Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Shaping leaders for a unified governance

Shaping leaders for a unified governance
Millenial Action Project

Pamela Goldsmith is the Senior Communications Director at the Millennial Action Project.

In a convergence of young state lawmakers from across the country, Future Summit 2023, hosted by Millennial Action Project (MAP), galvanized nearly 70 promising young legislators, transcending partisan divisions to coalesce around a common goal — to shape the future of governance. Representing the expansive Millennial and Gen Z lawmaker community within MAP’s State Future Caucus Network (SFCN) — spanning 35 states, these emerging leaders gathered in Indianapolis, Indiana on the IUPUI campus for a transformative four-day event.


Empowering Leaders

In an era marked by political polarization and complex challenges, the annual Summit plays a pivotal role in collectively shaping the trajectory of policymaking for young legislators. Providing a vital platform for relevant discussions and collaborative endeavors, its impact extends far beyond its four-day duration, empowering this group of lawmakers to transcend party affiliations and focus on common ground.

Shared Vision Across Party Lines

During the recent Summit, Colorado state Rep. Jennifer Bacon, a Democrat, highlighted invaluable lessons she gained in recognizing the potential for bipartisanship amidst differing perspectives across party lines. She said her three-year journey in the legislature unveiled pivotal progress achieved in partnering with her conservative counterparts. Bacon says her approach has been a continuous effort to bridge divides. Recognizing the complexities inherent in addressing sensitive issues like qualified immunity for law enforcement, she opted to humanize herself and the experiences of her community saying, “I recognized the value of building camaraderie and relationships, and extended the courtesy of inviting colleagues to visit our district and also visited their districts in order to foster a deeper understanding.” She shared her elation at having the support of Sen. Byron Pelton, a Republican, and his Senate colleague, who co-sponsored a bill concerning offender eligibility for release from confinement — that successfully passed in June 2023. This legislation helped pilot a program aimed at cultivating skills for incarcerated individuals. Bacon says that the process of initiating important conversations and amplifying the voices of her constituents via committee discussions and testimonies proved effective, providing a gateway to continuing bipartisan conversations. She noted, they are almost there on many fronts —each significant step taken representing an inspiring move toward a more united political landscape.

It was precisely that spirit of finding commonality that propelled Arkansas Sen. Breanne Davis, a Republican, and Rep. Jamie Scott, a Democrat, to collaborate on a state bill they reflected on at the event. Their combined efforts culminated in the successful championing and passage of the CROWN Act, a crucial stride toward eradicating hair-based discrimination. The genesis of their partnership can be traced back to getting to know one another through a Future Caucus meeting, a testament to the Summit’s core ethos of fostering bipartisan connections. Moreover, the Arkansas Future Caucus declared the passage of 39 bipartisan bills enacted in 2023, all of which were sponsored by Gen Z and millennial members. They attribute this achievement to the concerted efforts of state legislators uniting to find common solutions, despite differing perspectives.

Welcoming lawmakers on day one, Millennial Action Project President and CEO Layla Zaidane reminded attendees, “Future Caucus offers an opportunity to untie your hands and not only reinforce belief in yourself, but to build trust with somebody new. Because when we work together, small actions lead to big changes in ways we never could imagine.”

Key Policy Issues: Small Actions, Big Results

Focusing on the essence of ‘Small Actions, Big Results,’ Future Summit set its sights on addressing an array of pressing policy matters, resonating with both millennials and the wider population. Energy and the environment, affordable housing, criminal justice reform, challenges and opportunities presented by AI technologies, and viable approaches to addressing complex societal issues were central topics under discussion. Policy areas reflected the ever-growing urgency for action on issues directly impacting the future of our society. Lawmakers engaged in constructive dialogue and identified common ground while sharing and generating ideas for bipartisan policy solutions.

Session Speakers

One of the Summit’s key sessions underscored the importance of leadership development and bridging differences through interactive exercises and case study discussions, guiding lawmakers in navigating political differences to increase cross-partisan policy making. Dr. Ted Johnson, Senior Advisor for New America's flagship US@250 initiative, Dr. Rachel Kleinfeld, Sr. Fellow, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Rep. Casey Toof, of Vermont and Holly Wise, Manager of Solutions Journalism Network, led conversations on strengthening civic engagement and cultivating a more inclusive and representative political system.

