Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Using bridging tools to improve workplace productivity and retention

Using bridging tools to improve workplace productivity and retention
Getty Images

Joan Blades is Co-Founder of LivingRoomConversations.org, MomsRising.org and MoveOn.org.

Covid upended workplace cultures around the world. For organizations that could allow employees to work remotely, work practice shifted with incredible speed. Now that social distancing is no longer required, many offices are returning to pre-pandemic in person expectations while some have decided to let go of their office space and yet other organizations have chosen a hybrid model that has employees in the office some of the time but also working remotely.


Work culture disruption has created valuable learnings and some new challenges that organizational leaders must navigate. For example:

·How does one develop a great remote or hybrid work culture?

·How does one even create a great traditional work culture when organizations are faced with ongoing adaptation due to shifts in the work environment and other societal factors such as divisiveness in our media and politics?

·How does one deal with the fact that the former social norm of avoiding certain subjects at work has become obsolete?

How employers answer these questions can mean either discovery or disaster for their organizations. Especially in work environments where people have less physical proximity, a sense of belonging has become harder to achieve without an intentional engagement plan. Political polarization, cultural, gender, age, class, and other differences have been amplified by the media and some leaders.

Fortunately, there are well researched practices to address these cultural shifts. And these practices are reasonably straightforward to implement. Conversation trainings and guides for structured conversations have been developed in the bridging movement to increase people’s listening skills, and to build understanding, connection, and appreciation for differences. Many of these practices have been tested and found to be beneficial. For example, Living Room Conversations’ six-person structured conversations were found to be effective both short term and longer term for improving participant’s mindsets, building listening skills, and applying what they learn to other parts of their lives. And this was true for both in person and video conversations. Much that has been developed for the bridging movement fits organizational needs.

Strengthening these skills in the workplace has benefits both within and beyond the workplace. First, building strong work cultures reduces turnover. People are more likely to stay in organizations where they feel they can do good work, be respected for their contributions, and experience community. Good connections between employees are key to doing this whether in person or at a distance. Shared vision, understanding of each other’s needs and concerns, mutual respect, these are markers of successful workplaces.

Second, respect built inside workplaces can have positive consequences for the wider society. Our society is inundated with highly visible failures to live up to an ideal of respect across differences. Because these frictions exist in the workplace and have to be addressed there to increase organizational effectiveness, workplaces can be a place where learning to value differences also extends to other parts of society. Many people spend half of their waking hours working. Workplaces that are intentional about promoting respect, curiosity, and good listening for the benefit of all can be leaders in restoring these qualities to our civil society as well.

This April 17th to 23rd is the National Week of Conversation. It is a collaborative event put on by the bridging community. This year’s event includes a host of workplace focused programs. Please join us to make a positive difference at work and a positive difference in society.

Read More

Understanding the Debate on Health Secretary Kennedy’s Vaccine Panelists

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., January 29, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chen Mengtong/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)

Understanding the Debate on Health Secretary Kennedy’s Vaccine Panelists

Summary

On June 9, 2025, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), dismissed all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Secretary Kennedy claimed the move was necessary to eliminate “conflicts of interest” and restore public trust in vaccines, which he argued had been compromised by the influence of pharmaceutical companies. However, this decision strays from precedent and has drawn significant criticism from medical experts and public health officials across the country. Some argue that this shake-up undermines scientific independence and opens the door to politicized decision-making in vaccine policy.

Background: What Is ACIP?

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is a federal advisory group that helps guide national vaccine policy. Established in 1964, it has over 60 years of credibility as an evidence-based body of medical and scientific experts. ACIP makes official recommendations on vaccine schedules for both children and adults, determining which immunizations are required for school entry, covered by health insurance, and prioritized in public health programs. The committee is composed of specialists in immunology, epidemiology, pediatrics, infectious disease, and public health, all of whom are vetted for scientific rigor and ethical standards. ACIP’s guidance holds national weight, shaping both public perception of vaccines and the policies of institutions like schools, hospitals, and insurers.

Keep ReadingShow less
MQ-9 Predator Drones Hunt Migrants at the Border
Way into future, RPA Airmen participate in Red Flag 16-2 > Creech ...

MQ-9 Predator Drones Hunt Migrants at the Border

FT HUACHUCA, Ariz. - Inside a windowless and dark shipping container turned into a high-tech surveillance command center, two analysts peered at their own set of six screens that showed data coming in from an MQ-9 Predator B drone. Both were looking for two adults and a child who had crossed the U.S.-Mexico border and had fled when a Border Patrol agent approached in a truck.

Inside the drone hangar on the other side of the Fort Huachuca base sat another former shipping container, this one occupied by a drone pilot and a camera operator who pivoted the drone's camera to scan nine square miles of shrubs and saguaros for the migrants. Like the command center, the onetime shipping container was dark, lit only by the glow of the computer screens.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Trump 2020 flag outside of a home.

As Trump’s second presidency unfolds, rural America—the foundation of his 2024 election win—is feeling the sting. From collapsing export markets to cuts in healthcare and infrastructure, those very voters are losing faith.

Getty Images, ablokhin

Trump’s 2.0 Actions Have Harmed Rural America Who Voted for Him

Daryl Royal, the 20-year University of Texas football coach, once said, “You've gotta dance with them that brung ya.” The modern adaptation of that quote is “you gotta dance with the one who brought you to the party.” The expression means you should remain loyal to the people or things that helped you succeed.

Sixty-three percent of America’s 3,144 counties are predominantly rural, and Donald Trump won 93 percent of those counties in 2024. Analyses show that rural counties have become increasingly solid Republican, and Trump’s margin of victory within rural America reached a new high in the 2024 election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hands Off Our Elections: States and Congress, Not Presidents, Set the Rules
white concrete dome museum

Hands Off Our Elections: States and Congress, Not Presidents, Set the Rules

Trust in elections is fragile – and once lost, it is extraordinarily difficult to rebuild. While Democrats and Republicans disagree on many election policies, there is broad bipartisan agreement on one point: executive branch interference in elections undermines the constitutional authority of states and Congress to determine how elections are run.

Recent executive branch actions threaten to upend this constitutional balance, and Congress must act before it’s too late. To be clear – this is not just about the current president. Keeping the executive branch out of elections is a crucial safeguard against power grabs by any future president, Democrat or Republican.

Keep ReadingShow less