Bradford Fitch is the President and CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation, and a former congressional staffer.
It’s easy to see why Americans have such a dim view of our Congress. The national media bombards us with negative news about our national legislature, and generally eschews any story that demonstrates our government at work. Which is why the Congressional Management Foundation’s Democracy Awards is such a valuable counter-narrative. The awards program, launched in 2018 with our founding partner the Bridge Alliance, is one of the only examples of a nonpartisan organization recognizing excellence in Congress.
The vision and goals for the Democracy Awards are simple and based on the success CMF has seen in our 47-year history of working with Congress. First, we wanted to recognize legislators and their staffs, identifying best practices in congressional offices. Second, the Democracy Awards seeks to provide examples of best practices to other Members of Congress, offering them roadmaps to improving their operations and services to constituents. Finally, we hope the Democracy Awards will increase public understanding of the Congress. CMF hopes that we can shine a light on those Members and offices, if only for a brief moment, then perhaps we can chip away at the wall of cynicism in our nation.
This year’s winners, which were announced in August, provide Americans with examples of excellence in our democracy: a group of dedicated public servants working with their staffs to improve the lives of their constituents.
In the Constituent Services category, the Republican winner was Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-SD). One of the creative methods Johnson uses to engage constituents are called "Drive-Thru Dusty Town Halls.” During the pandemic, when social distancing was required, Johnson addressed constituents on the back of a pick-up truck, answering questions with a blow horn. The Democratic winner is Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-IL). In less than four years in office Underwood has worked with federal agencies and closed nearly 5,000 constituent cases, recovering millions of dollars on behalf of constituents. Underwood also hosted almost 20 virtual workshops on solving problems in working with executive branch agencies.
In the Constituent Accountability and Accessibility category, Rep. John Curtis (R-UT) was recognized for holding more than 300 constituent service or town hall-style events since coming to Congress in 2017. The Democratic winner, Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA) has an unusual policy of never leaving a town hall meeting until the last constituent attending has had an opportunity to ask a question.
The “Life in Congress” Workplace Environment category recognizes excellence in running a congressional office operation, which leads to lower staff turnover, better employee engagement, translating into better services for constituents. In the office of Democratic winner Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) staff receive 30 days of total paid leave per year - 15 days of vacation plus 15 days of sick leave which can be used for Mental Health Days at any point during the year. Staff also are continually invited to offer their ideas for everything from the Member’s policy positions to how to best connect our district’s needs to the DC office’s work. Republican winner Rep. Barry Moore (R-AL) created a telework policy that empowers staff to coordinate schedules so that the office always remains staffed, and every staffer can periodically work from home. Sworn in as a freshman lawmaker in 2021 at the height of the pandemic, the office immediately provided lightweight laptops, iPads and iPhones, so every staffer could easily continue working outside of the office, whether from home or other locations.
The Innovation and Modernization category winners were easy to identify – the Chair and Vice Chair of the Select Committee on Modernization, Rep. Derek Kilmer (D-WA) and Rep. William Timmons (R-SC). From 2019 to 2023 the Committee not only passed recommendations to improve the Congress, the bipartisan committee operated unlike other committees, demonstrating a degree of effectiveness and comity unprecedented in recent congressional history. The Committee passed 202 recommendations affecting congressional staff pay, information technology, and reforming the congressionally-directed spending, formerly called earmarks.
The winners of the Democracy Awards shine in sharp contrast to other forces in our nation which are chipping away at some of the fundamental principles this nation was founded upon. Whether it be election workers leaving their jobs because of constant harassment, or a staff assistant in a congressional office fielding yet another death threat. The radical fringes are in the shadows no more, they are attacking some of our basic constitutional principles, and are even sanctioned by some who swore to defend that same Constitution. This means that for those of us who believe in the Congress cannot be passive observers. We must all be stewards of the Democracy Awards just as we must all be stewards of American democracy.
The examples above of outstanding public service are evidence of where our democracy is working. And it’s working because of the dedicated, hardworking Members and staff who serve in Congress and strive to implement our common democratic values and practices. Perhaps the best way we can combat those who attack our democracy is to prove to them it actually works. The winners of the Congressional Management Foundation’s Democracy Awards are examples of democracy working in the best spirit of our founders’ vision for our nation. And when you encounter a naysayer who believes all of government is broken, who are losing hope in American democracy - tell them a different story. Tell them you know examples of excellence, of patriots serving under a dome – the winners of the Democracy Awards.
