Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The Fahey Q&A with Kate Titus, finding creative ways to get a reform on Oregon's ballot

Kate Titus of Common Cause Oregon
Kate Titus

After organizing the Voters Not Politicians 2018 ballot initiative that put citizens in charge of drawing Michigan's legislative maps, Fahey became founding executive director of The People, which is forming statewide networks to promote government accountability. She interviews a colleague in the world of democracy reform each month for our Opinion section.


Kate Titus is executive director of Common Cause Oregon, whose goal is to make the political process fair, transparent and more democratic. She is currently helping to lead People Not Politicians Oregon, a coalition circulating petitions to get an initiative on the November ballot that would create an independent commission to draw boundaries for the Legislature and congressional districts.

Our recent conversation has been edited for clarity and brevity.

Fahey: You're approaching a big deadline. What needs to happen for the redistricting initiative to have a chance to be successful?

Titus: We need 149,360 signatures to get our proposal on the ballot, so as Oregonians we need to step up. Registered voters need to find a petition and print, sign and mail it to us by June 26 — the end of next week. They can also email us to request a petition be mailed to their address. It can make all the difference if folks who support this get two or three others to sign with them. We've got a great opportunity to make the democratic process more democratic. The process for drawing district lines has been rigged because legislators have an inherent conflict of interest. We know there's a better way.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Fahey: Tell us a little about your background.

Titus: I've been organizing ever since I can remember, but I started working with Common Cause about eight years ago. I grew up in the 1960s and '70s and witnessed civil rights movements that made me understand that it's on us to create change. The leadership of people who leaned in and made great progress inspired me to advocate for voting rights today. It was, and continues to be, a huge challenge. We've come a long way but have much work ahead. There are still ways in which organized forces try to suppress some faction of the vote.

Fahey: Tell me more about what People Not Politicians Oregon is advocating for.

Titus: Our coalition is good governance organizations and others from all across the political spectrum. We seek to change redistricting and put it into the hands of an independent commission with clear guidelines and transparency. It would include four Democrats, four Republican and four registered voters unaffiliated with either major party.

Fahey: Share a bit about Oregon's history with gerrymandering.

Titus: Most people don't know we've had a problematic history with redistricting. It only happens every 10 years, so a lot of people aren't old enough to know what happened in the 1950s, let alone the 1910s. The Legislature, for about five decades, didn't adjust districts at all, as they're supposed to, so votes had unequal weight. The courts forced the state to start redistricting again in the latter half of the 1900s — but it was contentious, and each time it was challenged and ended up going to the secretary of state or the courts. Even with the best intentions, whichever party is in control views things through a lens of maintaining power, not of representing the interests of the people.

Fahey: What would be the positive impacts of this initiative?

Titus: Once we do pass this, we'll have a more transparent process where districts are more reflective and responsive. Most Oregonians vote for one party or another, but those are not the only interests we care about. We may also share interests based on racial, geographic or other factors. People of color, women and young people are all significantly underrepresented in state office. There's no perfect way to draw lines, but an independent and community-driven process is better than one driven by political parties and legislators, who have conflicts of interest.

Fahey: How has Covid-19 impacted your ability to get the proposal on the ballot?

Titus: It's harder to get signatures, because we can't go door to door. There are no busy gatherings with lots of people, and we can't sign up people with clipboards face-to-face. We've mailed out the signature petitions to over a million voters. And we're using email, social media and remote person-to-person methods of contact to get the word out.

Fahey: How have community members in Oregon become involved?

Titus: A team of Common Cause volunteers is working remotely: calling, emailing and texting to spread the word. Other organizations are organizing volunteers spreading the word through social media and their personal networks. And volunteers in Salem can go into an office and process thousands of petitions coming in daily — while socially distanced.

Fahey: What can people do to help?

Titus: It's an enormous task that will take Oregonians stepping up to succeed. We have a letter to the editor tool on our website. Spreading awareness through social networks and taking the time to sign the petition are great ways to help.

Fahey: What has been your most gratifying moment in this campaign?

Titus: Seeing people step up in the middle of a major health crisis. We have volunteers checking in daily on Zoom to compare notes. They feel how hard it is to gather signatures one by one — but when you look at the tens of thousands of signatures combined, it makes a difference.

Fahey: If you were speaking with a high school student or new immigrant, how would you describe what being an American means to you?

Titus: We're all part of many communities — families, neighborhoods, geographic areas. But we're also part of an experiment in democracy. We have yet to realize the full promise of American democracy. We have yet to see Americans obtain full and equal rights. But as an American, I get to be part of that experiment, and you do too.

Read More

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

Someone filling out a ballot.

Getty Images / Hill Street Studios

Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

In the 2024 U.S. election, several states did not pass ballot initiatives to implement Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) despite strong majority support from voters under 65. Still, RCV was defended in Alaska, passed by a landslide in Washington, D.C., and has earned majority support in 31 straight pro-RCV city ballot measures. Still, some critics of RCV argue that it does not enhance and promote democratic principles as much as forms of proportional representation (PR), as commonly used throughout Europe and Latin America.

However, in the U.S. many people have not heard of PR. The question under consideration is whether implementing RCV serves as a stepping stone to PR by building public understanding and support for reforms that move away from winner-take-all systems. Utilizing a nationally representative sample of respondents (N=1000) on the 2022 Cooperative Election Survey (CES), results show that individuals who favor RCV often also know about and back PR. When comparing other types of electoral reforms, RCV uniquely transfers into support for PR, in ways that support for nonpartisan redistricting and the national popular vote do not. These findings can inspire efforts that demonstrate how RCV may facilitate the adoption of PR in the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less