Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Texas Democrats block voting restrictions, but amplify dysfunction

Greg Abbott

GOP Gov. Greg Abbott threatened to defund the Texas Legislature after Democrats blocked a restrictive voting measure.

Lynda M. Gonzalez/Getty Images

Partisanship reached a boiling point in Texas over the weekend as Democratic lawmakers took a dramatic step to obstruct a GOP-backed bill that would impose severe limits on voting access.

In the final hours of the legislative session, Democrats staged a dramatic walkout, leaving the state House without a quorum and therefore unable to hold a final vote on the measure. But in doing so, Democrats have only exacerbated the polarization and dysfunction entrenched in the American political system at all levels.

Following last year's tumultuous pandemic-era election, Republican lawmakers have been pushing for stricter voting rules aimed at bolstering election security, even though there was no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Meanwhile, their Democrat counterparts are trying to expand access to the ballot box. The divergent narratives driven by the two parties have left little room for compromise, furthering political divisions.


While Texas' voting overhaul bill has been stalled by Democrats for now, the GOP has vowed to resurrect it during the special legislative session. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott can call for a special session as soon as this week, but he may wait until later in the summer so legislators can also tackle redistricting.

Abbott, who strongly supported the blocked voting legislation, also threatened to defund the Legislature following the Democrats' walkout. "No pay for those who abandon their responsibilities," he tweeted Monday afternoon.

Predictably, Republican leaders condemned the Democrats while reformers celebrated the walkout.

"This is a victory for all Texas voters!" Grace Chimene, president of the League of Women Voters of Texas, said in a statement. "Texans want elections to be free, fair, and accessible. They want a transparent process they can trust, where Americans have equal freedom to vote, no matter what they look like or where they live, whether in a small Texas town or one of Texas' major metropolitan areas. SB 7 is not what Texas voters want."

Much of the restrictions in the legislation were hashed out at the last minute behind closed doors since the Senate and House passed different versions that needed to be reconciled. Some of the provisions included bans on drive-through and 24-hour voting, new restrictions on vote-by-mail eligibility, new ID requirements for mail voting, limited early voting hours on Sundays, and increased authority for partisan poll watchers.

On Saturday, President Biden denounced the Texas bill, saying it's an attack on the sacred right to vote, much like the legislation passed earlier this year in Georgia and Florida.

"It's part of an assault on democracy that we've seen far too often this year — and often disproportionately targeting Black and Brown Americans," Biden said in a statement.

During the special session, lawmakers will have to start from scratch with the voting legislation, as well as any other bills that did not make it to Abbott's desk. There is concern that the next election overhaul measure could be even more restrictive than the one blocked by Democrats.

Texas is no stranger to blocked legislation. In 2013, then-state Sen. Wendy Davis, a Democrat, famously held a 13-hour filibuster to block a restrictive abortion measure. And in 2003, Democratic lawmakers fled to Oklahoma, beyond the jurisdiction of Texas state police, to block a vote on a Republican-drawn redistricting plan.

Minority party lawmakers have used the lack of a quorum as a political tactic to thwart legislation in other states as well. Earlier this year and in the two previous legislative sessions, Oregon has seen walkouts from Republicans wishing to block bills related to Covid-19 and the environment. A decade ago, Indiana and Wisconsin also saw walkouts from Democratic lawmakers.

Read More

When Good Intentions Kill Cures: A Warning on AI Regulation

Kevin Frazier warns that one-size-fits-all AI laws risk stifling innovation. Learn the 7 “sins” policymakers must avoid to protect progress.

Getty Images, Aitor Diago

When Good Intentions Kill Cures: A Warning on AI Regulation

Imagine it is 2028. A start-up in St. Louis trains an AI model that can spot pancreatic cancer six months earlier than the best radiologists, buying patients precious time that medicine has never been able to give them. But the model never leaves the lab. Why? Because a well-intentioned, technology-neutral state statute drafted in 2025 forces every “automated decision system” to undergo a one-size-fits-all bias audit, to be repeated annually, and to be performed only by outside experts who—three years in—still do not exist in sufficient numbers. While regulators scramble, the company’s venture funding dries up, the founders decamp to Singapore, and thousands of Americans are deprived of an innovation that would have saved their lives.

That grim vignette is fictional—so far. But it is the predictable destination of the seven “deadly sins” that already haunt our AI policy debates. Reactive politicians are at risk of passing laws that fly in the face of what qualifies as good policy for emerging technologies.

Keep ReadingShow less
President Donald Trump standing next to a chart in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Donald Trump discusses economic data with Stephen Moore (L), Senior Visiting Fellow in Economics at The Heritage Foundation, in the Oval Office on August 07, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Win McNamee

Investor-in-Chief: Trump’s Business Deals, Loyalty Scorecards, and the Rise of Neo-Socialist Capitalism

For over 100 years, the Republican Party has stood for free-market capitalism and keeping the government’s heavy hand out of the economy. Government intervention in the economy, well, that’s what leaders did in the Soviet Union and communist China, not in the land of Uncle Sam.

And then Donald Trump seized the reins of the Republican Party. Trump has dispensed with numerous federal customs and rules, so it’s not too surprising that he is now turning his administration into the most business-interventionist government ever in American history. Contrary to Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” in the economy, suddenly, the signs of the White House’s “visible hand” are everywhere.

Keep ReadingShow less
Cuando El Idioma Se Convierte En Blanco, La Democracia Pierde Su Voz

Hands holding bars over "Se Habla Español" sign

AI generated

Cuando El Idioma Se Convierte En Blanco, La Democracia Pierde Su Voz

On Monday, the Supreme Court issued a 6–3 decision from its “shadow docket” that reversed a lower-court injunction and gave federal immigration agents in Los Angeles the green light to resume stops based on four deeply troubling criteria:

  • Apparent race or ethnicity
  • Speaking Spanish or accented English
  • Presence in a particular location
  • Type of work

The case, Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, is still working its way through the courts. But the message from this emergency ruling is unmistakable: the constitutional protections that once shielded immigrant communities from racial profiling are now conditional—and increasingly fragile.

Keep ReadingShow less