Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Lawmakers, staffers honored at ‘Oscars for Congress’

Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard

Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard won a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Congressional Management Foundation.

Go Nakamura/Getty Images

The Congressional Management Foundation rolled out a figurative red carpet Thursday morning to present its annual Democracy Awards, or as they are more affectionately known, “the Oscars for Congress.”

Even though less than one-quarter of the American public approves of Congress’ performance, and much of the legislative activity can be reduced to politics and partisanship rather than productivity, there is still good work taking place.

And CMF, along with the Democracy Awards’ founding partner, the Bridge Alliance, honored some of the top performers on Capitol Hill.


Brad Fitch, president and CEO of CMF, noted that the awards ceremony comes at a critical time in our nations’ evolution, with election deniers and others on the fringes threatening the American system of government.

“Perhaps the best way we can combat those who attack our democracy is to prove to them it actually works,” Fitch said. “That there are people who still believe in excellence in public service and that demonstrate that patriotic commitment every day. They are the past, current, and future winners of the Congressional Management Foundation’s Democracy Awards.”

The Democracy Awards, like the Oscars, are broken down into several categories. But rather than honoring a man and a woman, CMF honors a Democrat and a Republican in each.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The top awards, for Lifetime Achievement, went to a pair of House members who are retiring at the end of the current session: Democrat Lucille Roybal-Allard of California and Republican Fred Upton of Michigan.

“Imagine what we could co-create if we had a Congress comprised of elected officials like the two receiving lifetime achievement awards,” said the Bridge Alliance’s Debilyn Molineau, who presented their awards. (Molineaux is also co-publisher of The Fulcrum, a project of the Bridge Alliance.)

She noted Upton’s cross-partisan endeavors that welcomed the 40 percent of Americans who do not identify with either major party. “In today’s environment, that takes a lot of courage, and I personally thank you,” she said.

Roybal-Allard was the first Mexican-American woman elected to Congress, when she won her first term in 1992, when the number of women in office nearly doubled. She became the first Latina to serve on the powerful Appropriations Committee (as well as chair one of its subcommittees.)

“You’ve broken through so many glass ceilings for those of us who will follow in your footsteps. Your tireless work for the people of your district, especially those who could not speak for themselves, is an example for the younger generation to follow,” said Molineaux.

The other awards for lawmakers were broken down into different aspects of the job, and Democratic Rep. Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania was named a winner in two of them.

  • Constituent service: Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Houlahan
  • Innovation and modernization: Rep. Garrett Graves (R-La.) and Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.)
  • “Life in Congress” (workplace environment): Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) and Houlahan
  • Transparency and accountability: Rep. Bryan Steil (R-Wis.) and Rep. Sharice Davids (D-Kan.)

In addition, CMF gave two awards for lifetime achievement by congressional staffers.

Annamarie Feeney, currently the senior constituent services representative for Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) has worked on Capitol Hill since 1987, handling constituent work for a series of lawmakers from Pennsylvania. According to CFM, she has helped thousands of constituents with various issues and recovered millions of dollars for individuals.

Ann Rogers, counsel for the Office of House Employment Counsel, provides legal advice related to labor laws covered under the Congressional Accountability Act and acts as legal representative for House employees. She has worked in the House for 27 years.

“We all know that Congress is not held in high regard by the American public. But those in this room also know that the Congress we see – the real Congress – is made up of amazing and dedicated public servants, tirelessly working for their constituents,” Fitch said. “CMF hopes that we can shine a light on those Members and offices, if only for a brief moment, then perhaps we can chip away at the wall of cynicism in our nation.”

Read More

Project 2025: The Department of Labor

Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote and political reform director at New America. You can reach him on X @StevenHill1776.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a right-wing blueprint for Donald Trump’s return to the White House, is an ambitious manifesto to redesign the federal government and its many administrative agencies to support and sustain neo-conservative dominance for the next decade. One of the agencies in its crosshairs is the Department of Labor, as well as its affiliated agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

Project 2025 proposes a remake of the Department of Labor in order to roll back decades of labor laws and rights amidst a nostalgic “back to the future” framing based on race, gender, religion and anti-abortion sentiment. But oddly, tucked into the corners of the document are some real nuggets of innovative and progressive thinking that propose certain labor rights which even many liberals have never dared to propose.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Preamble to the U.S. Constitution
mscornelius/Getty Images

We can’t amend 'We the People' but 'we' do need a constitutional reboot

LaRue writes at Structure Matters. He is former deputy director of the Eisenhower Institute and of the American Society of International Law.

The following article was accepted for publication prior to the attempted assassination attempt of Donald Trump. Both the author and the editors determined no changes were necessary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Beau Breslin on C-SPAN
C-CSPAN screenshot

Project 2025: A C-SPAN interview

Beau Breslin, a regular contributor to The Fulcrum, was recently interviewed on C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal” about Project 2025.

Breslin is the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair of Political Science at Skidmore College and author of “A Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation’s Fundamental Law.” He writes “A Republic, if we can keep it,” a Fulcrum series to assist American citizens on the bumpy road ahead this election year. By highlighting components, principles and stories of the Constitution, Breslin hopes to remind us that the American political experiment remains, in the words of Alexander Hamilton, the “most interesting in the world.”

Keep ReadingShow less
People protesting laws against homelessness

People protest outside the Supreme Court as the justices prepared to hear Grants Pass v. Johnson on April 22.

Matt McClain/The Washington Post via Getty Images

High court upholds law criminalizing homelessness, making things worse

Herring is an assistant professor of sociology at UCLA, co-author of an amicus brief in Johnson v. Grants Pass and a member of the Scholars Strategy Network.

In late June, the Supreme Court decided in the case of Johnson v. Grants Pass that the government can criminalize homelessness. In the court’s 6-3 decision, split along ideological lines, the conservative justices ruled that bans on sleeping in public when there are no shelter beds available do not violate the Constitution’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

This ruling will only make homelessness worse. It may also propel U.S. localities into a “race to the bottom” in passing increasingly punitive policies aimed at locking up or banishing the unhoused.

Keep ReadingShow less
Project 2025: A federal Parents' Bill of Rights

Republican House members hold a press event to highlight the introduction in 2023.

Bill O'Leary/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Project 2025: A federal Parents' Bill of Rights

Biffle is a podcast host and contributor at BillTrack50.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

Project 2025, the conservative Heritage Foundation’s blueprint for a second Trump administration, includes an outline for a Parents' Bill of Rights, cementing parental considerations as a “top tier” right.

The proposal calls for passing legislation to ensure families have a "fair hearing in court when the federal government enforces policies that undermine their rights to raise, educate, and care for their children." Further, “the law would require the government to satisfy ‘strict scrutiny’ — the highest standard of judicial review — when the government infringes parental rights.”

Keep ReadingShow less