Relevant exchange of views by other featured speakers and expert insights examined strategies to enhance transparency, safeguard voting rights, and empower marginalized communities in the decision-making process. Speakers encouraged participants to think beyond party lines, collaborate with those holding differing viewpoints and envision a collective future that transcends ideological divisions.

Future Caucus member, Kansas state Rep. Tory Blew, a Republican, said her Summit conversations with lawmakers centered on concerns over fuel tax and affordable housing across states. Commenting on the impact of widespread polarization in the state legislature, Blew said, “Oftentimes there is a commonality and agreement on different policies we’d like to see implemented on both sides; it’s just that the avenues in getting there are different.”

Additional speakers included Stan Wilcox, Executive Vice President of Regulatory Affairs at the NCAA, discussing strategies that facilitate constructive dialogue in a polarized political landscape; and state Rep. Dawson Holle (R-ND), the youngest elected lawmaker in the history of North Dakota at age 19. Securing his seat in the state’s 2022 election and shepherding several bills to passage over the past year, Holle took part in a panel exploring the drive behind increased participation of younger generations in the political process and the implications of their involvement. He discussed the importance of listening to constituents and understanding their needs.

In a session centered on cultivating brand identity, positioning, and storytelling, Julie Jensen, Founder & CEO of Jasper Advisors, imparted her insights and personal narratives drawn from her tenure at the helm of the Washington Football Team’s communications and public affairs functions during the team’s rebrand.

Transforming the Future of Governance

The hallmark of Future Summit and the Future Caucus Network is exemplified in its ability to bridge partisan gaps and unite young legislators from across the broad political spectrum committed to driving progress.

Zadaine believes the Future Caucus network is poised to reshape the trajectory of governance one policy at a time, saying, “Events like Future Summit are an important reminder that any one legislator who is doing the hard work of bridge building is not alone. Other young people have their back; MAP has their back and there are millions more people out there who want to see them succeed. Our job is to connect them to those tools, to those people, and to each other so they might transcend political polarization and find solutions to the problems they were elected to resolve.”

Read More

news app
New platforms help overcome biased news reporting
Tero Vesalainen/Getty Images

The Selective Sanctity of Death: When Empathy Depends on Skin Color

Rampant calls to avoid sharing the video of Charlie Kirk’s death have been swift and emphatic across social media. “We need to keep our souls clean,” journalists plead. “Where are social media’s content moderators?” “How did we get so desensitized?” The moral outrage is palpable; the demands for human dignity urgent and clear.

But as a Black woman who has been forced to witness the constant virality of Black death, I must ask: where was this widespread anger for George Floyd? For Philando Castile? For Daunte Wright? For Tyre Nichols?

Keep ReadingShow less
Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making
Mount Rushmore
Photo by John Bakator on Unsplash

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

No one can denounce the New York Yankee fan for boasting that her favorite ballclub has won more World Series championships than any other. At 27 titles, the Bronx Bombers claim more than twice their closest competitor.

No one can question admirers of the late, great Chick Corea, or the equally astonishing Alison Krauss, for their virtually unrivaled Grammy victories. At 27 gold statues, only Beyoncé and Quincy Jones have more in the popular categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Trump’s mass deportations promise security but deliver economic pain, family separation, and chaos. Here’s why this policy is failing America.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

The Cruel Arithmetic of Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

As summer 2025 winds down, the Trump administration’s deportation machine is operating at full throttle—removing over one million people in six months and fulfilling a campaign promise to launch the “largest deportation operation in American history.” For supporters, this is a victory lap for law and order. For the rest of the lot, it’s a costly illusion—one that trades complexity for spectacle and security for chaos.

Let’s dispense with the fantasy first. The administration insists that mass deportations will save billions, reduce crime, and protect American jobs. But like most political magic tricks, the numbers vanish under scrutiny. The Economic Policy Institute warns that this policy could destroy millions of jobs—not just for immigrants but for U.S.-born workers in sectors like construction, elder care, and child care. That’s not just a fiscal cliff—it is fewer teachers, fewer caregivers, and fewer homes built. It is inflation with a human face. In fact, child care alone could shrink by over 15%, leaving working parents stranded and employers scrambling.

