Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Voting groups alarmed as early ballot centers close in key Georgia county

Georgia voters

Cobb County voters, here rallying for the Democratic candidates last month, will have just five instead of the usual 11 places to vote early in the Senate runoff.

Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

More than half of the early voting centers in Georgia's third largest county have been shuttered ahead of the high-stakes Senate runoffs next month.

When early voting starts next week, Cobb County will keep just five of its 11 voting locations open. That drastic reduction, voting rights groups say, will disproportionately impact Black and Latino voters in the western suburbs of Atlanta.

Ease of access to the voting booth is a central cause of democracy reform groups in every election, but promoting or suppressing turnout in the next federal contest is of particular importance because the twin runoffs will decide which party controls the Senate.


Because no candidate in either race attained a majority in November, both Republican incumbents are having to defend their seats in a rare second round of voting Jan. 5 — David Perdue challenged by documentarian Jon Ossoff and Kelly Loeffler facing Baptist minister Raphael Warnock. If just one of the senators wins a new term, the GOP will remain in charge. If both Democrats win, their party will have 50 seats but will have a majority once Kamala Harris becomes the tie-breaking vice president.

Six voting and civil rights organizations sent a letter Monday to Cobb County election officials asking them to keep all 11 early voting centers that were open in the general election. The organizations underscored the importance of ensuring the county's 538,000 voters could cast a ballot however is most comfortable and convenient for them.

"Reducing the number of advance voting locations for the runoff election when turnout is expected to be high and Covid-19 is raging will have a foreseeable detrimental impact on Cobb County's ability to provide smooth election operations and voters' ability to vote safely and securely," the groups wrote.

This change in election operations could also confuse voters who may try to vote at the same early voting center they used in the fall, they said.

Of particular concern is how these closures will impact minority voters since many of the targeted polling places are in communities with significant Black and Latino populations. Some will have to travel five miles or more to vote.

But Cobb officials say they don't have enough trained staff to populate all the early voting centers for the runoffs — especially with the holidays approaching and coronavirus cases surging,

"The remaining team members who agreed to work would do so only if the hours were less onerous," Janine Eveler, the county elections director, wrote back to the advocacy groups. "We are at the end of the election cycle and many are tired or just unwilling to work so hard, especially during this time of year."

In-person early voting accounted for 45 percent of general election ballots cast in Cobb County. And even with 11 places to vote then, some waited in line as long as 10 hours — another reason the advocacy groups say all the early voting sites should be kept open.

Cobb is the only jurisdiction in the Atlanta metro area planning to reduce early voting options. Neighboring Fulton, Gwinnett and DeKalb counties say they plan to repeat their operation from the fall.

Georgians may also vote by mail, which a million have already asked to do. The deadline to request an absentee ballot is Jan. 1. On Jan. 5, all 145 in-person voting precincts in Cobb County will be open.

The organizations that signed the letter are the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, All Voting is Local Georgia, Georgia's chapter of the NAACP, the SPLC Action Fund, Black Voters Matter Fund and Georgia's chapter of the ACLU.

Cobb is critical to the Democrats' fortunes. President-elect Joe Biden became the first of his party to carry Georgia in 28 years — albeit by less than a percentage point — only because he took the county by 14 points. Ossoff bested Perdue by 11 points in the county and Warnock outpolled Loeffler by 13 points.


Read More

Members of a women's softball team cheerfully join hands during practice on a sunny day, showcasing team spirit, cooperation, and enthusiasm for the sport.

Do trans women have a strength advantage? A look at studies on hormone therapy, muscle mass, and why it should determine eligibility in women's sports.

luza studios/Getty Images

Trans Females Are Not Biological Males - Let Them Play on Female Teams

Most Americans, Democrats as well as Republicans—many following the lead of President Trump—feel that it is not right for trans females to participate in women's sports. But the trans community, supported by those on the left wing of the Democratic Party, insists that this is part of ensuring the rights of trans people. The issue has been divisive among Democrats.

This is a complex issue. On the one hand, boys are boys, and girls are girls. That's the basic fact behind male and female sports, other than some intramural school sports that have boys and girls on the same team. Because boys are biologically stronger and faster than girls, separate leagues have been developed for both. This has nothing to do with gender identity; it is just a reflection of biological fact.

Keep ReadingShow less
An aerial view of a Flock camera

An aerial view of a Flock camera in Burbank, California. U.S. President Donald Trump expressed support for Flock cameras, saying he likes the AI-powered surveillance technology because of its use by law enforcement, despite concerns that it infringes on privacy.

(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Flock Cameras Are Coming Down – but We Need More To Dismantle the Surveillance State

Chances are, you’ve seen one in your neighborhood. Flock cameras have become a major flashpoint for voters in the leadup to the midterms. The concept sounds straight out of 1984 — a network of government-owned cameras that track your movements — it’s no wonder that Americans across party lines are demanding their states and towns sever ties with the controversial company. Surveillance fears are only getting stronger as we enter the AI era.

But the problem isn’t just Flock. These cameras, Automated License Plate Readers or ALPRs to be exact, are a symptom of a larger “surveil first, ask questions later” attitude that has been adopted by local and federal government for decades. In recent years, the federal government has been dramatically expanding the nation’s surveillance infrastructure. This has taken many forms, from facial recognition technology at the airport, to law enforcement monitoring your mail, to the government watching what you’re posting on your personal social media pages. Since April, many Democrats and Republicans in Congress have united to stop what would effectively be a blank check for surveillance via FISA reauthorization, demanding surveillance reforms such as closing the “data broker loophole”, which allows the government to buy Americans’ personal data without a warrant.

Keep ReadingShow less