Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Georgia sees latest vote-by-mail lawsuit as GOP starts new rebuttal

The Republican Partty has a new website, featuring this 60-second video, touting its efforts to combat the Democratic expand-the-vote lawsuits.

The latest Democratic voting rights lawsuit in a battleground state is an attempt to force easier mail-in balloting in Georgia.

The claim is the 13th that Democrats have brought across the country in an effort to break down barriers to absentee balloting, which is almost surely going to be the voting method of more Americans than ever before this year because of the coronavirus pandemic.

The suit was filled in federal court Friday, just as the Republican National Committee ratcheted up its increasingly aggressive effort to combat the wave of Democratic litigation — not only in courthouses but also in the court of public opinion.


The attorney orchestrating the Democrats' effort, Marc Elias in the Washington office of the international firm Perkins Coie, argues that a minimum of four conditions — what he calls the "four pillars" — need to be present for a fair election reliant on ballots returned by mail:

  • Postage for returning ballots must be paid by the government.
  • Ballots postmarked by Election Day must be counted even if they don't arrive until after the usual Election Day deadline.
  • Party operatives, community groups and others must be permitted to collect the ballots of others and deliver them to election offices.
  • Ballots must not be easily voided because the envelope signatures don't precisely match signatures that election officials have on file.

The Georgia suit says the state's rules are wanting in all four areas and need to be fixed to guarantee the electorate its rights.

Georgia is a touchstone for Democrats on the issue of voter suppression because they believe the 2018 governor's race was stolen from their candidate, Stacey Abrams.

More than 200,000 absentee ballots were cast in that election. But thousands of vote-by-mail applications were rejected and troves of ballots were not counted because they arrived late or because local election officials concluded the signatures did not match.

Every registered voter is being sent an absentee application for the presidential and state primaries, which were both postponed by the Covid-19 outbreak and are now on course for June 9. Even if the judge does not rule by then, there will still be five more months before the general election, when recent polling suggests President Trump is at risk of losing the state's 16 electoral votes. Both Republican senators must stand for re-election this fall and are facing serious challenges.

Elias said several more lawsuits will be filed in the coming weeks at the behest of the Democratic National Committee and its campaign organizations. The newest suit was filed on behalf of the New Georgia Project, a group started by Abrams.

The GOP, meanwhile, launched a new digital fundraising and grassroots motivational platform for "fighting back against the Democrats' assault on the integrity of our elections" by pushing a "radical expansion" of voting by mail and protections for "ballot harvesting," the GOP's term for the legal practice in most states of collecting and delivering the absentee ballots of others.

The launch of the site, ProtectTheVote.com, comes after the party signaled it had doubled its legal budget to $20 between now and Election Day. The GOP views contesting the lawsuits is a winning issue for them, both tactically and in the eyes of voters, in part because a poll commissioned by the party last week found 62 percent of voters suspicious of fraud in the electoral system.

"Americans deserve to have confidence in their elections, and we will not stand idly by while Democrats try to sue their way to victory," said party Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel.

Read More

How the Voting Rights Act Reshaped Texas’ Electoral Maps

President Lyndon B. Johnson, Martin Luther King Jr., Clarence Mitchell Jr., Patricia Roberts Harris, and other guests at the signing of the Voting Rights Act on August 6, 1965.

Yoichi Okamoto - Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum

How the Voting Rights Act Reshaped Texas’ Electoral Maps

In 2002, U.S. Rep. Henry Bonilla, a Republican, nearly lost his South Texas seat to Democrat Henry Cuellar. So when the GOP used its newfound majority in the state Legislature to redraw the voting maps the next year, they sawed through Cuellar’s hometown of Laredo and scattered Latino voters, who tended to vote Democratic, into other districts.

Latino advocacy groups sued under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the cornerstone provision of the law that prevents government bodies from diluting the voting power of specific groups. The Supreme Court found Texas lawmakers had taken away Latino voting power “because they were about to exercise it.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A group of people wait in line to get their ballots to vote in the election.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact could reshape presidential elections as Midwest states debate Electoral College reform, political polarization, and the future of winner-take-all voting in America.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

700+ Proposed Amendments Failed, Midwest Voters Can Succeed

The Midwest served as the vanguard and ideological heartland of the Progressive Era, acting as a crucial laboratory for political, social, and economic reforms that later adopted national significance. Midwestern states (the cradle of the movement) pioneered anti-monopoly efforts, democratic, and social improvements.

After 770+ failed proposed U.S. Constitutional Amendments (the most on record for one issue) to remedy the factionalism (21st century polarization) feared by the Framers of the U.S. Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
“We Can’t Afford It” Is Never an Acceptable Excuse To Deny Independents a Vote

DC voting rights advocate Lisa D.T. Rice criticized the DC City Council for failing to fund Initiative 83’s semi-open primary system, leaving 85,000 independent voters unable to participate in taxpayer-funded primaries despite overwhelming voter approval in 2024.

Photo by Getty Images on Unsplash.

“We Can’t Afford It” Is Never an Acceptable Excuse To Deny Independents a Vote

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Lisa D.T. Rice spoke before the DC City Council during a Budget Oversight Hearing on May 1 to talk about Initiative 83, the semi-open primary and ranked choice voting measure she proposed that was approved by 73% of voters in 2024.

- YouTube youtu.be

Keep ReadingShow less
The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Decision Could Reshape Local Government Across Texas

A landmark Supreme Court ruling on the Voting Rights Act could reshape Latino and Black political representation in Texas. Guillermo Ramos and other leaders warn the decision may weaken protections against discriminatory election systems in school boards and city councils.

The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Decision Could Reshape Local Government Across Texas

Guillermo Ramos remembers seeing few elected leaders who looked like him while he was growing up in the 1980s in Farmers Branch, a fast-growing affluent suburb northwest of Dallas.

Over the years, Latino representation continued to lag, he said. In 2015, after he had become a lawyer, he decided to do something about it.

Keep ReadingShow less