Lance Kramer is the producer of The First Step, a new documentary film about criminal justice reform and cross-party coalition building in action.
THE FIRST STEP is a new film that follows a bipartisan coalition who fought for unity on criminal justice reform and decriminalizing addiction amidst unprecedented partisan divides.
In making the film, we set out to document a rare story about cross-party coalition building in action, in which a unique alliance of progressive advocates from South Los Angeles, conservative advocates from West Virginia, justice-impacted community leaders, influencers, and elected officials from both parties came together to pass the First Step Act of 2018.
The journey to pass the bill — which has since brought more than 20,000 people home from federal prison early — also encountered significant challenges both within the reform movement and across party lines.
We sought to make a complex policy fight relatable through the personal stories of front-line advocates, and place viewers at the center of challenging conversations where people disagree directly and breakthroughs occur in real time.
After premiering the film at the Tribeca Film Festival and touring with the film to more than 40 regional film festivals across 30+ states over the past year, we are now on the cusp of releasing the film theatrically this month in more than 25 cities. The film will be shown in movie theaters across the country in partnership with dozens of national and local organizations dedicated to bipartisan criminal justice reform and bridge-building, including Dream.org, REFORM Alliance, and members of the Listen First Coalition.
Our hope is that by engaging politically, culturally, and geographically diverse communities in these screenings and facilitated conversations, the film can spur progress on additional criminal justice reform and provide a kind of roadmap for expanding bipartisan coalitions to address complex issues facing our country.
In this piece three members of the Listen First Coalition — Convergence Center for Policy Resolution, YOUnify and the Facing Project — share reflections on the film and what it means to the stakeholders they serve.
As an organization that has been bringing people of wildly divergent views together for more than a decade to facilitate breakthroughs on seemingly intractable issues, we welcome The First Step film’s contribution to these tough conversations. In our experience, when people come together to listen and learn from one another across their divisions, extraordinary things can happen -- from meaningful policy change to the lasting de-escalation of toxic polarization and a healthier democracy.
We’ve seen it happen on countless contentious issues: when we work together to understand each other’s core needs and recognize our shared humanity, we can find common ground and chart a path forward. It’s an approach that demands humility, deep listening, and a willingness to defy the toxic politics that so often pit us against one another.
Our work intersected with criminal justice issues on the recent Convergence Reentry Ready program, which convened people of opposing viewpoints to identify strategies for coordinating the corrections system, social supports, and economic systems to improve reentry success for incarcerated people. That collaborative dialogue took place over many months, resulting in a set of actionable recommendations that the group presented to lawmakers and leaders. We recognize the immense challenge that the filmmakers were up against – and the opportunities for breakthrough among unlikely allies.
With The First Step, America has an opportunity to see bridgebuilding in action, and the potential that it holds.
- David Eisner, president, Convergence Center for Policy Resolution
At YOUnify, where I serve as Director of Engagement, our reason for being is to help individuals and communities of every kind, build relational atmospheres conducive to solving the key challenges of our times. This is facilitated in many ways, but all with the aim of minimizing affective polarization and other factors that prevent us from activating the solutions to what are often very solvable problems. I cultivated my passion for this work throughout my career across multiple sectors–from the military to ministry–which brought me into intimate contact with people who on the surface are worlds apart. But, when engaged emerge as people with many shared values although they may pursue them differently. Chief among those values is the desire to experience a sense of freedom, a path to self-determination, and an opportunity to contribute positively to their families and community.
What I witnessed in this film was these desires juxtaposed with the idea that there are many prison systems in our nation. And not all of them have bars. There is the prison of addiction, the prison of marginalization, and there is the prison of hyper-partisan politics. However, acknowledging these different prisons does not in any way put these states of confinement on equal footing. And yet, it does demonstrate that the cherished freedoms that Americans profess to value are–to quote Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., ”caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny.” In other words, our freedoms are bound to one another. What this film captured in its essence is the untapped potential of the American citizenry when we look at a problem that affects the many and commit to creating a solution as One.
What we also see played out is what it takes to circumnavigate the trap of, as the French proverb expresses it, allowing the perfect to be the enemy of the good. Much of the resistance to the act was because many people saw it as an imperfect policy with imperfect partners. However, the American vision is not to create perfect policies crafted by perfect people. But rather from imperfect people with imperfect perspectives work together to create a more perfect Union. I think it is important for people to watch this film as if we are looking over the shoulders of all those featured and get curious about what it took for them to work together to create a pathway for thousands to return home. And then ask ourselves, how do we do better? Because it is a long journey to Justice. And, as the title suggests, the passing of this act is just the first step.
- Pedro Silva, Director of Engagement, YOUnify
The First Step film confirmed what I and others in the bridge-building movement know to be true: real, substantive change doesn’t happen until unlikely allies sit across from one another at the table of life, practice deep listening and radical empathy, and act together knowing that the first steps of any journey may be bumpy but worth it.
