Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Florida open primaries campaign turns to Magic

Magic Johnson endorsed the All Voters Vote campaign in Florida.

NBA legend Magic Johnson, who just watched his Los Angeles Lakers defeat the Miami Heat in the league finals, has thrown his considerable star power behind the campaign to open most primaries in Florida to all voters, regardless of party.

The referendum on this fall's ballot in the nation's biggest purple state is being watched by many good-government groups as closely as any contest for office, because they view open primaries as one of the best ways to depolarize the nation's politics.

Although he ended his playing career 24 years ago, Johnson has remained one of basketball's most visible and charismatic ambassadors. And his endorsement follows on the heels of increased player activism that has led to dozens of sports arenas and stadiums being used as voting locations this fall.


"Amendment 3 will ensure that politicians listen to everyone. Join me in supporting Amendment 3 and let all voters vote," Johnson says in a 30-second endorsement video unveiled Tuesday. "It's simple, it's common sense and it's, well, it's magic."

Under the proposal, starting in 2024 the state would have "top two" open primaries in elections for governor, lieutenant governor, the Legislature and other state-level positions. All voters, regardless of party affiliation, would be able to vote in the primary, and the two candidates with the most votes — again, regardless of party — would advance to the general election. (Johnson lives in California, which uses a similar system for congressional and state primaries.)

The switch would allow almost 3.7 million unaffiliated Floridians — nearly 30 percent of the state's electorate — to participate at a crucial juncture in the electoral process.

Both the Republican and Democratic parties are fighting the amendment, which requires 60 percent support to pass. While proponents believe it would lead to more moderate candidates advancing to general elections, opponents argue it would create chaos and shut out minority viewpoints.

In fact, Republican Chris Sprowls, the next state House speaker, and Democratic Sen. Janet Cruz held a joint press conference Tuesday to support a lawsuit filed Tuesday that asks the Florida Supreme Court to toss the amendment — even though nearly 2 million ballots have already been cast.

"This can do irreparable damage to our political process. This is the political equivalent to a battle royal. Nobody understands who's going to be left out, nobody understands the damage that is going to be done to the process and who's going to be disenfranchised, which is why it shouldn't go into the constitution," Sprowls said at the press conference, according to the Orlando Sentinel.

Open Primaries, a national nonprofit that is supporting similar campaigns for open primaries in Alaska and St. Louis — welcomed Johnson's endorsement.

"Open primaries is pretty basic — we believe every voter should be able to vote in every publicly funded election. The partisan opponents of Amendment 3 in Florida make all kinds of false claims that if you let everyone vote, all hell breaks loose," said the group's president, John Opdycke. "Magic Johnson's endorsement is significant not simply because of who he is, but because of what he says. 'It's simple. It's fair. It's magic.' Democracy is indeed magic. When you create the space for everyone to participate, new conversations, new coalitions, new outcomes become possible."


Read More

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

A woman sifts through the rubble in her house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026, in Tehran, Iran.

(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

This question is not an exercise in double-talk. It is critical to understand the power that our Constitution grants exclusively to Congress, and the power that resides in the President as Commander-in-Chief of the military.

The Constitution clearly states that Congress has the power to declare war. The President does not have that power. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 recognizes that distribution of power by saying that a President can only introduce military force into an existing or imminent hostility if Congress has declared war or specifically authorized the President to use military force, or there is a national emergency created by an attack on the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less
Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs
person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs

Healthcare and social assistance professions added 693,000 jobs in 2025. Without those gains, the U.S. economy would have lost roughly 570,000 jobs.

At first glance, these numbers suggest that healthcare is a growth engine in an otherwise slowing labor market. But a closer look reveals something more troubling for patients and healthcare professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large group of people is depicted while invisible systems actively scan and analyze individuals within the crowd

Anthropic’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over a Pentagon “supply-chain risk” label raises major constitutional questions about AI policy, corporate speech, and political retaliation.

Getty Images, Flavio Coelho

Anthropic Sues Trump Over ‘Unlawful’ AI Retaliation

Anthropic’s dispute with the Trump administration is no longer just about AI policy; it has escalated into a constitutional test of whether American companies can uphold their values against political retaliation. After the administration labeled Anthropic a “supply‑chain risk”, a designation historically reserved for foreign adversaries, and ordered federal agencies to cease using its technology, the company did not yield. Instead, Anthropic filed two lawsuits: one in the Northern District of California and another in the D.C. Circuit, each challenging different aspects of the government’s actions and calling them “unprecedented and unlawful.”

The Pentagon has now formally issued the supply‑chain risk designation, triggering immediate cancellations of federal contracts and jeopardizing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in near‑term revenue. Anthropic’s filings describe the losses as “unrecoverable,” with reputational damage compounding the financial harm. Yet even as the government blacklists the company, the Pentagon continues using Claude in classified systems because the model is deeply embedded in wartime workflows. This contradiction underscores the political nature of the designation: a tool deemed too “dangerous” to be used by federal agencies is simultaneously indispensable in active military operations.

Keep ReadingShow less