Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Meet the reformer: Rita Bosworth, pushing for blue-tinged mapmaking reform

Rita Bosworth of the Sister District Project

"The hardest part of this work is acknowledging you will always be walking uphill both ways, and maintaining the mental toughness and hope required to keep doing it," says Rita Bosworth.

Rita Bosworth

After a dozen years as a federal public defender, Rita Bosworth and three colleagues started the Sister District Project the week after the last presidential election. She is now CEO and has watched its campaign volunteer roster swell to 45,000 and its fundraising for Democratic state legislative candidates crest $2.8 million. While the group's work is overtly partisan, its objective is aligned with one of the democracy reform movement's main goals. Turning statehouses more blue this fall, Bosworth argues, will lead to less partisan gerrymandering and a fairer redrawing of legislative and congressional boundaries for the 2020s. Her answers have been edited for clarity and length.

What's the tweet-length description of your organization?

A grassroots political nonprofit that organizes volunteers in progressive communities and "sisters" them with Democratic state legislative candidates in other parts of the country who need resources to win.


Describe your very first civic engagement.

I was involved in 4-H as a kid. And I spent a lot of time volunteering in my community — visiting senior centers, gardening and beautification projects, and food and toy drives.

What was your biggest professional triumph?

I have always worked in fields where it takes years to achieve what you might consider a victory, so it's hard to pinpoint a moment. I spent many years litigating against the racial disparity in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine offenses. Eventually the law was changed to reduce the disparity, which had a real and positive impact on many of my clients. At Sister District, we are starting to see power shifts and policy changes in states after several years of concentrated effort — ours and many others' — and that's incredibly rewarding.

And your most disappointing setback?

Setbacks in social justice work are often structural, put in motion years before you started doing the work. Working in criminal justice allowed me to see how our laws, policies and processes keep people from succeeding, particularly poor people of color. No matter how hard you work, you can't address these systemic problems. Working in politics is similarly challenging. Our electoral systems create almost insurmountable obstacles to free and fair elections, rooting out corruption and maintaining a fair balance of power. The tools available to make change are limited and require a lot of resources. So the hardest part of this work is acknowledging you will always be walking uphill both ways, and maintaining the mental toughness and hope required to keep doing it.

How does your identity influence the way you go about your work?

I have always been a little obsessed with fairness, which can be challenging when we live in a world that is profoundly unfair in almost every way. But there are still things we have the power to make more fair, if we commit to doing so. I like to gather all the facts, talk to all the stakeholders and make the best decisions possible to benefit the greater good of society. I'm also always thinking of the country's vast economic and racial divisions, which are compounded and perpetuated by the status quo, and what I can do to break those down.

What's the best advice you've ever been given?

Don't kiss up or kick down. Just be your authentic self.

Create a new flavor for Ben & Jerry's.

There's a reason I'm not an ice cream maker.

What is your favorite TV show or movie about politics?

I admit liking political shows that give an uplifting view of how we wish politics could play out. Recently I've enjoyed "Madam Secretary," the CBS series that ended last year about a former CIA analyst and political science professor who becomes secretary of State.

What's the last thing you do on your phone at night?

Check my schedule for the next day and set my alarm.

What is your deepest, darkest secret?

Sometimes I consider dropping it all, moving to the beach and writing screenplays.

Read More

Understanding the Debate on Health Secretary Kennedy’s Vaccine Panelists

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., January 29, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chen Mengtong/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)

Understanding the Debate on Health Secretary Kennedy’s Vaccine Panelists

Summary

On June 9, 2025, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), dismissed all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Secretary Kennedy claimed the move was necessary to eliminate “conflicts of interest” and restore public trust in vaccines, which he argued had been compromised by the influence of pharmaceutical companies. However, this decision strays from precedent and has drawn significant criticism from medical experts and public health officials across the country. Some argue that this shake-up undermines scientific independence and opens the door to politicized decision-making in vaccine policy.

Background: What Is ACIP?

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is a federal advisory group that helps guide national vaccine policy. Established in 1964, it has over 60 years of credibility as an evidence-based body of medical and scientific experts. ACIP makes official recommendations on vaccine schedules for both children and adults, determining which immunizations are required for school entry, covered by health insurance, and prioritized in public health programs. The committee is composed of specialists in immunology, epidemiology, pediatrics, infectious disease, and public health, all of whom are vetted for scientific rigor and ethical standards. ACIP’s guidance holds national weight, shaping both public perception of vaccines and the policies of institutions like schools, hospitals, and insurers.

Keep ReadingShow less
MQ-9 Predator Drones Hunt Migrants at the Border
Way into future, RPA Airmen participate in Red Flag 16-2 > Creech ...

MQ-9 Predator Drones Hunt Migrants at the Border

FT HUACHUCA, Ariz. - Inside a windowless and dark shipping container turned into a high-tech surveillance command center, two analysts peered at their own set of six screens that showed data coming in from an MQ-9 Predator B drone. Both were looking for two adults and a child who had crossed the U.S.-Mexico border and had fled when a Border Patrol agent approached in a truck.

Inside the drone hangar on the other side of the Fort Huachuca base sat another former shipping container, this one occupied by a drone pilot and a camera operator who pivoted the drone's camera to scan nine square miles of shrubs and saguaros for the migrants. Like the command center, the onetime shipping container was dark, lit only by the glow of the computer screens.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Trump 2020 flag outside of a home.

As Trump’s second presidency unfolds, rural America—the foundation of his 2024 election win—is feeling the sting. From collapsing export markets to cuts in healthcare and infrastructure, those very voters are losing faith.

Getty Images, ablokhin

Trump’s 2.0 Actions Have Harmed Rural America Who Voted for Him

Daryl Royal, the 20-year University of Texas football coach, once said, “You've gotta dance with them that brung ya.” The modern adaptation of that quote is “you gotta dance with the one who brought you to the party.” The expression means you should remain loyal to the people or things that helped you succeed.

Sixty-three percent of America’s 3,144 counties are predominantly rural, and Donald Trump won 93 percent of those counties in 2024. Analyses show that rural counties have become increasingly solid Republican, and Trump’s margin of victory within rural America reached a new high in the 2024 election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hands Off Our Elections: States and Congress, Not Presidents, Set the Rules
white concrete dome museum

Hands Off Our Elections: States and Congress, Not Presidents, Set the Rules

Trust in elections is fragile – and once lost, it is extraordinarily difficult to rebuild. While Democrats and Republicans disagree on many election policies, there is broad bipartisan agreement on one point: executive branch interference in elections undermines the constitutional authority of states and Congress to determine how elections are run.

Recent executive branch actions threaten to upend this constitutional balance, and Congress must act before it’s too late. To be clear – this is not just about the current president. Keeping the executive branch out of elections is a crucial safeguard against power grabs by any future president, Democrat or Republican.

Keep ReadingShow less