While the film is centered on the work of #Cut50 and its high-profile founders, it’s anchored by the personal narratives of community leaders in South Los Angeles and West Virginia who, despite their differences, share the tragedy of addiction and incarceration between urban and rural America, and an unwavering commitment to bring home their loved ones. As the film unfolds, I was incredibly moved by their reluctance yet acceptance that transformation transpires outside of comfort zones, and the collective vulnerability when they crossed cultural and political lines to make it happen.
The work of The Facing Project encourages communities to create a more understanding and empathetic world through stories that inspire action, and we believe that stories are the most powerful tool for change. The First Step film shows the human condition in action and that stories not only bring us together but can provide freedom to thousands of people.
- J.R. Jamison, co-founder and president, The Facing Project
The First Step opened in select theaters nationwide on February 17. To find out more, visit: https://thefirststep.com/




















A golden tray sits on the Resolute Desk as President Donald Trump speaks during an announcement on American nuclear innovation in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Trump is signing multiple executive orders targeting the nuclear energy sector and easing rules for new reactors and nuclear fuel supply chains.
Trump’s hubris rivals the fallen heroes of ancient Greek mythology
In January, the New York Times asked President Donald Trump if there were any limits on his global powers.
“Yeah,” the president responded, “there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”
That was eight months ago, but fortunately Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster adaptation of “The Odyssey” has made ancient Greek literature newly relevant. Before that window closes, I’d like to talk about hubris.
Today, the term mostly means excessive pride or arrogance. That’s part of what the Greeks meant by it too, but the meaning was a bit richer and more specific. Hubris was an insolent or outrageous act that offended the gods, often because the transgressor was claiming abilities or authorities that solely belonged to supreme beings.
Nolan renamed and slightly modified the concept of xenia for the film, calling it “Zeus’ law.” In the director’s telling, mortals should follow the rules laid out by the gods, specifically the requirement to treat strangers with respect lest they be gods in disguise.
In a sense, hubris is the opposite, or at least the rejection, of xenia. The hubris of the suitors, and at times Odysseus himself, invites punishment by the gods and their mortal instruments.
Which brings me back to Donald Trump. His claim that there are no constraints on his personal power to dictate events on the global stage was one of the greatest expressions of hubris ever uttered by a political leader.
Trump’s claim was obviously false when he made it.
He vowed that he could end the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours. He’s proved powerless to make that happen. If he had divine powers to work his will, why would he have balked at implementing his tariffs so often that Wall Street adopted the “TACO trade” term for his deals? “TACO” stands for “Trump always chickens out.”
And why would Trump have made so many embarrassing concessions to China — from rescinding tariffs on Chinese goods to allowing them to buy crucial and incredibly valuable computer chips?
But Trump saw his success at capturing Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro as proof of his ability to launch missiles to the same effect as Zeus’ lightning bolts. Trump believed he was the most powerful man who ever lived.
This is no exaggeration. In March, when the Iran invasion seemed successful, Trump gave a document penned by“Presidential Historian David King” to New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan purporting to prove that Trump was “the most powerful person to have EVER walked this planet.” King was, in fact, a businessman and occasional caddy for legendary golfer Gary Player.
King compared Trump favorably to many of history’s most powerful, and often heinous, figures: Alexander the Great, Attila the Hun, William the Conqueror, Napoleon Bonaparte, Joseph Stalin, Genghis Khan, Mao Tse Tung, Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Lenin. Many of these men thought they were the most powerful person in the world, too. And many were defeated precisely because they believed it.
At least Napoleon and Hitler had a string of truly impressive victories before they learned the folly of hubris. The limits on Trump’s power have been exposed by far less august forces than the combined might of the allies in World War II or the fearsome Russian winter.
Iran is a comparatively middling power. But the regime’s ability to absorb punishment while imposing its will on the Strait of Hormuz has proved to be a greater constraint on Trump’s power than his morality or mind. We should note that, at least rhetorically, his morality has not proved much of a constraint. He has repeatedly promised to destroy Iranian “civilization” if the regime refuses to capitulate.
But they haven’t — and won’t anytime soon — because the regime’s tolerance for pain far outstrips Trump’s. The combined fear of skyrocketing oil prices, outrage of Gulf state potentates, diminishing weapon supplies and domestic unpopularity is doing the work that international law, congressional oversight and the collective opinion of foreign policy experts can’t or won’t do.
If I considered Trump more heroic than reason and facts could allow, I would say his Sisyphean predicament has the whiff of Greek tragedy to it. Trump is vexed by the fact that the Iranians won’t honor deals or ratify his countless premature claims of victory — giving new meaning to his vow that his presidency would make people tired of winning. It’s almost like they’re out-Trumping Trump.
Things might have gone better if he’d heeded that great Greek tragedian Sophocles: “For Zeus utterly abhors the boasts of a proud tongue.”
____
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.