party strategists about weakening support heading into the 2026 midterms. Analysts argue that despite these declines, sustained investment in Latino voter engagement remains essential, particularly as turnout efforts have historically influenced electoral outcomes.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Disconsent of the Governed

The U.S. Capitol is shown on February 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The Disconsent of the Governed

President Trump’s administration and Congress have not paid much attention to what legislators call “the normal order” in matters related to codifying laws and implementing programs and policies that are supposed to help mind the public’s business or satisfy petitioners looking for attention and relief. This has been partly by design and partly not.

A serious consequence of our leaders not following “normal order” has been to encourage many of us who aren’t in government to use more polarizing rhetoric and to act out more than usual. While there may be little we would consider “normal” about how our national government has been working recently or how people have risen to support or challenge it, we would be mistaken and doing ourselves a great disservice if we were to dismiss or condemn the agitated steps everyday Americans are taking as unhinged or “the work of domestic terrorists.” Their words and actions may be on the other side of normal, but there’s nothing crazy about them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Compassion and Common Sense Must Coexist in Immigration Policy
Changing Conversations Around Immigration
Leif Christoph Gottwald on Unsplash

Compassion and Common Sense Must Coexist in Immigration Policy

I am writing this not as a Democrat or a Republican, but as an American who believes that compassion and common sense must coexist. I understand why many people feel sympathy for those who come to the United States seeking safety or opportunity. That compassion is part of who we are as a nation. But compassion alone cannot guide national policy, especially when the consequences affect every citizen, every community, and every generation that follows.

For more than two centuries, people from around the world have entered this country through a legal process—sometimes long, sometimes difficult, but always rooted in the idea that a nation has the right and responsibility to know who is entering its borders. That principle is not new, and it is not partisan. It is simply how a functioning country protects its people and maintains order.

Keep ReadingShow less
SCOTUS Tariffs Case: Representative Government vs Authoritarianism.
scotus rulings voting rights, disclosure
scotus rulings voting rights, disclosure

SCOTUS Tariffs Case: Representative Government vs Authoritarianism.

The Supreme Court Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (Tariffs) and consolidated related cases relate to the following issues:

(1) Whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) authorizes the tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump; and

Keep ReadingShow less