Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Something good is actually happening in Congress

News

Something good is actually happening in Congress
Getty Images

Bradford Fitch is the President and CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation, and a former congressional staffer.

It’s easy to see why Americans have such a dim view of our Congress. The national media bombards us with negative news about our national legislature, and generally eschews any story that demonstrates our government at work. Which is why the Congressional Management Foundation’s Democracy Awards is such a valuable counter-narrative. The awards program, launched in 2018 with our founding partner the Bridge Alliance, is one of the only examples of a nonpartisan organization recognizing excellence in Congress.


The vision and goals for the Democracy Awards are simple and based on the success CMF has seen in our 47-year history of working with Congress. First, we wanted to recognize legislators and their staffs, identifying best practices in congressional offices. Second, the Democracy Awards seeks to provide examples of best practices to other Members of Congress, offering them roadmaps to improving their operations and services to constituents. Finally, we hope the Democracy Awards will increase public understanding of the Congress. CMF hopes that we can shine a light on those Members and offices, if only for a brief moment, then perhaps we can chip away at the wall of cynicism in our nation.

This year’s winners, which were announced in August, provide Americans with examples of excellence in our democracy: a group of dedicated public servants working with their staffs to improve the lives of their constituents.

In the Constituent Services category, the Republican winner was Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-SD). One of the creative methods Johnson uses to engage constituents are called "Drive-Thru Dusty Town Halls.” During the pandemic, when social distancing was required, Johnson addressed constituents on the back of a pick-up truck, answering questions with a blow horn. The Democratic winner is Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-IL). In less than four years in office Underwood has worked with federal agencies and closed nearly 5,000 constituent cases, recovering millions of dollars on behalf of constituents. Underwood also hosted almost 20 virtual workshops on solving problems in working with executive branch agencies.

In the Constituent Accountability and Accessibility category, Rep. John Curtis (R-UT) was recognized for holding more than 300 constituent service or town hall-style events since coming to Congress in 2017. The Democratic winner, Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA) has an unusual policy of never leaving a town hall meeting until the last constituent attending has had an opportunity to ask a question.

The “Life in Congress” Workplace Environment category recognizes excellence in running a congressional office operation, which leads to lower staff turnover, better employee engagement, translating into better services for constituents. In the office of Democratic winner Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) staff receive 30 days of total paid leave per year - 15 days of vacation plus 15 days of sick leave which can be used for Mental Health Days at any point during the year. Staff also are continually invited to offer their ideas for everything from the Member’s policy positions to how to best connect our district’s needs to the DC office’s work. Republican winner Rep. Barry Moore (R-AL) created a telework policy that empowers staff to coordinate schedules so that the office always remains staffed, and every staffer can periodically work from home. Sworn in as a freshman lawmaker in 2021 at the height of the pandemic, the office immediately provided lightweight laptops, iPads and iPhones, so every staffer could easily continue working outside of the office, whether from home or other locations.

The Innovation and Modernization category winners were easy to identify – the Chair and Vice Chair of the Select Committee on Modernization, Rep. Derek Kilmer (D-WA) and Rep. William Timmons (R-SC). From 2019 to 2023 the Committee not only passed recommendations to improve the Congress, the bipartisan committee operated unlike other committees, demonstrating a degree of effectiveness and comity unprecedented in recent congressional history. The Committee passed 202 recommendations affecting congressional staff pay, information technology, and reforming the congressionally-directed spending, formerly called earmarks.

The winners of the Democracy Awards shine in sharp contrast to other forces in our nation which are chipping away at some of the fundamental principles this nation was founded upon. Whether it be election workers leaving their jobs because of constant harassment, or a staff assistant in a congressional office fielding yet another death threat. The radical fringes are in the shadows no more, they are attacking some of our basic constitutional principles, and are even sanctioned by some who swore to defend that same Constitution. This means that for those of us who believe in the Congress cannot be passive observers. We must all be stewards of the Democracy Awards just as we must all be stewards of American democracy.

The examples above of outstanding public service are evidence of where our democracy is working. And it’s working because of the dedicated, hardworking Members and staff who serve in Congress and strive to implement our common democratic values and practices. Perhaps the best way we can combat those who attack our democracy is to prove to them it actually works. The winners of the Congressional Management Foundation’s Democracy Awards are examples of democracy working in the best spirit of our founders’ vision for our nation. And when you encounter a naysayer who believes all of government is broken, who are losing hope in American democracy - tell them a different story. Tell them you know examples of excellence, of patriots serving under a dome – the winners of the Democracy Awards.


Read More

Welcome to Trump’s lame duck presidency

President Donald Trump speaks to the press in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 3, 2026.

(Mandel NGAN/AFP via Getty Images/TCA)

Welcome to Trump’s lame duck presidency

It's been a while since we saw a lame duck presidency — long enough in politics to maybe forget what one looks like.

In October 2014, President Barack Obama hit his lowest approval rating yet at 40%. The midterm elections were an absolute bloodbath for Democrats — Republicans expanded their majority in the House by 13 seats and took control of the Senate with a gain of nine seats.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Reporters and members of the media raise their hand to ask a question to U.S. President Donald Trump.

Reporters and members of the media raise their hand to ask a question to U.S. President Donald Trump during a press conference in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House on April 25, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Al Drago / Getty Images

Trump’s 15 Attacks on Press Freedom Mark an Unprecedented Crisis

“Freedom of conscience, of education, of speech, of assembly are among the very fundamentals of democracy, and all of them would be nullified should freedom of the press ever be successfully challenged.” – Franklin D. Roosevelt, 32nd U.S. President

Throughout America’s 250 years, the tension between the White House and the press is as old as the republic itself. Several presidents haven’t necessarily tried to repeal the First Amendment (which protects the press), per se, or the Fifth Amendment (which protects journalists’ confidential sources). Instead, some have tried to control the narrative and limit press access.

Keep ReadingShow less
Academic Tracking in K-12 Schools: Improving Achievement or Widening Gaps?
red apple fruit on four pyle books

Academic Tracking in K-12 Schools: Improving Achievement or Widening Gaps?

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Tracking is widespread and begins early. Currently, 75 percent of eighth graders nationwide are affected by tracking and the process begins in first and second grade.
  • Successful detracking requires adequate support. Districts that detrack with enough support and resources for both teachers and students can narrow achievement gaps without lowering performance.Successful examples often come from communities with extensive resources.
  • Research on the impact of tracking on achievement is mixed. Some studies show tracking benefits advanced students at no cost to others, but other studies have shown the opposite; minimum educational gains with significant costs in equity.

What is Academic Tracking?

Academic tracking is the practice of assigning students to different classrooms based on earlier academic achievement or perceived ability. It affects approximately 75 percent of eighth graders nationwide and begins as early as first and second grade. Unlike temporary ability grouping, where a teacher might divide students into small groups for a single lesson on fractions, tracking sorts students into specific pathways such as remedial math, regular Algebra I, or honors Algebra I, with math being the most heavily tracked subject in American schools.

Keep ReadingShow less