Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

All will get Connecticut vote-by-mail applications, but most don't qualify

Connecticut Secretary of State Denise Merrill

Secretary of State Denise Merrill plans to send out absentee ballot applications to all 2.2 million registered voters in Connecticut.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Connecticut will send a ballot-by-mail application to every registered voter, but for now only a relative handful in the state are legally allowed to complete the form.

Democratic Secretary of State Denise Merrill promised the mailing Monday as part of a multifaceted plan to make voting safer and easier during the coronavirus pandemic. But the state has strict limits on who may vote absentee, and the law does not suggest that fear of exposure to a potentially fatal virus is an acceptable reason for not going to the polls in person.

Connecticut is the only blue state among just six that have not yet modified or abandoned such excuse requirements during the Covid-19 outbreak. Unless that happens, there's little reason to expect much more than 6 percent of the electorate — the share of the vote cast by mail statewide two years ago — will have a legal claim to vote from home this year.


"My illness" is one of the six allowable reasons listed on the form for getting an absentee ballot — along with being disabled, a poll worker, on active military duty, out of town or having to restrict travel for religious reasons.

Merrill told reporters that, while she has the authority to declare that fear of the coronavirus is covered by the illness option, she would like Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont or the Democratic-majority General Assembly to take the lead in declaring such an excuse is allowable — and for how long.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

"I am completely sympathetic to the issues that people have," she said. "I think it's unconscionable that we would make people decide their health versus their vote."

Lamont said he could potentially expand absentee voting for the Aug. 11 presidential, legislative and congressional primaries through an executive order. But his emergency executive powers expire in September, so changes for the general election would be up to the Legislature. It has adjourned because of the pandemic but is expected to reconvene this summer for a special session.

Sixteen states normally require an excuse to vote absentee, but 10 have either temporarily suspended or expanded their qualification criteria to include the widespread public health concerns.

The federal government allocated $5 million to Connecticut from among $400 million in congressionally approved grants for making this year's election safer, and Merrill says the state will use the bulk of the money for mailing out the absentee ballot applications to the state's 2.2 million voters along with postage-paid return envelopes.

She says she also has the money to recruit and train general election poll workers and launch a public awareness campaign. Townships in the state are in charge of administering elections and bear much of the costs.

Read More

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

A roll of "voted" stickers.

Pexels, Element5 Digital

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

The analysis and parsing of learned lessons from the 2024 elections will continue for a long time. What did the campaigns do right and wrong? What policies will emerge from the new arrangements of power? What do the parties need to do for the future?

An equally important question is what lessons are there for our democratic structures and processes. One positive lesson is that voting itself was almost universally smooth and effective; we should applaud the election officials who made that happen. But, many elements of the 2024 elections are deeply challenging, from the increasingly outsized role of billionaires in the process to the onslaught of misinformation and disinformation.

Keep ReadingShow less
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less