Meanwhile, the Peterson Institute projects a drop in GDP and employment, while the Penn Wharton School’s Budget Model estimates that deporting unauthorized workers over a decade would slash Social Security revenue and inflate deficits by nearly $900 billion. That’s not a typo. It’s a fiscal cliff dressed up as border security.

And then there’s food. Deporting farmworkers doesn’t just leave fields fallow—it drives up prices. Analysts predict a 10% spike in food costs, compounding inflation and squeezing families already living paycheck to paycheck. In California, where immigrant renters are disproportionately affected, eviction rates are climbing. The Urban Institute warns that deportations are deepening the housing crisis by gutting the construction workforce. So much for protecting American livelihoods.

But the real cost isn’t measured in dollars. It’s measured in broken families, empty classrooms, and quiet despair. The administration has deployed 10,000 armed service members to the border and ramped up “self-deportation” tactics—policies so harsh they force people to leave voluntarily. The result: Children skipping meals because their parents fear applying for food assistance; Cancer patients deported mid-treatment; and LGBTQ+ youth losing access to mental health care. The Human Rights Watch calls it a “crueler world for immigrants.” That’s putting it mildly.

This isn’t targeted enforcement. It’s a dragnet. Green card holders, long-term residents, and asylum seekers are swept up alongside undocumented workers. Viral videos show ICE raids at schools, hospitals, and churches. Lawsuits are piling up. And the chilling effect is real: immigrant communities are retreating from public life, afraid to report crimes or seek help. That’s not safety. That’s silence. Legal scholars warn that the administration’s tactics—raids at schools, churches, and hospitals—may violate Fourth Amendment protections and due process norms.

Even the administration’s security claims are shaky. Yes, border crossings are down—by about 60%, thanks to policies like “Remain in Mexico.” But deportation numbers haven’t met the promised scale. The Migration Policy Institute notes that monthly averages hover around 14,500, far below the millions touted. And the root causes of undocumented immigration—like visa overstays, which account for 60% of cases—remain untouched.

Crime reduction? Also murky. FBI data shows declines in some areas, but experts attribute this more to economic trends than immigration enforcement. In fact, fear in immigrant communities may be making things worse. When people won’t talk to the police, crimes go unreported. That’s not justice. That’s dysfunction.

Public opinion is catching up. In February, 59% of Americans supported mass deportations. By July, that number had cratered. Gallup reports a 25-point drop in favor of immigration cuts. The Pew Research Center finds that 75% of Democrats—and a growing number of independents—think the policy goes too far. Even Trump-friendly voices like Joe Rogan are balking, calling raids on “construction workers and gardeners” a betrayal of common sense.

On social media, the backlash is swift. Users on X (formerly Twitter) call the policy “ineffective,” “manipulative,” and “theater.” And they’re not wrong. This isn’t about solving immigration. It’s about staging a show—one where fear plays the villain and facts are the understudy.

The White House insists this is what voters wanted. But a narrow electoral win isn’t a blank check for policies that harm the economy and fray the social fabric. Alternatives exist: Targeted enforcement focused on violent offenders; visa reform to address overstays; and legal pathways to fill labor gaps. These aren’t radical ideas—they’re pragmatic ones. And they don’t require tearing families apart to work.

Trump’s deportation blitz is a mirage. It promises safety but delivers instability. It claims to protect jobs but undermines the very sectors that keep the country running. It speaks the language of law and order but acts with the recklessness of a demolition crew. Alternatives exist—and they work. Cities that focus on community policing and legal pathways report higher public safety and stronger economies. Reform doesn’t require cruelty. It requires courage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Multi-colored speech bubbles overlapping.

Stanford’s Strengthening Democracy Challenge shows a key way to reduce political violence: reveal that most Americans reject it.

Getty Images, MirageC

In the Aftermath of Assassinations, Let’s Show That Americans Overwhelmingly Disapprove of Political Violence

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination—and the assassination of Minnesota state legislator Melissa Hortman only three months ago—questions inevitably arise about how to reduce the likelihood of similar heinous actions.

Results from arguably the most important study focused on the U.S. context, the Strengthening Democracy Challenge run by Stanford University, point to one straightforward answer: show people that very few in the other party support political violence. This approach has been shown to reduce support for political violence.

Keep ReadingShow less