Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Here’s where Congress performed better than you thought in 2023

Rep. Dusty Johnson and Rep. Lauren Underwood

Rep. Dusty Johnson and Rep. Lauren Underwood provide two stellar examples of constituent service, writes Fitch.

Fitch is the president and CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation and a former congressional staffer.

Many Americans think they know Congress by reading the news and watching House and Senate floor activities. What most people don’t know is that Congress is made up of 535 small businesses, each managed by a lawmaker who makes all the decisions a small-business leader must make. Everything from establishing salaries to managing employee benefits to setting the strategic direction the office will take.

And like small businesses, each congressional office has a “customer service” operation to cater to the needs and requests of its constituents. The Congressional Management Foundation has been studying the business aspects of running congressional offices for decades and has recognized the best in Congress through our Democracy Awards. These “Oscars for Congress,” co-founded with the Bridge Alliance (which operates The Fulcrum), is the only nonpartisan objective assessment of the individual performance of members of Congress and of their staffs’ accountability to constituents.


The Democracy Awards were designed to identify those public servants who rise above their colleagues in vision and practice responsiveness to constituents. Just like a business provides customer service, members of Congress and their staff all have constituent service operations. Here are five characteristics of congressional offices that successfully serve the American people.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

One common characteristic of successful offices is leadership vision. One winner, Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.), has established “stewardship” as one of the top values the office follows. This manifests itself in several ways, including connecting constituents with the governor’s office for state-related matters and helping constituents find access to food and shelter through local agencies and support systems.

A second characteristic is the establishment of metrics. In less than four years in office, Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.) has closed 5,573 cases, recovered $24,628,317 on behalf of constituents, and hosted close to 20 virtual workshops. Her office has guided constituents through interactions with the federal government, such as signing up for Medicare, filing taxes or achieving a small-business certification.

The third characteristic of great constituent service in Congress is establishing a culture of service. Underwood’s staff report they are guided by the following values: service, integrity, responsiveness, productivity, accessibility, kindness and excellence. In Johnson’s office, part of the customer service culture is based on creativity. During the pandemic, with face-to-face contact unavailable, the office set up “Drive-Thru Dusty Town Halls," where the congressman met constituents in parking lots and they yelled questions while he answered from the back of a pick-up truck.

A fourth characteristic is to offer diverse means and channels to access. Rep. Barry Moore (R-Ala.) has fun with the “B” in his name, inviting constituents to "break bread" with Barry by hosting public events at local restaurants, naming them "Breakfast with Barry," "Burgers with Barry" and "Buffet with Barry." Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D-Calif.) hosts regular virtual and mobile district office hours, which is an opportunity for constituents to meet one-on-one with their representative.

The fifth characteristic is a willingness to accept criticism. If DeSaulnier finds someone on social media disagreeing with him, his staff will reach out to set up an appointment so he can hear their point of view. He also refuses to leave any town hall meeting until every question (and questioner) is exhausted. After completing work with individual constituents, Moore’s office sends them a survey to provide feedback – both good and bad. This enables the staff to change and improve their processes so that they can provide better constituent services.

It's hard to have a positive view of Congress with the barrage of news stories touting their imperfections and foibles. Yet Americans must understand that even though they rarely see the good side of Congress, public servants are tirelessly aiming to respond to the needs and aspirations of their constituents. I’m not saying they’re all saints – they’re not. Yet nearly every member of Congress feels both a moral and a political obligation to provide the best service they can to their constituents.

Read More

Project 2025: The Department of Labor

Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote and political reform director at New America. You can reach him on X @StevenHill1776.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a right-wing blueprint for Donald Trump’s return to the White House, is an ambitious manifesto to redesign the federal government and its many administrative agencies to support and sustain neo-conservative dominance for the next decade. One of the agencies in its crosshairs is the Department of Labor, as well as its affiliated agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

Project 2025 proposes a remake of the Department of Labor in order to roll back decades of labor laws and rights amidst a nostalgic “back to the future” framing based on race, gender, religion and anti-abortion sentiment. But oddly, tucked into the corners of the document are some real nuggets of innovative and progressive thinking that propose certain labor rights which even many liberals have never dared to propose.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Preamble to the U.S. Constitution
mscornelius/Getty Images

We can’t amend 'We the People' but 'we' do need a constitutional reboot

LaRue writes at Structure Matters. He is former deputy director of the Eisenhower Institute and of the American Society of International Law.

The following article was accepted for publication prior to the attempted assassination attempt of Donald Trump. Both the author and the editors determined no changes were necessary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Beau Breslin on C-SPAN
C-CSPAN screenshot

Project 2025: A C-SPAN interview

Beau Breslin, a regular contributor to The Fulcrum, was recently interviewed on C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal” about Project 2025.

Breslin is the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair of Political Science at Skidmore College and author of “A Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation’s Fundamental Law.” He writes “A Republic, if we can keep it,” a Fulcrum series to assist American citizens on the bumpy road ahead this election year. By highlighting components, principles and stories of the Constitution, Breslin hopes to remind us that the American political experiment remains, in the words of Alexander Hamilton, the “most interesting in the world.”

Keep ReadingShow less
People protesting laws against homelessness

People protest outside the Supreme Court as the justices prepared to hear Grants Pass v. Johnson on April 22.

Matt McClain/The Washington Post via Getty Images

High court upholds law criminalizing homelessness, making things worse

Herring is an assistant professor of sociology at UCLA, co-author of an amicus brief in Johnson v. Grants Pass and a member of the Scholars Strategy Network.

In late June, the Supreme Court decided in the case of Johnson v. Grants Pass that the government can criminalize homelessness. In the court’s 6-3 decision, split along ideological lines, the conservative justices ruled that bans on sleeping in public when there are no shelter beds available do not violate the Constitution’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

This ruling will only make homelessness worse. It may also propel U.S. localities into a “race to the bottom” in passing increasingly punitive policies aimed at locking up or banishing the unhoused.

Keep ReadingShow less
Project 2025: A federal Parents' Bill of Rights

Republican House members hold a press event to highlight the introduction in 2023.

Bill O'Leary/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Project 2025: A federal Parents' Bill of Rights

Biffle is a podcast host and contributor at BillTrack50.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

Project 2025, the conservative Heritage Foundation’s blueprint for a second Trump administration, includes an outline for a Parents' Bill of Rights, cementing parental considerations as a “top tier” right.

The proposal calls for passing legislation to ensure families have a "fair hearing in court when the federal government enforces policies that undermine their rights to raise, educate, and care for their children." Further, “the law would require the government to satisfy ‘strict scrutiny’ — the highest standard of judicial review — when the government infringes parental rights.”

Keep ReadingShow less