A golden tray sits on the Resolute Desk as President Donald Trump speaks during an announcement on American nuclear innovation in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Trump is signing multiple executive orders targeting the nuclear energy sector and easing rules for new reactors and nuclear fuel supply chains.
Trump’s hubris rivals the fallen heroes of ancient Greek mythology
In January, the New York Times asked President Donald Trump if there were any limits on his global powers.
“Yeah,” the president responded, “there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”
That was eight months ago, but fortunately Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster adaptation of “The Odyssey” has made ancient Greek literature newly relevant. Before that window closes, I’d like to talk about hubris.
Today, the term mostly means excessive pride or arrogance. That’s part of what the Greeks meant by it too, but the meaning was a bit richer and more specific. Hubris was an insolent or outrageous act that offended the gods, often because the transgressor was claiming abilities or authorities that solely belonged to supreme beings.
Nolan renamed and slightly modified the concept of xenia for the film, calling it “Zeus’ law.” In the director’s telling, mortals should follow the rules laid out by the gods, specifically the requirement to treat strangers with respect lest they be gods in disguise.
In a sense, hubris is the opposite, or at least the rejection, of xenia. The hubris of the suitors, and at times Odysseus himself, invites punishment by the gods and their mortal instruments.
Which brings me back to Donald Trump. His claim that there are no constraints on his personal power to dictate events on the global stage was one of the greatest expressions of hubris ever uttered by a political leader.
Trump’s claim was obviously false when he made it.
He vowed that he could end the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours. He’s proved powerless to make that happen. If he had divine powers to work his will, why would he have balked at implementing his tariffs so often that Wall Street adopted the “TACO trade” term for his deals? “TACO” stands for “Trump always chickens out.”
And why would Trump have made so many embarrassing concessions to China — from rescinding tariffs on Chinese goods to allowing them to buy crucial and incredibly valuable computer chips?
But Trump saw his success at capturing Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro as proof of his ability to launch missiles to the same effect as Zeus’ lightning bolts. Trump believed he was the most powerful man who ever lived.
This is no exaggeration. In March, when the Iran invasion seemed successful, Trump gave a document penned by“Presidential Historian David King” to New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan purporting to prove that Trump was “the most powerful person to have EVER walked this planet.” King was, in fact, a businessman and occasional caddy for legendary golfer Gary Player.
King compared Trump favorably to many of history’s most powerful, and often heinous, figures: Alexander the Great, Attila the Hun, William the Conqueror, Napoleon Bonaparte, Joseph Stalin, Genghis Khan, Mao Tse Tung, Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Lenin. Many of these men thought they were the most powerful person in the world, too. And many were defeated precisely because they believed it.
At least Napoleon and Hitler had a string of truly impressive victories before they learned the folly of hubris. The limits on Trump’s power have been exposed by far less august forces than the combined might of the allies in World War II or the fearsome Russian winter.
Iran is a comparatively middling power. But the regime’s ability to absorb punishment while imposing its will on the Strait of Hormuz has proved to be a greater constraint on Trump’s power than his morality or mind. We should note that, at least rhetorically, his morality has not proved much of a constraint. He has repeatedly promised to destroy Iranian “civilization” if the regime refuses to capitulate.
But they haven’t — and won’t anytime soon — because the regime’s tolerance for pain far outstrips Trump’s. The combined fear of skyrocketing oil prices, outrage of Gulf state potentates, diminishing weapon supplies and domestic unpopularity is doing the work that international law, congressional oversight and the collective opinion of foreign policy experts can’t or won’t do.
If I considered Trump more heroic than reason and facts could allow, I would say his Sisyphean predicament has the whiff of Greek tragedy to it. Trump is vexed by the fact that the Iranians won’t honor deals or ratify his countless premature claims of victory — giving new meaning to his vow that his presidency would make people tired of winning. It’s almost like they’re out-Trumping Trump.
Things might have gone better if he’d heeded that great Greek tragedian Sophocles: “For Zeus utterly abhors the boasts of a proud tongue.”
____
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.