Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Using bridging tools to improve workplace productivity and retention

Using bridging tools to improve workplace productivity and retention
Getty Images

Joan Blades is Co-Founder of LivingRoomConversations.org, MomsRising.org and MoveOn.org.

Covid upended workplace cultures around the world. For organizations that could allow employees to work remotely, work practice shifted with incredible speed. Now that social distancing is no longer required, many offices are returning to pre-pandemic in person expectations while some have decided to let go of their office space and yet other organizations have chosen a hybrid model that has employees in the office some of the time but also working remotely.


Work culture disruption has created valuable learnings and some new challenges that organizational leaders must navigate. For example:

·How does one develop a great remote or hybrid work culture?

·How does one even create a great traditional work culture when organizations are faced with ongoing adaptation due to shifts in the work environment and other societal factors such as divisiveness in our media and politics?

·How does one deal with the fact that the former social norm of avoiding certain subjects at work has become obsolete?

How employers answer these questions can mean either discovery or disaster for their organizations. Especially in work environments where people have less physical proximity, a sense of belonging has become harder to achieve without an intentional engagement plan. Political polarization, cultural, gender, age, class, and other differences have been amplified by the media and some leaders.

Fortunately, there are well researched practices to address these cultural shifts. And these practices are reasonably straightforward to implement. Conversation trainings and guides for structured conversations have been developed in the bridging movement to increase people’s listening skills, and to build understanding, connection, and appreciation for differences. Many of these practices have been tested and found to be beneficial. For example, Living Room Conversations’ six-person structured conversations were found to be effective both short term and longer term for improving participant’s mindsets, building listening skills, and applying what they learn to other parts of their lives. And this was true for both in person and video conversations. Much that has been developed for the bridging movement fits organizational needs.

Strengthening these skills in the workplace has benefits both within and beyond the workplace. First, building strong work cultures reduces turnover. People are more likely to stay in organizations where they feel they can do good work, be respected for their contributions, and experience community. Good connections between employees are key to doing this whether in person or at a distance. Shared vision, understanding of each other’s needs and concerns, mutual respect, these are markers of successful workplaces.

Second, respect built inside workplaces can have positive consequences for the wider society. Our society is inundated with highly visible failures to live up to an ideal of respect across differences. Because these frictions exist in the workplace and have to be addressed there to increase organizational effectiveness, workplaces can be a place where learning to value differences also extends to other parts of society. Many people spend half of their waking hours working. Workplaces that are intentional about promoting respect, curiosity, and good listening for the benefit of all can be leaders in restoring these qualities to our civil society as well.

This April 17th to 23rd is the National Week of Conversation. It is a collaborative event put on by the bridging community. This year’s event includes a host of workplace focused programs. Please join us to make a positive difference at work and a positive difference in society.

Read More

Governors Cox and Shapiro Urge Nation to “Lower the Temperature” Amid Rising Political Violence

Utah Republican Spencer Cox and Pennsylvania Democrat Josh Shapiro appear on CNN

Governors Cox and Shapiro Urge Nation to “Lower the Temperature” Amid Rising Political Violence

In the days following the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, I wrote Governor Cox’s Prayer Wasn’t Just Misguided—It Was Dangerous, an article sharply criticizing Utah Gov. Spencer Cox for his initial public response. Rather than centering his remarks on the victim, the community’s grief, or the broader national crisis of political violence, Cox told reporters that he had prayed the shooter would be from “another state” or “another country.” That comment, I argued at the time, was more than a moment of emotional imprecision—it reflected a deeper and more troubling instinct in American politics to externalize blame. By suggesting that the perpetrator might ideally be an outsider, Cox reinforced long‑standing xenophobic narratives that cast immigrants and non‑locals as the primary sources of danger, despite extensive evidence that political violence in the United States is overwhelmingly homegrown.

Recently, Cox joined Pennsylvania Governor, Democrat Josh Shapiro, issuing a rare bipartisan warning about the escalating threat of political violence in the United States, calling on national leaders and citizens alike to “tone it down” during a joint interview at the Washington National Cathedral.

Keep Reading Show less
Vice President J.D. Vance’s Tiebreaking Senate Votes, 2025

U.S. Vice President JD Vance delivers remarks to members of the US military on November 26, 2025 in Fort Campbell, Kentucky. The Vice President visited Fort Campbell to serve a Thanksgiving meal to service members ahead of the holiday.

Getty Images, Brett Carlsen

Vice President J.D. Vance’s Tiebreaking Senate Votes, 2025

On issues including tariffs, taxes, public media like PBS and NPR, and Pete Hegseth’s confirmation as Secretary of Defense, Vice President J.D. Vance broke seven tied Senate votes this year.

Here’s a breakdown of Vance’s seven tiebreaking votes.

Keep Reading Show less