Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Here’s where Congress performed better than you thought in 2023

Opinion

Rep. Dusty Johnson and Rep. Lauren Underwood

Rep. Dusty Johnson and Rep. Lauren Underwood provide two stellar examples of constituent service, writes Fitch.

Fitch is the president and CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation and a former congressional staffer.

Many Americans think they know Congress by reading the news and watching House and Senate floor activities. What most people don’t know is that Congress is made up of 535 small businesses, each managed by a lawmaker who makes all the decisions a small-business leader must make. Everything from establishing salaries to managing employee benefits to setting the strategic direction the office will take.

And like small businesses, each congressional office has a “customer service” operation to cater to the needs and requests of its constituents. The Congressional Management Foundation has been studying the business aspects of running congressional offices for decades and has recognized the best in Congress through our Democracy Awards. These “Oscars for Congress,” co-founded with the Bridge Alliance (which operates The Fulcrum), is the only nonpartisan objective assessment of the individual performance of members of Congress and of their staffs’ accountability to constituents.


The Democracy Awards were designed to identify those public servants who rise above their colleagues in vision and practice responsiveness to constituents. Just like a business provides customer service, members of Congress and their staff all have constituent service operations. Here are five characteristics of congressional offices that successfully serve the American people.

One common characteristic of successful offices is leadership vision. One winner, Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.), has established “stewardship” as one of the top values the office follows. This manifests itself in several ways, including connecting constituents with the governor’s office for state-related matters and helping constituents find access to food and shelter through local agencies and support systems.

A second characteristic is the establishment of metrics. In less than four years in office, Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.) has closed 5,573 cases, recovered $24,628,317 on behalf of constituents, and hosted close to 20 virtual workshops. Her office has guided constituents through interactions with the federal government, such as signing up for Medicare, filing taxes or achieving a small-business certification.

The third characteristic of great constituent service in Congress is establishing a culture of service. Underwood’s staff report they are guided by the following values: service, integrity, responsiveness, productivity, accessibility, kindness and excellence. In Johnson’s office, part of the customer service culture is based on creativity. During the pandemic, with face-to-face contact unavailable, the office set up “Drive-Thru Dusty Town Halls," where the congressman met constituents in parking lots and they yelled questions while he answered from the back of a pick-up truck.

A fourth characteristic is to offer diverse means and channels to access. Rep. Barry Moore (R-Ala.) has fun with the “B” in his name, inviting constituents to "break bread" with Barry by hosting public events at local restaurants, naming them "Breakfast with Barry," "Burgers with Barry" and "Buffet with Barry." Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D-Calif.) hosts regular virtual and mobile district office hours, which is an opportunity for constituents to meet one-on-one with their representative.

The fifth characteristic is a willingness to accept criticism. If DeSaulnier finds someone on social media disagreeing with him, his staff will reach out to set up an appointment so he can hear their point of view. He also refuses to leave any town hall meeting until every question (and questioner) is exhausted. After completing work with individual constituents, Moore’s office sends them a survey to provide feedback – both good and bad. This enables the staff to change and improve their processes so that they can provide better constituent services.

It's hard to have a positive view of Congress with the barrage of news stories touting their imperfections and foibles. Yet Americans must understand that even though they rarely see the good side of Congress, public servants are tirelessly aiming to respond to the needs and aspirations of their constituents. I’m not saying they’re all saints – they’re not. Yet nearly every member of Congress feels both a moral and a political obligation to provide the best service they can to their constituents.


Read More

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual policy conference at the Washington Convention Center March 6, 2018 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

After AIPAC failed to defeat El-Sayed in the Michigan Democratic Senate primary—after spending $32 million—it said that it remains committed to defeating El-Sayed and his "radical, anti-Israel" agenda in the general election. Which means it is poised to sink tens of millions of dollars in supporting Republican Mike Rogers. It also said that Haley Stevens, his opponent, had presented "an authentic Democratic agenda." Meaning that El-Sayed did not? And they think that Mike Rogers, a MAGA Trump supporter, does compared with El-Sayed?

How can AIPAC say that El-Sayed does not present an authentic Democratic agenda when his socialist stance is much more in line with the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence than most centrist Democrats'? And making it sound like AIPAC cares about an authentic Democratic agenda is deceitful, when in the same breath they make clear that they will support Mike Rogers, a Trump lackey, in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research
silhouette of person using microscope

Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research

Scientists and the federal government have been close partners since World War II. A landmark report by President Truman’s chief science advisor laid out a vision for government research that shaped eight decades of federally funded science. That vision is now at risk. In principle, the Trump administration has supported scientific research with its own vision for a new “golden age of science.” But in practice, the administration has upended the relationship between the government, researchers, and their institutions. The changes have alarmed working scientists and their allies, who have protested in record numbers.

In July, I moderated a webinar on “Rewriting the Rules: What’s happening to public science?” (read the transcript here). The webinar was co-sponsored by NAPA, CODE, and the Bridge Alliance, with Dr. Aaron Carroll of AcademyHealth, Dr. Chris Marcum of the Federation of American Scientists, Dr. Gretchen Goldman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Dr. Maryam Zaringhalam of the Center for Open Science. I also interviewed Cole Donovan of the Stand Up for Science Foundation by email.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democratic Party Suicide
a piece of paper cut out of the shape of a donkey
Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

Democratic Party Suicide

A recent New York Times article, "Moderate Democrats Prepare for 'War' Against an Ascendant Left," describes a disturbing perspective among mainstream, moderate, centrist Democrats. It is disturbing for many reasons.

First, there is the practical impact. If indeed mainstream Democrats attack socialist Democrats in a sustained, organized manner, there is only one possible result: the defeat of the Party in 2026 and the renewed vigor of Trump and his MAGA allies. Especially when combined with the all-out effort that AIPAC will mostly take to support Republican candidates running against Democratic candidates who are socialists. (See my article, "The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC.")

Keep ReadingShow less
An Iranian flag and the message "No King" graffitied on the ruins of the data center building of Sharif University of Technology after a U.S.-Israeli missile strike on April 7, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

How has the meaning of military victory changed? Explore Iran, deterrence, nuclear weapons, and why modern wars are fought with limited objectives.

Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images

The Last War We Understood

Every modern conflict seems to produce the same debate.

Supporters argue that military action achieved its objectives. Critics ask why the enemy still exists. Iran is only the latest example.

Keep ReadingShow less