Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

New N.C. voting machines are secretive and unhealthy, suit alleges

The ExpressVote machines scan a barcode to record the ballot.

UPDATE: The story now includes comment from the machine's manufacturer.

Voting rights groups filed their latest lawsuit on Wednesday, this one alleging new electi on systems being rolled out in North Carolina are not secure and pose a health threat.

Their suit carries significance beyond that state, the plaintiff said, because the equipment at issue is being deployed all across the country. It is called the ExpressVote touch screen machine, and its use is already facing legal challenges in Pennsylvania.


Those bringing the suit in North Carolina labeled the voting system "insecure, unreliable, unverifiable and unsafe."

The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law joined with Free Speech for People, a democracy reform group started in response to the Citizens United campaign finance deregulation ruling a decade ago, in filing the suit in state court in Wake County on behalf of the North Carolina NAACP and several voters.

It says the machines will pose a threat to the accuracy of the results in the 21 counties (out of 100 statewide) where they are supposed to be used in November because they do not create a readable paper record that voters can use to verify their choices have been properly recorded.

Instead, the printout contains a summary of a voter's choices and a barcode, which is scanned to record a vote. The barcode, which contains the actual ballot information, is not readable.

Using the touch screens also could create a health risk for voters because of the coronavirus pandemic, the lawsuit states. "We can't require voters to use machines that can become disease vectors," said John Bonifaz, president of Free Speech for People.

The machines violate provisions of the North Carolina Constitution that require free and fair elections and equal protection, the lawsuit claims.

It asks that the voting machines, made by Election Systems & Software, be decertified by the federal Election Assistance Commission and state officials and that hand-marked paper ballots be used for voting.

Spokeswoman Katina Granger said Thursday the company "stands by the ExpressVote 100 percent." It has been used successfully in thousands of places nationwide and has performed well in post-election audits, she said, and and she disputed the description of the paper receipt as not offering voters confidence their choices had properly recorded.

Both North Carolina and Pennsylvania, with a combined 35 electoral votes, were carried by President Trump last time but are high on former Vice President Joe Biden's take-back list. North Carolina is also expecting one of the closest Senate races in the nation.

Successfully pressing a broad array of litigation in such battlegrounds is key to boosting turnout that Democrats and their allies in the civil rights community see as pivotal to their chances in the fall. Republicans wield power in most of the states and are resisting the lawsuits vigorously.

Read More

An oversized ballot box surrounded by people.

Young people worldwide form new parties to reshape politics—yet America’s two-party system blocks them.

Getty Images, J Studios

No Country for Young Politicians—and How To Fix That

In democracies around the world, young people have started new political parties whenever the establishment has sidelined their views or excluded them from policymaking. These parties have sometimes reinvigorated political competition, compelled established parties to take previously neglected issues seriously, or encouraged incumbent leaders to find better ways to include and reach out to young voters.

In Europe, a trio in their twenties started Volt in 2017 as a pan-European response to Brexit, and the party has managed to win seats in the European Parliament and in some national legislatures. In Germany, young people concerned about climate change created Klimaliste, a party committed to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as per the Paris Agreement. Although the party hasn’t won seats at the federal level, they have managed to win some municipal elections. In Chile, leaders of the 2011 student protests, who then won seats as independent candidates, created political parties like Revolución Democrática and Convergencia Social to institutionalize their movements. In 2022, one of these former student leaders, Gabriel Boric, became the president of Chile at 36 years old.

Keep ReadingShow less
How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

Demonstrators gather outside of The United States Supreme Court during an oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford to call for an end to partisan gerrymandering on October 3, 2017 in Washington, DC

Getty Images, Olivier Douliery

How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground. ~ Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Col. Edward Carrington, Paris, 27 May 1788

The Problem We Face

The U.S. House of Representatives was designed as the chamber of Congress most directly tethered to the people. Article I of the Constitution mandates that seats be apportioned among the states according to population and that members face election every two years—design features meant to keep representatives responsive to shifting public sentiment. Unlike the Senate, which prioritizes state sovereignty and representation, the House translates raw population counts into political voice: each House district is to contain roughly the same number of residents, ensuring that every citizen’s vote carries comparable weight. In principle, then, the House serves as the nation’s demographic mirror, channeling the diverse preferences of the electorate into lawmaking and acting as a safeguard against unresponsive or oligarchic governance.

Nationally, the mismatch between the overall popular vote and the partisan split in House seats is small, with less than a 1% tilt. But state-level results tell a different story. Take Connecticut: Democrats hold all five seats despite Republicans winning over 40% of the statewide vote. In Oklahoma, the inverse occurs—Republicans control every seat even though Democrats consistently earn around 40% of the vote.

Keep ReadingShow less
Once Again, Politicians Are Choosing Their Voters. It’s Time for Voters To Choose Back.
A pile of political buttons sitting on top of a table

Once Again, Politicians Are Choosing Their Voters. It’s Time for Voters To Choose Back.

Once again, politicians are trying to choose their voters to guarantee their own victories before the first ballot is cast.

In the latest round of redistricting wars, Texas Republicans are attempting a rare mid-decade redistricting to boost their advantage ahead of the 2026 midterms, and Democratic governors in California and New York are signaling they’re ready to “fight fire with fire” with their own partisan gerrymanders.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stolen Land, Stolen Votes: Native Americans Defending the VRA Protects Us All – and We Should Support Them

Wilson Deschine sits at the "be my voice" voter registration stand at the Navajo Nation annual rodeo, in Window Rock.

Getty Images, David Howells

Stolen Land, Stolen Votes: Native Americans Defending the VRA Protects Us All – and We Should Support Them

On July 24, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a Circuit Court order in a far-reaching case that could affect the voting rights of all Americans. Native American tribes and individuals filed the case as part of their centuries-old fight for rights in their own land.

The underlying subject of the case confronts racial gerrymandering against America’s first inhabitants, where North Dakota’s 2021 redistricting reduced Native Americans’ chances of electing up to three state representatives to just one. The specific issue that the Supreme Court may consider, if it accepts hearing the case, is whether individuals and associations can seek justice under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). That is because the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, contradicting other courts, said that individuals do not have standing to bring Section 2 cases.

Keep ReadingShow less